Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Psychometric Properties of the Public Service Motivation Scale among Malaysian Public Service Officials

Wan Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman, Ahmad Izzuddin Fahmi Che Abd Rahim, Fatimah wati Halim

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i2/8308

Open access

Employees in the public sector should have a high motivation in delivering the best service that can influence the development of a country. However, studies on the measurement of public service motivation are still few in Malaysia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to test the psychometric qualities of the Public Service Motivation Scale through content validity, construct validity and internal consistency analyses. This study employed a survey design by administering a questionnaire consisting demographic information and the Public Service Motivation Scale to 200 respondents. Results showed that the scale has good content and construct validity with three factors extracted having good eigen values and percentage of variance explained (PVE) with PVE total of 72.49%. The factors were labelled as compassion, self-sacrifice and commitment to public interest. Research findings give implication on the suitability of the Public Service Motivation Scale to be used in measurement in the Malaysian context.

Andersen, L. B., & Pedersen, L. H. (2012). Public Service Motivation and Professionalism. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 46-57.
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16 (series B), 296-298.
Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2015). Public Service Motivation Concepts and Theory: A Critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700-710.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2005). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique & utilization. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Choi, D. L. (2004). Public service motivation and ethical conduct. International Review of Public Administration, 8(2), 99-106.
Gregory, R. J. (2011). Psychological testing; History, principles and applications. (6th Edition). Pearson Education Inc. USA.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th Edition). Upper Sadddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2). Accessed on 4th April 2017. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss2/8
Houston, D. J. (2006). “Walking the Walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67–86.
Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kelman, S. (1987). Public choice and public spirit. Public Interest, 87, 80-94.
Kim, S. (2008). Revising Perry's Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149-163.
Kim, S. (2012). Does person?organization fit matter in the public?sector? Testing the mediating effect of person?organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830-840.
Lee, G. (2005). PSM and public employees’ work performance. Korean Society and Public Administration, 16: 81-104.
Lee, Y. (2011). Behavioral Implications of Public Service Motivation: Volunteering by Public and Nonprofit Employees. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 104-121.
Pallant, J. F., & Bailey, C. M. (2005). Assessment of the structure of the hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in musculoskeletal patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9 1-9.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual—A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. (1990). The motivational basis of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 471-488.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 5-22.
Perry, J. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 181-197.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.
Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.
Siddiquee, N. A. (2006). Public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management Journal, 19(4), 339-358.
Staats, E. B. (1988). Public service and the public interest. Public Administration, 48, 601-605.
Van De Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
Van De Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalance in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119-135.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1998). Towards a theory of bias and equivalence. In J.A. Harkness (ed.). Cross cultural survey equivalance (Special issue, pp. 41-65). Mannheim: ZUMA Nachrichten.
Vandenabeele, W., Scheepers, S., & Hondeghem, A. (2006). Public Service Motivation in an International Comparative Perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 13-31.

In-Text Citation: (Sulaiman et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Sulaiman, W. S. W., Abd Rahim, A. I. F. C., & Halim, F. W. (2021). International Journal Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(1), 454–465.