Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Independent Directors and Stakeholders Protection: A Case of Sime Darby

Prashanth Beleya, Gopalan Raman, Charles Ramendren, Suresh Nodeson

Open access

In today’s ever challenging corporate environment, the unfortunate events of decision making by top management has led major companies to suffer huge losses. This results and mistakes made have given a significant impact to the stake holder’s perception and raise a serious questions on the role of board of directors especially the role of independent directors. In today’s fast evolving business pace with stiff economic conditions, unethical and misjudgment in business decisions are driving the board’s role in corporate governance as an integral element. Hence, corporate governance can be defined as the way listed entities should be operating in accordance with legal framework, rules and regulations that underpin an institution so as to ensure strict compliance with law, sharing and balancing of powers between board of directors and stakeholders. As such, the board with a balance mixture of types of directors, where the independent directors predominate the board’s strategy formulation and implementation in the interest of governance is needed. This paper seeks to bring focus to the importance of the role of independent directors in ensuring that the organization runs its operations in the manner where stakeholders especially shareholders and corporate governance is a virtue.

Allen, W.T. (2001). The Mysterious Art of Corporate Governance, Corporate Board. 22 (130): 1-5. Borowski,I. 457 (1984). Corporate Accountability: The Role of the Independent Director. Journal of Corporation Law. Cadbury, A. (1992). The Financials as aspects of Corporate Governance: Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee Publishing, London Dimirbas, D, Yukhanaev, A. (2011). “Independence of board of Directors, employee relation and harmonization of corporate governance”, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 33: 444-471 Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implication, Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91. Freeman, R. E., R. Phillips. 2002. Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Bus. Ethics Quart. 12(3) 331–350. Gunasekaran.P. (2011). Breaking up Sime Darby. Retrieved August 28 2010, from http://biz.thestar.com.my/ Kose, J. and Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness, Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 371–403. Krugman, P. (1998). "Bubble, boom, crash: theoretical notes on Asia's crisis", mimeo. Melkumov, D. (2009). “Institutional background as a determinant of boards of directors’ internal and external roles: the case of Russia”, Journal of World Business, 44, pp 94-103 O’Regan, P., O’Donnell, D., Kennedy, T., Bontis, N. and Cleary, P. (2001). “Perceptions of intellectual capital: Irish evidence”, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 29-38 OECD. (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris Pass, C. (2004), Corporate Governance 4 (2): 52-63, Emerald Publishing Limited. Roy, W.G. (1997). Socialising Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at Work: How Directors View Their Roles and Responsibilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, NY. The World Bank. (1998). East Asia: The Road to Recovery, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

N/A