Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Responding to Contemporary Issues: From a Sharia Arbitration Perspective

Adnan Tawfiq Wrikat, Anas Mohd. Yunus, Najihah Abd Wahid

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i11/8149

Open access

In this study we will look at Islamic law in terms of its ability to address contemporary issues such as terrorism. Organizations terrorists that make Islam a cover for their aims are exploiting the meaning of Sharia arbitration to spread among Islamic societies, claiming that only they have the right path that protects the interests of societies. The point which help those organizations that the Islamic countries talk with their people that the source of their constitutions is Islam, and in same time their people become know the different between Islam law and the made- man laws. Frome here our study comes to answer of those questions which emerging from Muslim societies about the ability of Islamic law to be the legal and constitutional basis for organizing community relation. This research, will answer a question about the ability of Sharia law to be a legislative and legal source in Islamic countries. The importance of this paper is to identify the possibility of considering Sharia as a law regulating relations, and to identify the truth about the relationship between Islam and terrorism represented by organizations seeking to use religion as a means for them to obtain certain benefits. Study methodology, the comparative, descriptive, and analytical approach to achieve realistic results.

Abdul Hadi, J. (2014). Legalizing Islamic jurisprudence [Conference session]. Ministry of Religious Affairs, Muscat, Oman. http://alwatan.com/details/12630
Ahmad, A. (2001). The role of Islamic law in the contemporary world order. J. Islamic L. & Culture, 6 (1), 140- 148.
Al Bishri, T. (2012). Legalizing Islamic law in the people’s Assembly. Goodreads. https://goodreads.com/book/
Al Faidi, A. (2015). The origin of the jurisprudential differences in the issue of codifying the provisions of Islamic law. Journal of Alexandria Thought House. 21(1), 33-43. https://malcat.uum.edu.my/iium.u530206
Ansary, A. F. (2008). Combating extremism: A brief overview of Saudi Arabia's approach. Middle East Policy, 15(2), 111.doi: 10.1111/j.1435-4957.2008. 00353.
Colin, K. (2019). “Beyond the Caliphate: The Future of Terrorism in 2020 After the Collapse of ISIS”. Journal of The Future for Research and Advanced Studies, 17 (2), pp.3-5. Al Zuhaili, W. (2014). Legalization efforts in Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Resala foundation, 11(1), 26. https://elibrary.mediu.edu2218
Hamele, M., Poss, W. B., & Sweney, J. (2014). Disaster preparedness, pediatric considerations in primary blast injury, chemical, and biological terrorism. World journal of critical care medicine, 3(1), 10-18.doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i1.15
Hasan, N. (2007). Islamic militancy, sharia, and democratic consolidation in post-Suharto Indonesia. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/79795
Hassan, I., Azmi, M. N., & Abubakar, U. I. (2017). Framing Islam in news reporting: A Comparative content analysis. Asian Social Science, 13(10), 105-116. doi:10.5539/ass. v13n10p112
Hassan, M. H. B. (2006). Key considerations in counter ideological work against terrorist ideology. Studies in conflict & Terrorism, 29(6), 524-529.doi: 10.1080/10576100600791058
Piazza, J. A. (2009). Is Islamist terrorism more dangerous? An empirical study of group ideology, organization, and goal structure. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(1), 58 73.doi: 10.3109/10673229.2010.533005
Ramakrishna, K. (2016). Towards a comprehensive approach to combating violent extremist ideology in the digital space: The counter-ideological response (CIR) model. In Combating Violent Extremism and Radicalization in the Digital Era (pp. 212-231). IGI Global.doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0156-5.ch013
Rana, M. A. (2008). Cunter-ideology: unanswered guestions and the case of Pakistan. Perspectives on Terrorism, 2(3), 2-6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26298334
Ryan, M. W. (2018). Defeating ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the Ideological Battlefield: The Case for the Corporation Against Ideological Violence. Retrieved from: https://digital commons.usnwc.edu/ciwag-case-studies/16/
Schouten, R. (2010). Terrorism and the behavioral sciences. Harvard review of psychiatry, 18(6), 345-358.doi: 10.1080/09546550802544698

In-Text Citation: (Wrikat, Mohd. Yunus, & Abd Wahid, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Wrikat, A. T., Mohd. Yunus, A., & Abd Wahid, N. (2020). Responding to Contemporary Issues: From a Sharia Arbitration Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(11), 879-885.