In order for an organization to stay competitive in its core business, the workforce has to be formed from a group of people who happy, satisfied and focus on the task entrusted to them. Therefore it is paramount to makesure that the working environment the employers prepare for the workforce has to be of their preferences and expectation. Understanding the humanistic requirements of the future workforce who are technological incline is very important to help retain them in the organization. The development of improved technology has pushed the boundaries of human expectation to another level that place the employers to be well prepared for the newer generation which is starting to take their places in the working world. This genenration is non other than Gen Z. Labelled as “ the always connected generation’’, this generation will definitely have their expectation of the future work environment in order to maintain them in the office. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the response of 347 students from a group of private colleges who are Gen-Z born in 1995 to 2000 in an effort
to conceptualize the preferred future working environment that will suit and retain them. The Smart Partial Least Square (Smart PLS) study shows a close relationship between characteristics, preferred communication, preferred leadership, expectation towards the working environment, towards their expected working environment. This study introduces significant results with implications for both practical methods and analytical analysis.
Agarwal, H., & Vaghela, P.S. (2018). Work Values of Gen Z: Bridging the Gap to the Next Generation. National Conference on Innovative Business Management Practices in 21st Century 21-22 December, 2018.
Buckley, P., Viechnicki, P., & Barua, A. (2015). A new understanding of millennials: Generational differences reexamined. Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/economy/issues-by-the-numbers/ understanding-millennials-generational-differences.html
Christensen, C. M., & Henry J. E. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside out, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 3. PMID: 29807190.
Ferri-Reed, J. (2016). Know Your XYZs: Understanding and harnessing multigenerational talent Quality Progress: Milwaukee, 49(3), pp. 18-23.
Fry, R. (2018). Millennials are the largest generation in the U.S. labor force. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/11/millennials-largest-generation-us-labor-force/
Gerst, R. (2013). Understanding employee engagement and trust: The new math of engagement surveys. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 35(4), pp. 32-36.
Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(2), 98-103.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jaworek, M., Dylag, A.M. (2015). Perception of work environment among women and men – workload and autonomy in relation to job engagement. Jagiellonian Journal of Management 1(3), 155–174.
MacKenzie, J., McGuire, R., & Hartwell, S. (2012). The First Generation of the 21st Century: An introduction to the Pluralist Generation by Magid Generational Strategies. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56d7388222482e1e2c87c683/t/56e0cdc2cf80a14684670194/1457573327672/ MagidPluralistGenerationWhitepaper.pdf
Sharil, M. S., Nazuha, N. M., & Nik Sulaiman, B. (2017). Overview of “Generation Z” Behavioural Characteristic and its Effect Towards Hostel Facility. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(2), 59-67.
Merriman, M. (2015). What if the Next Big Disruptor Isn’t a What but a Who? Ernst & Young. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ EY-rise-of-gen-znew-challenge-forretailers/$FILE/EY-rise-of-gen-znewchallenge-for-retailers.pdf
Merriman, M., & Valerio, D. (2016). One Tough Customer: How Gen Z is Challenging the Competitive Landscape and Redefining Omnichannel. Ernst & Young Report. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-one-tough-customer/$FILE/ EYonetough -customer.pdf
Miller, J., & Katz, D. (2018). Gender Differences in Perception of Workplace Experience Among Anesthesiology Residents. The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM, 20(1), E618.
Neves, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2012). Management communication and employee performance: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Human Performance, 25(5), 452-464.
Ng, S. I., Ho, J. A., Lim, X. J., Chong, K. L., & Latiff, K. (2019). Mirror, mirror on the wall, are we ready for Gen-Z in marketplace? A study of smart retailing technology in Malaysia, Young Consumers, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2019-1006
O’Boyle, C., Atack, J., & Monahan, K. (2017). Generation Z enters the workforce: Generational and technological challenges in entry-level jobs. Deloitte Insight. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/technology-and-the-future-of-work/generation-z-enters-workforce.html#endnote-14
Olanipekun, L. O. (2017). Work Environment and its Implication On Employees Performance. Unpublished report from Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.
Örtenblad, A. (2013), ‘What do we mean by “learning organization”?, in Anders Örtenblad (ed.), Handbook of Research on the Learning Organization: Adaptation and Context. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing
Patel, D. (2017). The Top 5 Traits Gen Z Looks For In Leaders. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/deeppatel/2017/08/27/the-top-5-traits-gen-z-looks-for-in-leaders/#357b6c78609d
Ram, B. S. (2020). Survey: Malaysians find ageism a barrier to work opportunities. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/02/564843/survey-malaysians-find-ageism-barrier-work-opportunities
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
Ruotsalainen, J., & Heinonen, S. (2015). Media ecology and the future ecosystemic society. European Journal of Futures Research, 3(1), DOI: 10.1007/s40309-015-0068-7
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday-Currency
Singh, A. P., & Dangmei, J. (2016) Understanding the generation Z: the future workforce. South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 3(3), 1-5
Singh, A. (2014). Challenges and Issues of Generation Z. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 16 (7), pp. 59-63.
Stahl, A. (2019). How Generation-Z Will Revolutionize The Workplace. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2019/09/10/how-generation-z-will-revolutionize-the-workplace/#6ee25974f537
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. Harper Collins.
Tan, N. J. L. (2018). Adoption and use of social media among digital immigrants in Genting Malaysia Berhad. Unpublished PhD thesis from Asia E University.
Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generation Do Differ: Best Practices in Leading Traditionalists, Boomers and Generations X, Y and Z. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators, 51-58.
In-Text Citation: (Rashid et. al., 2021)
To Cite this Article: Rashid, M. A. A., Rasli, A., Othman, M. N. A. bin., Ismail, I. R., Abdul Rahim, Z., & Said, R. A. (2021). Exploring Predictors of Gen Z Working Environment in Malaysia: A Case Study on a Group of Private Colleges. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 836-850.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
