The Merging of Reciprocal Teaching and 5e Instructional Model: A Conceptual Framework

Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093.
Ali, H., & Ulkar, V. (2020). The effect of inquiry-based approach on development of reading and writing kkills of a university EFL students. Asian EFL Journal, 27, 84-100.
Bailey, E. (2015). Reading comprehension skills: Making predictions. Retrieved Dec 12, 2019, from http://specialed.about.com/od/readingliteracy/a/Reading-Comprehension-Skills-Making-Predictions.htm
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Read Writ, 32, 2281–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Van Scatter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). BSCS SE instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A report prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Chang, M. M., & Lan, S. W. (2019). Exploring undergraduate efl students’ perceptions and experiences of a moodle-based reciprocal teaching application. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298
Dardjito, H. (2019). Students’ metacognitive reading awareness and academic english reading comprehension in EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12439a
Dana, N. F., Thomas, C., & Boynton, S. (2011). Inquiry: A districtwide approach to staff and student learning. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Introduction: Teaching and learning for understanding. powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Elleman, A. M, & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
Gilbert, F. (2018). Riding the reciprocal teaching bus. A teacher’s reflections on nurturing collaborative learning in a school culture obsessed by results. Changing English, 25(2), 146–162. doi:10.1080/1358684x.2018.1452606
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F.L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd Ed). New York: Routledge.
Gorlewski, J., & Moon, S. (2011). Research for the classroom: Trying on reciprocal teaching: A novice's struggle becomes a veteran's success. The English Journal, 101(2), 97-100.
Gruenbaum, E. A. (2012). Common literacy struggles with college students: Using the reciprocal teaching technique. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42(2), 109- 116.
Hall, M., & Burns, M. (2017). Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.002.
Herman, E., Yunus, N., & Pammu, A. (2018). The role of inquiry-based learning to improve reading comprehension of EFL students. ELS Journals on Interdisciplinary Studies on Humanities, 1(1), 13-20.
Kamdideh, Z., Vaseghi, R., & Talatifard, S. (2019). The effects of 'reciprocal teaching of reading' and 'cooperative integrated reading and composition' on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL intermediate students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9, 1111-1117.
Kanoksilapatham, B. & Todsapon, Suranakkharin. (2018). Celebrating local, going global: Use of northern thainess-based english lessons. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15, 292-309. 10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.1.292.
Kim, YS., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S. (2020). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Child Development. 91. 638-660. 10.1111/cdev.13204.
Kucan, L., & Palincsar, A. (2017). Text analysis: Critical component of planning for text-based discussion focused on comprehension of informational texts. Literacy Research and Instruction. 1-17. 10.1080/19388071.2017.1400612.
Kula, S. S., & Budak, Y. (2020). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension, retention on learning and self-efficacy perception. Pegem E?itim ve Ö?retim Dergisi, 10(2), 493-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.017
Lian, Y. K., & Azlina Abdul Aziz. (2020). An action research on metacognitive reading strategies instruction to improve reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, 9(2), 86-94.
Lee, Y. H. (2014). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language pedagogy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1236-1244.
Lenchuk, I. (2021). Reciprocal Teaching as an Instructional Strategy for Identifying Reading Literacy Problems: A Case Study of an Omani EFL Classroom. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies,10(1), 1-10.
MacKay, E. J., Larcohe, A., Parrila, R., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). A beginning exploration of text generation abilities in university students with a history of reading difficulties. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1610.
Malaysia of Education Malaysia. (2018). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025: Annual Report 2017. Malaysian Ministry of Education. Putrajaya.
McElvain, C. M., & Smith, H. A. (2016). Curiosité: Inquiry-based instruction and bilingual learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 5(2), 63-75.
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D., & Reichard, C. (2018). Revising the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 219-246. 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3.
Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.
Moore, G. E., & Moore, B. A. (1984). The problem solving approach to teaching: Has it outlived its usefulness? The Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 25(2), 3-10.
Moses, L., Busetti-Fervert, R., & Pritchard, R. (2015). Inquiry as ESL: Support emerging bilinguals and content and language development. The Reading Teacher, 68(6), 435-447.
Oczkus, L. D. (2019). Reciprocal teaching at work (3rd ed.). International Literacy Association.
OECD (2010), PISA 2009 Results: Executive summary. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2012), PISA 2012 Results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Oktavia, D., & Fitriana, D. (2017). Developing students’ reading comprehension skills through reciprocal teaching strategy. Advances in Social Sciences Education and Humanities Research, 82, 23-27.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771–777
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50–62. http://www.ifets.info/journals/13_4/6.pdf
Smidt, S. (2015). An abc of early childhood education: A guide to some of the key issues. London: Routledge.
Stripling, B. K. (2003). Inquiry-based learning. In B.K. Stripling & S. Huges-Hassell (Eds.), Curriculum Connections through the Library, 3-39. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Teng, M. F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy.
Ulu, H. (2019). Examining the relationships between the attitudes towards reading and reading habits, metacognitive awarenesses of reading strategies, and critical thinking tendencies of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.549319
UNESCO. (2017b). More than one-half of children and adolescents are not learning worldwide. Fact Sheet No. 46, UIS/ FS/2017/ED/46. Montreal, QC: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/ default/files/documents/fs46-more-than-half-childrennot-learning-en-2017.pdf
van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wale, B., & Bishaw, K. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2.
Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K., Scammacca, L. N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018). Current Evidence on the Effects of Intensive Early Reading Interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51. 002221941877511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110.
Williams, J. A. (2010). Taking on the role of questioner: Revisiting reciprocal teaching. The Reading Teacher, 64(4), pp. 278–281.
Yang, Y. F. (2010). Developing a reciprocal teaching/learning system for college remedial reading instruction. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1193-1201.

In-Text Citation: (Dew et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Dew, T. P., Swanto, S., & Pang, V. (2021). The Merging of Reciprocal Teaching and 5e Instructional Model: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 983-996.

Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode