ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
In today’s dynamic and challenging business environment, the numbers in company’s financial statements alone do not represent full information on company's overall performance demanded by various parties. Behind the numbers, companies are obliged to report on the economic, environment, social and governance factors that impact their business daily activities. Thus, companies embed sustainability reporting in response in taking the economic, social and environmental performance into account. This paper concerns to analyse the effect of firm characteristics’ proxied by firms size (FSZ), firms type (FTY) profitability (PRO), and achievements (ACH) towards sustainability reporting disclose (SRD). The control variable in this study is internal goals (ING) of the company. There are four types of theories that are related with this study, which are institutional theory, legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and agency theory. Of the data collected from 60 companies’ annual report in Bursa Malaysia for three years from 2014 to 2016, the results revealed that company’s size, profitability and achievements have significant relationship with sustainability reporting disclosure. This study is important study to companies in Malaysia to sustain their business and competitiveness over the long term in order to attract the investors. This study contributes insight for managers to improve on the disclosure of material narrative statement in their annual reports. Not only this study benefits companies and managers but also to investors as they are interested to understand how organisations correspond to the risks and opportunities of non-financial matters such as economic, environment, social and governance.
Abdul, Z., & Ibrahim, S. (2002). Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 2(4), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700210447641
Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2006). Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site: Implications for sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(4), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.531
Ali, M., & Azizi, N. (2006). Putrajaya and The French Connection, Faculty of Architecture and Planning [Paper presentation]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Amran, A., & Susela Devi, S. (2008). The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(4), 386-404.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810864327
Bae, S., Masud, M., & Kim, J. (2018). A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082611
Baden, D., & Harwood, I. A. (2012). Terminology matters: A critical exploration of corporate social responsibility terms. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 615-627.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1498-9
Baker, R., & Rennie, M. D. (2006). Forces leading to the adoption of accrual accounting by the Canadian federal government: An institutional perspective. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5(1), 83-112. https://doi.org/10.1506/206k-rv7l-2jmn-w3d3
Barrett, M. E. (1976). Financial reporting practices: Disclosure and comprehensiveness in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(1),
10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490455
Bebbington, J., O' Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). Postscript and conclusions. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, 345-349. https://doi.org/10.4324/noe0415384889.ch18
Boatright, J. R. (2003). Ethics and the conduct of business (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120-136.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506
Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005
Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2005). A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: Propensities and valuation consequences. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 423-440.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.423
Buhr, N. (2007). Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.4324/noe0415384889.pt2
Buys, P., Oberholzer, M., & Andrikopoulos, P. (2011). An investigation of the economic performance of sustainability reporting companies versus non-reporting companies: A South African perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 29(2), 151-158.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2011.11892965
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (2004). Exploring organizationally directed citizenship behaviour: Reciprocity or 'It's my job'?. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00422.x
Crossman, K. M. (2013). The roles of non-governmental organizations in marine conservation [Doctoral dissertation.
Da Silva Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2010a). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.197
Da Silva Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar Guzmán, B. (2010b). The influence of the Portuguese environmental accounting standard on the environmental disclosures in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 414-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831011049070
Deegan, C. (2013). The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet … really? A reflection on ‘green accounting and green eyeshades twenty years later’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.04.004
Deegan, C. (2013). Financial accounting theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education London.
Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5), 343-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.001
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983?1997. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Epps, R. W., & Cereola, S. J. (2008). Do institutional shareholder services (ISS) corporate governance ratings reflect a company's operating performance? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(8), 1135-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.007
Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2014). Lights and shadows on sustainability rating scoring. Review of Managerial Science, 8(4), 559-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-013-0118-0
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. P. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3), 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
Gao, S. S., Heravi, S., & Xiao, J. Z. (2005). Determinants of corporate social and environmental reporting in Hong Kong: A research note. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2005.01.002
Gozali, N. O., How, J. C. Y., & Verhoeven, P. (2002). The economic consequences of voluntary environmental information disclosure. http://www.iemss.org, 31.08.2012
Graves, S. P., Waddock, S., & Kelly, M. (2001). How do you measure corporate citizenship? Business Ethics, 12(2), 155-187.
Haniffa, R., & Cooke, T. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001
Hategan, C., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R., & Hategan, V. (2018). Doing well or doing good: The relationship between corporate social responsibility and profit in Romanian companies. Sustainability, 10(4), 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041041
Heinze, D. C. (1976). Financial correlates of a social involvement measure. Akron Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 48-51.
Hezri, A. A., & Hasan, N. M. (2006). Towards sustainable development? The evolution of environmental policy in Malaysia. Natural Resources Forum, 30(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00156.x
Izzo, M. F., Ciaburri, M., & Tiscini, R. (2020). The challenge of sustainable development goal reporting: The first evidence from Italian listed companies. Sustainability, 12(8), 3494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083494
Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics social institutions. Rochester studies in economics and policy issues, vol. 1 (pp. 163-231). Springer, Dordrecht.
Jiang, C., & Fu, Q. (2019). A win-win outcome between corporate environmental performance and corporate value: From the perspective of stakeholders. Sustainability, 11(3), 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030921
Jose, A., & Lee, S. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9172-8
Joseph, C. (2013). Understanding sustainable development concept in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(3), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-03-2012-0024
Khan, H. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011029406
Kim, Y. (2005). Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 800-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00471.x
Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 275-303. https://doi.org/10.1086/467391
Kolk, A. (2005). Sustainability Reporting. VBA Journal, 21(3), 34-42.
Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2000). Accounting, management and organizational change: A comparative study of local government. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0129
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Munteanu, I., Grigorescu, A., Condrea, E., & Pelinescu, E. (2020). Convergent insights for sustainable development and ethical cohesion: An empirical study on corporate governance in Romanian public entities. Sustainability, 12(7), 2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072990
Modell, S. (2001). Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 437-464. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0164
Modell, S. (2005). Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing 62' Accountability ]ournal, 18(4), 537-563.
Ghazali, M. N. A. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756535
Nichol, E., & Taylor, D. W. (2001). Accountability and performance reporting in the public accounts of the Malaysian government. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 7(2), 35-46.
Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. (1987). The Bruntland Report. http://www.worldinbalance.net/pdf/1987-brundtland.pdf
O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870
Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(91)90003-3
Ponnu, C. H. (2008). Corporate governance structures and the performance of Malaysian public listed companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 217-230.
Poolthong, Y., & Mandhachitara, R. (2009). Customer expectations of CSR, perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(6), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320910988302
Rahaman, A. S., Lawrence, S., & Roper, J. (2004). Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: Institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1045-2354(03)00005-4
Rebekic, A., Loncaric, Z., Petrovic, S., & Maric, S. (2015). Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient - Which one to use? Poljoprivreda, 21(2), 47-54.
https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.21.2.8
Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-k
Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011054881
Sariannidis, N., Litinas, N., Konteos, G., & Giannarakis, G. (2009). A GARCH examination of macroeconomic effects on U.S. stock market: A distinguish between the total market index and the sustainability index. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1340574
Schaltegger, S., Bennet, M., & Burritt, R. L. (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Development, linkages and reflection. An introduction. In Sustainability Accounting and Reporting (pp. 1-33). Springer, Dordrecht.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Harper & Row, New York.
Stickney, C. P. (1996). Financial reporting and statement analysis: A strategic perspective. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Taylor, D. W., & Rosair, M. (2000). The effects of participating parties, the public, and size on government departments’ accountability disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 6(1), 77-97.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenword, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 1-46). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Tilt, C. A. (2001). Environmental Disclosure by Australian Companies: What is Happening Outside the Annual Report? Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Tsamenyi, M., Enninful?Adu, E., & Onumah, J. (2007). Disclosure and corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(3), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710733170
Vijayakumaran, R. (2019). Agency costs, ownership, and internal governance mechanisms: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(1), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.91.133.154
Wallace, R. S., & Naser, K. (1995). Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14(4), 311-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(95)00042-9
Watson, R., Stimpson, A., Topping, A., & Porock, D. (2002). Clinical competence assessment in nursing:a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(5), 421-431.
Yusoof, S., Iylia, F. Z., MNSR, H., Zamziba, N., & Toriry, S. (2016). Relationship Between Economic, Political and Technology Factors: Case Study on Toyota Company. International Journal of Academic Research in Public Policy and Governace, 3(1), 53–58.
Zahid, M., Ghazali, Z., & Rehman, H. (2016). Corporate sustainability practices & reporting: A case of Malaysian REITs and property listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2).
Zeghal, D., & Ahmed, S. A. (1990). Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 3(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579010136343
In-Text Citation: (Aris et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Aris, N. M., Yusof, S. M., Idris, N. I. I., Zaidi, N. S., & Anuar, R. (2021). Analysis of Firms’ Characteristics Affecting the Sustainability Reporting Disclosure in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Busines and Social Sciences. 11(14), 1-20.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode