ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Purpose – Promoting Computational Thinking (CT) in education has become an interest among scholars to develop CT skills to promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills among young people. However, it remains a challenge for Malaysian educators to teach CT at school, especially in rural primary schools. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of visual art in learning the problem-solving process and as an unplugged approach to involve learners in computational thinking.
Methodology – This study employed qualitative exploratory method to understand the use of visual art as a pedagogical tool for young learners to manifest CT. Twenty-two Primary 4 and Primary 5 students, aged 10 to 11 years old, were chosen as the participants of the study. The participants are from an indigenous community of Sarawak Penan, who used to be nomadic. We used on-site observation to collect qualitative data. The content analysis method was also used to examine classroom activities and participants’ task outcomes.
Findings – Through the art-making experience and unplugged approach, the participants were able to Illustrate their ability to grasp essential concepts of computational thinking – abstraction, decomposition, and algorithms. The CT activities conducted were simple, manageable, and easy to understand. The findings have shown that implementing the art-integration approach in computational thinking suited the needs of the young novice rural learners. The approach was found to be accessible for the local teachers, as it eases the burden of copious preparation and implementation. The approach enabled the teachers to overcome common comprehension problems when relating new foreign concepts to young learners staying in remote rural regions. During the drawing activity, researchers have observed that male students performed better in drawing and abstraction skills, while female students performed better in recognising patterns and colours.
Significance – The findings will help remote rural teachers to reflect on attempts to teach and improve CT instruction using non-computerised materials and incorporate art into other subjects. Our work contributes to the pedagogical strategies that link foreign concepts to indigenous ways of knowing, through the introduction of an unplugged approach and art-integration into the presentation of new learning content. Our work has illustrated how important it is for remote rural teachers to find the right balance between explanation and demonstration of visual worked examples.
Amparado, M. J. B., Javier, P. M. C., Pomar, E. J. E., Aquino-Malabanan, M. G., & Landicho, L. C. (2014). Self-Actualization of Married and Unmarried among Middle aged Professionals. International Journal of Academic Research in Psychology, 1(2), 18–25.
Andreea-Diana, S. (2014). The importance of involving young learners from the rural area in using ICT skills and tools – A milestone. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.114
Anna, F., Sha’rif, S., Wong, W., & Mariappan, M. (2017). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration study of primary school students’ in robotic and graphical programming. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education, 7(1993), 44–54. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/AJATeL/article/download/1983/1444
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer Science Unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266882704_Computer_Science_Unplugged_school_students_doing_real_computing_without_computers
Ben-Ari, M., Bednarik, R., Ben-Bassat Levy, R., Ebel, G., Moreno, A., Myller, N., & Sutinen, E. (2011). A decade of research and development on program animation: The Jeliot experience. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 22(5), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.04.004
Brackmann, C. P., Moreno-Leon, J., Roman-Gonzalez, M., Casali, A., Robles, G., & Barone, D. (2017). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (January 2018), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. AERA, 1–25. Retrieved from https://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf
Chiazzese, G., Fulantelli, G., Pipitone, V., & Taibi, D. (2018). Engaging primary school children in Computational Thinking: Designing and developing videogames. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 19, 63–82. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d24a/5252de73e9a079ed084b22b38e3115ffd823.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, P. V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
CSTA, & ISTE. (2011). An operational definition of computational thinking. Report 1. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2014). Developing computational thinking in the classroom: A framework. Computing at School, (June), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Developing-Computational-Thinking-in-the-Classroom%3A-Curzon-Dorling/52871c1545cafc4b094e0ad687b221ad54a7b7ab
Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. R. (2014). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE '14). ACM, 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670767
Dana Foundation. (2008). Dana Foundation releases arts and cognition research. EurekAlert!, 5–7. Retrieved from https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/df-dfr030408.php
Faber, H. H., Wierdsma, M. D. M., Doornbos, R. P., Van der Ven, J. S., & De Vette, K. (2017). Teaching Computational Thinking to Primary School Students via Unplugged Programming Lessons. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12(March), 13–24. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315716538_Teaching_Computational_Thinking_to_Primary_School_Students_via_Unplugged_Programming_Lessons
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers’ Perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38–57. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2fRI88H
Halili, S. H., & Sulaiman, H. (2018). Factors influencing the rural students’ acceptance of using ICT for educational purposes. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.022
Hamarah, C. M., & Mohamad, F. S. (2020). Mathematical cognition and Big Data analytics: Are Sarawak teachers ready?. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 6(1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340318021_Mathematical_Cognition_and_Big_Data_Analytics_Are_Sarawak_Teachers_Ready
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2015). Revisiting programming to enhance mathematics learning. Paper presented at the Math + Coding Symposium. Western University. In I. K. Namukasa, D. Kotsopoulos, L. Floyd, J. Weber, Y. Kafai, S. Khan, … S. Somanath, (2015), From computational thinking to computational participation: Towards Achieving Excellence through Coding in elementary schools. Retrieved from https://researchideas.ca/coding/docs/CT-participation.pdf
Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & MacKinnon, L. (2012). Learning programming at the computational thinking level via digital game-play. Procedia Computer Science, 9, 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.056
Khine, M. S. (2018). Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines: Foundations and Research Highlights [e-book]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9
Korb, J. T., Hambrusch, S., Mayfield, C., Yadav, A., & Zhou, N. (2014). Computational thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2
Kramer, J. (2007). Is abstraction the key to computing? Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1232743.1232745
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Liau, S.-F. (2018). Implementation of arts education in Malaysian primary schools: The teachers’ perspective. 3rd International Music and Performing Arts Conference Proceedings (13-15 November), 245-250. Retrieved from http://impac2018.upsi.edu.my/images/Proceedings/Swee-Foong Liau-paid ClareEdit doc.pdf
Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Labadin, J., & Aziz, N. A. (2017). Preliminary investigation: Teachers’ perception of Computational Thinking concepts. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–9), 23–29. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324886429_Preliminary_Investigation_Teachers'_Perception_on_Computational_Thinking_Concepts
Looi, C. K., How, M. L., Longkai, W., Seow, P., & Liu, L. (2018). Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking. Computer Science Education, 28(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959
Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014, June 23-25). Computational Thinking in K-9 Education. Paper presented at ITiCSE-WGR'14 - Working Group Reports of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, Uppsala, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713610
Marshall, J. (2005). Connecting art, learning, and creativity: A case for curriculum integration. National Art Education Association, 46(3), 227–241. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261821367_Connecting_Art_Learning_and_Creativity_A_Case_for_Curriculum_Integration
Namukasa, I. K., Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Weber, J., Kafai, Y., Khan, S., … Somanath, S. (2015). 'From computational thinking to computational participation: Towards Achieving Excellence through Coding in elementary schools'. In G. Gadanidis (Ed.), Math+ coding symposium. London: Western University. Retrieved from https://researchideas.ca/coding/docs/CT-participation.pdf
National Research Council. (2010). Report of a Workshop on The Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12840
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Psycharis, S. (2018). Steam in education: A literature review on the role of Computational Thinking, Engineering Epistemology and Computational Science. Computational Steam Pedagogy (CSP). Scientific Culture, 4(2), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1214565
Samberg, M. J. (2018). Problem-solving in the digital age: Bringing design and computational thinking to the K-12 Classroom (Doctoral dissertation, East Carolina University, North Carolina, United States). Retrieved from https://thescholarship.ecu.edu/handle/10342/6714
Silverstein, L. B., & Layne, S. (2010). Definition arts integration. The Kennedy Center's Changing Education Through The Arts (CETA) Program, 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.artsintegrationpd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AIdefinitionhandout.pdf
Sullivan, G. (1993). Art-based art education: Learning that is meaningful, authentic, critical and pluralist. Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320834
Sumintono, B. (2017). Science education in Malaysia: Challenges in the 21st Century. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 36(3), 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295250020_Science_education_in_Malaysia_challenges_in_the_21_st_century
Turchi, T., & Fish, A. (2019). Fostering Computational Thinking Skills with Tangible User Interfaces (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom). Retrieved from https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/19126/1/FulltextThesis.pdf
Waite, J. L., Curzon, P., Marsh, W., Sentance, S., & Hadwen-Bennett, A. (2018). Abstraction in action: K-5 teachers’ uses of levels of abstraction, particularly the design level, in teaching programming. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(1), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v2i1.23
Wang, D., Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2014). A tangible programming tool for children to cultivate computational thinking. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/428080
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Winner, E., Goldstein, T., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? Overview. OECD Publishing, 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264180789-en
Wong, G. K. W., Ma, X., Dillenbourg, P., & Huen, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: Where to start?. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381884
Wu, M. L. (2018). Educational game design as a gateway for operationalising computational thinking skills among middle school students. International Education Studies, 11(4), 15. https:/doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n4p15
Xanthoudaki, M. (2017). From STEM to STEAM (education): A necessary change or 'the theory of whatever?'. SPOKES, 28(March), 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315893720_From_STEM_to_STEAM_education_A_necessary_change_or_'the_theory_of_whatever.
In-Text Citation: (Anuar et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Anuar, N. H., Mohamad, F. S., & Minoi, J.-L. (2021). Art-Integration in Computational Thinking as an Unplugged Pedagogical Approach at A Rural Sarawak Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(14), 21–39.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode