ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The COVID-19 pandemic has proved one of the most devastating health crises of the 21st century. Due to this reason, many educational institutions were closed in order to save lives. This action can cause interruption in educational activities. Due to this issue, Online Distance Learning (ODL) have grown in popularity and is seen as an alternative method in higher educational setting. We are now moving towards a new normal life practices due to this global health crisis. Adapting to this new normal, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) continue their teaching and learning activities using Online Distance Learning (ODL) approach starting from 13 April 2020 until now. This research paper is conducted to conceptually propose the effective strategy to conduct online distance learning (ODL) in UiTM through the perspective of ODL interaction, motivation, students’ performance and ICT and technology support system. This is due to the concern that going digital effectively requires substantial coordination by management and support from ICT service providers. Thus in order to develop ODL effectively, we must see our readiness to use an effective ODL approach as well as needs for robust curriculum pedagogical and methods. Educators must also know the students condition such as their motivation and ability to have good internet connection so that ODL can allows students to access lessons and interact with educators.
Alseweed, M. A. (2013). Students’ achievement and attitudes toward using traditional learning, blended learning, and virtual classes learning in teaching and learning at the university level. Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture, Studies in Literature and Language, 6(1), 65-73.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14.
Bartley, S. J., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 167–175.
Boyle, D. K., and Wambach, K. A. (2001). Interaction in graduate nursing Web-based instruction. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17, 128-134.
Cecilia, B., Rodriguez, P., & Armellini, A. (2015). Expanding the Interaction Equivalency Theorem. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 298–317.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) (2017), The Future of Technology and Learning, available at: https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/the-future-of-technology-and-learning_2017_tcm18-29348.pdf (accessed 20 May 2020).
De la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Enhancing Online Distance Education in Small Rural US Schools: A Hybrid, Learner-Centred Model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(4), 35–46.
Devisakti, A. (2016). Institutional Factors that Motivates Adult Learners in ODL. Asean Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 67-76.
Dumford, A., and Miller, A. (2018), “Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement”, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465.
Dzakiria, H., and Walker, R. (2003). Understanding the Culturally Diverse – Malaysian Distance Learners: Does Culture has a Role and an Effect on Learning and Practice in Distance Education. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 95-107.
Dzakiria, H., and Idrus, R. M. (2003). Teacher-Learner Interactions in Distance Education: A Case of Two Malaysian Universities. Turkey On-line Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 4(30).
Dzakiria, H., and Walker, R. (2012). Illuminating the Importance of Learning Interaction to Oprn Distance Learning Success: A Qualitative Perspective of Adult Learners in Perlis Malaysia. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning.
Gratton-Lavoie, C., & Stanley, D. (2009). Teaching and learning principles of Microeconomics online: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Economic Education, 40(1), 3–25.
Humaidi, N., Mohd, M. S., Azilah, N., Asarani, M., & Annuar, A. (2013). Students’ Performance on the Implementation of Online Learning System.
John, W. (2015). Chapter 16 leadership in implementing technology-enhanced learning in educational institutions, E-Learning – instructional design. Organizational Strategy and Management, 393-412.
Lorenzetti, J. (2013.). Academic Administration - Running a MOOC: Secrets of the World’s Largest Distance Education Classes - Magna Publications.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three Types of Interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
Muirhead, B. (2001). Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated open distance learning. USDLA Journal, 15(4). Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal /APR01_Issue/article02.html.
Murphy, D., Walker, R., & Webb, G. (2001). Online Learning and Teaching with Technology: Case Studies, Experience and Practice. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309 – 319.
Oliver, M., & Tigwell, K. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E-learning. 2(1), 17–26.
Rahman, H. (2014). The role of ICT in open and distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 162-169.
Rao, A., Murali, M. (2010). ICT in Open Distance Learning: Issue and Challenges. Pan-Commonwealth Forum.
Rentroia-Bonito, M., Jorge, J., & Ghaoui, C. (2006). Motivation to E-Learn Within Organizational Settings. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(3), 77–89.
Rumble, G. (1995). Media use at Open University, The Guardian, (Dhaka, Bangladesh) Bangladesh Open University.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–6.
Shroff, R. H., & Vogel, D. R. (2009). Assessing the Factors Deemed to Support Individual Student Intrinsic Motivation in Technology Supported Online and Face-to-Face Discussions. 8.
Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D. R., Coombes, J., Lee, F., & Vogel, D. (2007). Student E-Learning Intrinsic Motivation?: A Qualitative Analysis. 19(March).
Stansfield, M., Mclellan, E., & Connolly, T. (2004). Enhancing Student Performance in Online Learning and Traditional Face-to-Face Class Delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education, 3.
Surej, P. J. (2015). The integration of information technology in higher education: a study of faculty’s attitude towards IT adoption in the teaching process. Contaduría y Administracion.
Tait, A. (2000). Planning student support for open and distance teaching. Open Learning, 15(3), 287-299.
Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., Stich, A. E., Gill, A., Hong, C., Mcdade, J., & Sai, V. (2017). The nature and level of learner – learner interaction in a chemistry massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 411–431.
Tran, T., and Glowatz, M. (2014). A comparative case study of Irish and Vietnamese students’ eLearning perceptions and acceptance. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (iiWAS ‘14), 44-48.
Xie, K. U. I., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending te traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. 34(1), 67–89.
Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., and Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioural patterns in primary school teachers’ online collaborative learning activities. Computers and Education, 104, 1-17.
Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring Learner to Content Interaction as a Success Factor in Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 152–165.
In-Text Citation: (Musa, Rosle, Baharuddin, & Ibrahim, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Musa, A. H., Rosle, A. N., Baharuddin, F. N., & Ibrahim, S. S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Online Distance Learning (ODL) Approach in University: A Respond of Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(9), 1069-1076.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode