The growth in the internet and social media development often seen and viewed as a radical shift in correspondence and a rehumanising aspect of communication. As a population expanded, the innovative application of social media has also drawn considerable attention to how communication is humanised and to promote civic engagement amongst digital societies. Even though social media have been praised for their potential for facilitating civic engagement, at a time most organisations are reluctant and unable to identify the functionalities of social media in developing humanise communication strategies and allocate resources to engage effectively. Therefore, a quantitative survey involved 400 respondents using purposive sampling technique has been done to investigate the usage and the functionalities of Facebooks as main predictors to build a humanise communication strategy towards promoting civic engagement. Based on multiple regression analysis, it highlighted that the group of six functionalities which are sharing, identity, groups, reputation, relationship and conversation were main contributions towards civic engagement. It is clearly explained that Facebook does not focus solely on just one function because it varies in terms of their functions and impact in promoting civic engagement. In conclusion, by analysing these predictive factors, government and organisations can understand how effective communication strategies should be developed in order to engage and promoting civic engagement among the digital communities.
Begel, A., DeLine, R., & Zimmermann, T. (2010). Social Media for Software Engineering. Proceedings FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research (FoSER 10), ACM, pp. 33–38.
Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., McCarthy, I., & Kates, S. M. (2007). When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers. Business Horizons, 50(1), 39–4.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310.
comSCORE. (2011). Social Networking Accounts for One Third of All Time Spent Online in Malaysia. [press release] OCTOBER 16, 2011.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer?Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Groysberg, B., and Slind, M. (2012). Leadership is a conversation. Harvard business review, 90(6), 76-84.
Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., and Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Hochheiser, H., & Shneiderman, B. (2010). From bowling alone to tweeting together: technology-mediated social participation. interactions, 17(2), 64-67
Hoover, G. (2005). Maintaining employee engagement when communicating difficult issues. Communication World, Nov-Dec, 25-27.
Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Lee, N. J., & Feezell, J. T. (2012). Youth online activity and exposure to diverse perspectives. New Media & Society, 14(3), 492-512.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59– 68.
Kietzmann, J., H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional build-ing blocks of social media. Bus Horiz 54(3):241–251.
Kietzmann, J. H., Silvestre, B. S., McCarthy, I. P., & Leyland, L. F. (2012). Unpacking the social media phenomenon towards a research agenda. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(2), 109–119.
Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25(4), 299–310.
Leiter, M. P., & Harvie, P. (1998). Conditions for staff acceptance of organizational change: Burnout as a mediating construct. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 11, 1-25.
Mandarano, L., Meenar, M., & Steins, C. (2010). Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement. Journal of Planning Literature, 25(2), 123-135. doi: 10.1177/0885412210394 102
Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95-97.
Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25-41.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American Society: New York: Simon & Schuster.
Raynes-Goldie, K., & Walker, L. (2008). Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth. Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, 161-188.
Rossiter, C. M., & Pearce, W. B. (1975). Communicating personally: A theory of interpersonal communication and human relationships. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Simbun, A. (2019). A Peep into Genomic Data Management in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Public Policy and Governace, 1(1), 151–162.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Happiness Studies, 3, 71- 92.
Shneiderman, B., Preece, J., & Pirolli, P. (2011). Realizing the value of social media requires innovative computing research. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 34-37.
Smith, G. (2007). Social software building blocks. From http://nform.ca/publications/social-software-building-blockWebb, M. (2004, April 28). On social software consultancy. Retrieved October 18, 2020,
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American sociological review, 174-187.
Young, K. (2011). Social ties, social networks and the Facebook experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 9(1), 20-34.
Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked the influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92.
In-Text Citation: (Latib et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Latib, L. A., Bolong, J., Ghazali, A. H. A., & Osman, M. N. (2020). Social Media Functionality as the Indicators on Fostering Civic Engagement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(16), 289–298.
