Should the CEFR Illustrative Scales be localised to Malaysian Higher Education Standards? – A Conceptual Paper

Afip, A. L., Hamid, M. O., & Renshaw, P. (2019). Common European framework of reference for languages (CEFR): insights into global policy borrowing in Malaysian higher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1578195
Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 659–663.
Ali, N. L. (2013). A changing paradigm in language planning: English-medium instruction policy at the tertiary level in Malaysia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.775543
Aziz, M. S. A., & Uri, N. F. M. (2017). CEFR in Malaysia: Current issues and challenges in the implementation of the framework. In The 3rd International Conference on Language Testing and Assessment and the 5th British Council New Directions in Language Assessment Conference (pp. 2–3).
Barni, M. (2015). In the name of the CEFR: Individuals and standards. In B. Spolsky, O. Inbar-Lourie, & M. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Challenges of language education and policy. Making space for people (pp. 40–52). London: Routledge.
Barni, M., & Salvati, L. (2017). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Language Testing and Assessment, 1, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_29
Berger, A. (2020). Specifying Progression in Academic Speaking: A Keyword Analysis of CEFR-Based Proficiency Descriptors. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1689981
Chua, C. S. K. (2018). Introduction. Issues in language planning and policy: From global to local. In P. C. G. Lian, C. Chua, K. Taylor-Leech, & C. Williams (Eds.), Un(intended) Language Planning in a Globalising World: Multiple Levels of Players at Work (pp. 1–14). Warsaw: De Gruyter Mouton.
Coste, D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the development of language policies: Challenges and responsibilities (pp. 6–8). Strasbourg.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg Cedex: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe. Retrieved from www.coe.int/lang-cefr
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/history
Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2018). Fine-tuning descriptors for CEFR B1 level: Insights from learner corpora. ELT Journal, 72(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx052
Don, Z. M., & Abdullah, M. H. (2019, May 22). The reform of English language education in Malaysia. Free Malaysia Today. Retrieved from https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2019/05/22/the-reform-of-english-language-education-in-malaysia/
Foley, J. A. (2019). Issues on Assessment using CEFR in the Region. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(2), 28–48.
Hawkins, J., & Filipovic?, L. (2012). Criterial features in L2 English: Specifying the reference levels of the common European framework. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hulstijin, J. H. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, (91), 662–666.
Hulstijn, J. H., Alderson, J. C., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Developmental stages in second-language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them? In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research Link (pp. 11–20). European Second Language Association.
Ito, H. (2020). Orthoepic competence descriptors in Japanese langauge education: CEFR levels B1 to C2. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 10(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.10.1.49-66
Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2008). Scales and frameworks. In Bernard Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 495–509). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch38
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39(3), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003557
Little, D. (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000097
Malaysian Examinations Council. (2019). Malaysian university English test (MUET): Regulations and test specifications. Malaysian Examinations Council. Retrieved from http://portal.mpm.edu.my/documents/10156/3fd4da51-7768-4be2-ace5-5021ed73d9ad
McNamara, T. (2014). 30 Years on - evolution or revolution? Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.895830
Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2014). Budget 2015: People’s economy.
North, B. (2014). The CEFR in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Omar, A. H. (2016). Positioning languages in the Malaysian education system. In A. H. Omar (Ed.), Languages in the Malaysian Education System (pp. 1–30). London: Routledge.
Papageorgiou, S. (2010). Investigating the decision-making process of standard setting participants. Language Testing, 27(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349472
Papageorgiou, S., Tannenbaum, R. J., Bridgeman, B., & Cho, Y. (2015). The association between TOEFL iBT ® test scores and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels. ETS Research Memorandum No. RM-15-06. Princeton, NJ. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-15-06.pdf%0Ahttp://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/publications/report/2015/jvgf
Read, J. (2019). The influence of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in the Asia-pacific region. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(1), 12–18.
The Roadmap. (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015-2025. (Z. M. Don, Ed.).
Weir, C. J. (2005). Limitations of the Common European Framework for developing comparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt309oa

In-Text Citation: (Sufi, & Stapa, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Sufi, M. K. A., & Stapa, M. (2020). Should the CEFR Illustrative Scales be localised to Malaysian Higher Education Standards? – A Conceptual Paper. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(9), 885-897.

Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode