Design Thinking for Creative Teaching of Chemistry.

Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305
Ahmad, A. A., Ismail, F., Ibrahim, N. M., & Samat, N. A. (2017). Investigating the Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Malaysian Classrooms: Insights from L2 Teaching Practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4-2). doi:10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1361
Amabile, Teresa M. 2018. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Routledge.
Amir , N., Siew, & Chong, C. L. (2015). The Perceptions of Preservice and In-service Teachers Regarding a Project-Based STEM Approach to Teaching Science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20.
Andrew. (2015). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2015.Retrieved https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2015
Ali, M., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., Surif, J., Talib, C. A., & Saim, N. (2015). Web Pro-Mc Physics as a support tool for improving physics problem solving skills. 2015 Game Physics and Mechanics International Conference (GAMEPEC). doi:10.1109/gamepec.2015.7331851
Aliusta, G. O., & Özer, B. (2017). Student-Centered Teacher Roles and Student-Centered Student Roles Teacher Interview. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t62222-000
Amir, N. (2015). Showcasing the Creative Talents in Science of the Academically Less-Inclined Students through a Values-Driven Toy Storytelling Project. Cases on Instructional Technology in Gifted and Talented Education Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, 141-179. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6489-0.ch007
Anderson, J. C., & Naeim, F. (2012). Basic Structural Dynamics. doi:10.1002/9781118279137
Andrew. (2015) World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2015 Retrieved July 01, 2019 from https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2015
Balaji, G. (2017). Learning Styles Among Secondary School Students. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 4(24). doi:10.21922/srjhsel.v4i24.10417
Barroca, A., & Soares, J. (2017). Design Thinking Mindset Applied To Education And Training. INTED2017 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2017.1988
Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14-27. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002
Burnard, P. (2016). Considering creative teaching in relation to creative Learning. Creative Teaching for Creative Learning in Higher Music Education, 49-62. doi:10.4324/9781315574714-5
Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult? Educación Química, 23, 305-310. doi:10.1016/s0187-893x(17)30158-1
Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination,Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom. The Journal of Academic development and Education, 1.
Carroll, M. (2014). Learning from What Doesn't Work: The Power of Embracing a Prototyping Mindset. Retrieved from web.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/publications_resources.php
Caruso, C. (2011). The Tools of Engagement: Bridging Design Thinking and Social Media to Enhance and Support Collaborative Learning. Carleton University.
Correiro, E. E., Griffin, L. R., & Hart, P. E. (2008). A constructivist approach to inquiry-based Learning: A TUNEL assay for the detection of apoptosis in cheek cells. American Biology Teacher, 70(8), 457-460. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-
7685(2008)70[457:ACATIL]2.0.CO;2
DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2015). The principles of learning for problems solving. Proceedings in Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam. Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Diaz, I. S., Goldhausen, I., Weise, L., Ralle, B., & Fuccia, D. D. (2018). Magic In Chemistry Class: An Activity To Foster Students' Interest. INTED2018 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2018.1246
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 201–213.
Eilks, I., & Hofstein, A. (2017). Curriculum Development in Science Education. Science Education, 169-181. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_13
Elkind D: Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Medford; 1999
Ellingson, L. L. (2018). Pedagogy of Laughter: Using Humor to Make Teaching and Learning More Fun and Effective. Teaching with Sociological Imagination in Higher and Further Education, 123-134. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6725-9_8
Febriana, B., & Arlianty, W. (2017). The Application Of Authentic Assessment In Chemistry Curriculum Studies. doi:10.17501/icedu.2017.3111
Fulmer, G. W. (2013). Constraints on Conceptual Change: How Elementary Teachers' Attitudes and Understanding of Conceptual Change Relate to Changes in Students' Conceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1219-1236. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9334-3
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of 'context' in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–976
Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2004) A creative cocktail Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 243-253.
Gurses, A., Acikyildiz, M., Dogar, C., & Sozbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based Learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25, 99-113
Gürses, A., Çetinkaya, S., Do?ar, Ç., & ?ahin, E. (2015). Determination of levels of use of basic process skills of high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 644–650
Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2004). A creative cocktail: Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(3), 243-253. doi:10.1080/0260747042000309475
Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. (2016). Science Education Research and Practice in Malaysia. Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, 71-93.
doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_5
Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1017-1039. doi:10.1080/09500690600702504
Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. T. (2016). Science education research and practice in Malaysia. In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 71-93). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_5
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347-1362
Idris, N. B. (2019). Malaysia. Issues in Upper Secondary Science Education. doi:10.1057/9781137275967.0010
Ingram, D. D., & Ingram, D. (2020). Beautiful chemistry: Getting high school girls interested in chemistry. doi:10.1021/scimeetings.0c06149
Irwanto. (2018). Using Integrated Assessment To Measure Students' Analytical Thinking And Science Process Skills. doi:10.31227/osf.io/rjk6u
Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 155-63. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a
Jamil, S. Z., & Khairuddin, R. F. (2017). Students interest in learning science through fieldwork activity encourage critical thinking and problem solving skills among UPSI pre-university students. doi:10.1063/1.4983913
Jobst, B., Köppen, E., Lindberg, T., Moritz, J., Rhinow, H., & Meinel, C. (2012). The Faith-Factor in Design Thinking: Creative Confidence Through Education at the Design Thinking Schools Potsdam and Stanford? Design Thinking Research, 35-46. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_3
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design Thinking: Past,Present and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146.
Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2017). Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7
Kim, K. H., Williams, N., & Siradakis, A. (2019). Rural Creativity and Urban Creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1-4. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200068-1
Kwek, D. (2011). Innovation in the Classroom: Design Thinking for 21st Century Learning.Stanford EDU,(2011). Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/materials/Kwek-Innovation In The Classroom.pdf
Lindquist, W. P. (2001). A case study of online collaborative inquiry in an elementary classroom. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota.
Lee, C. D. (2019). Practice that supports learning and development: A commentary. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 141-145. doi:10.1080/10888691.2019.1609735
Li, Y. (2014). International Journal of STEM Education - a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1). doi:10.1186/2196-7822-1-1
Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (2012). Preliminary Report: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. [online] moe.gov.my. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf .
Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2005). Crayfish investigations: Inquiry in action for grades 4-8. Science Activities, 41 (4), 3-6.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., &Stanco, G. M. (2012).TIMSS 2011 International results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College
Meyer, D. (2012) : Designing design challenges - getting the details right: using engineering problems to enact inquiry learning.Sci Teach 2012,79(2):58–62.
Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking Research. Design Thinking Research, 1-11. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_1
Ministry of Education, MOE. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint Executive Summary [Online], Available: http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/articlefile/2013/ articlefile_file_003114.pdf [28 Aug 2014]
Ministry of Education, MOE (2014). Malaysia Education Blueprint annual report [Online], Available: http://www.padu.edu.my/files/AR/PADU_AR_2013_ENG.pdf [01 Sep 2014]
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). (2017). Science and Technology Human Capital Roadmap: Towards 2020. Putrajaya: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre, MOSTI
Mohandas, P., & Rajaratnam, P. OC. (2015). A policy analysis of the delivery of primary and secondary school Mathematics and Science in English. Education Research and Perspectives, 4(2015), 246-285
Morais, M. F., & Azevedo, I. (2010). What is a creative teacher and what is a creative pupil? Perceptions of teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 330-339.
Muhlisin, A. (2017). An Analysis of University Students' Conceptual Understanding and Retention on Science Basic Concepts. doi:10.31227/osf.io/yztdx
Nieswandt, M., & Horowitz, G. (2015). Undergraduate Students' Interest in Chemistry: The Roles of Task and Choice. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, 225-242. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_13 ). Undergraduate Students' Interest in Chemistry: The Roles of Task and Choice. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, 225-242. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_13
Niaz, M., & Luiggi, M. (2014). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of the Periodic Table. SpringerBriefs in Education. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01086-1
Odell, M., & Kennedy, T. J. (2020). Inquiry-Based Pedagogy To Support Stem Learning And 21St Century Skills: Preparing New Teachers To Implement Project And Problem-Based Learning. INTED2020 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2020.1976
OECD. (2017), education at a Glanc 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris .http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-enOsborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation
Otte, C. R., Bølling, M., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Teaching maths outside the classroom: Does it make a difference? Educational Research, 61(1), 38-52. doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1567270
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and in the sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18: 948-952
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking: Understand-Improve-Apply.Berlin: Springer-Verlag. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0
Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.
Rahmawati, M. A., Agustin, A., Ridwan, E., Erdawati, D., Darwis, R., & Rafiuddin. (2019) The development of chemistry students' 21 century skills through a STEAM project on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402, 055049.
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence. In First International Conference on Design Creativity (pp.1–8). Kobe, Japan.
Regan, E., & DeWitt, J. (2015). Attitudes, interest and factors influencing STEM enrolment behaviour: An overview of relevant literature. In Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 63-88). Springer Netherlands.
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational leadership, 67(1), 16-21.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. ,and Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence
of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 50(5): 1020-1049
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. and Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence
of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. and Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence
of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049
Regan, E., & Dewitt, J. (2014). Attitudes, Interest and Factors Influencing STEM Enrolment Behaviour: An Overview of Relevant Literature. Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, 63-88. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_5
Russell, J. W., Kozma, R. B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1997). Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330. doi:10.1021/ed074p330
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. and Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms.American Educational Research Journal, 50(5): 1020-1049
Sadler, M. (2013). 2020 Vision. Itnow, 55(1), 22-23. doi:10.1093/itnow/bws134
Silverman, M. P. (2015). Motivating Students to Learn Science: A Physicist's Perspective. Creative Education, 06(18), 1892-1992. doi:10.4236/ce.2015.618203
Scheer, A., & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, 2-20.
Scoffham, Stephen and Barnes, Jonathan (2011). Happiness Matters: Towards a Pedagogy of Happiness and Well-being. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), pp. 535-548
Skaggs, P., Fry, R., & Howell, B. (2009). Innovations Unlimited: Thinking About Design Thinking. In The NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting (p. 2009). Washington, D.C.
Starko, A. J. (2013). creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. Routledge.
Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the Classroom. doi:10.4324/9780203115176
Steele, D., & Whitaker, T. (2019). Good Lesson Plans Don't Redeem Poor Relationships. Get to Know Your Students … Then It Becomes Much Easier to Teach Them. Essential Truths for Teachers, 11-12. doi:10.4324/9780429022029-7
Starko, A. J., & Krynski, A. (2020). Classroom Environment Conducive to Creativity. Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, 1-6. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4.
Sindia, S. (2015). Innovative practices session 2C: New technologies, new challenges - 2. 2015 IEEE 33rd VLSI Test Symposium (VTS). doi:10.1109/vts.2015.7116258
Touli, E., Talbi, M., & Radid, M. (2015, June 18). Teaching and Learning of Experimental Science: The Case of Chemistry in Secondary Qualifying Morocco.
Thomas, S., & Budnik, M. (2017). Can a First-year Professor be More Successful with a Flipped Classroom than with a Traditional Classroom? 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. doi:10.18260/1-2—28001
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological, and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328.
Watson, A. D. (2015). Design Thinking for Life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18. Retrieved
fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ106038
2&lang=de&site=edslive&authtype=ip,uid\nhttp://www.arteducators.org/research/
art-education
Westwood, P. (2013). Inclusive and Adaptive Teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069806
World Economic Forum. (20160. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016.Geneva
: World Economic Forum.
World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018,Geneva: World Economic
Forum: ISBN 978-1-944835-18-7
Widodo, S. (2018). Implementation Of Tgt Learning Model To Improve Learning Activities And Study Results. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 2(1), 37. doi:10.26740/jcer.v2n1.p37-44
Yaman, F., Ayas, A., & Çalik, M. (2019). Facilitating grade 11 students' conceptual understanding of fundamental acid-base models. Turkish Journal of Education, 16-32. doi:10.19128/turje.449100

In-Text Citation: (Veerasinghan et al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Veerasinghan, K., Balakrishnan, B., Damanhuri, M. I. M., & Gengatharan, K. (2021). Design Thinking for Creative Teaching of Chemistry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 670-687.

Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode