ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
This study sought to examine the use of a specific type of rhetorical move structure known as the ILMC (Introduction - Literature - Method - Conclusion) organisational model in writing academic research abstract compositions (RACs). A linear structure of writing development commonly associated with native English writers would aid in creating the logical appeal of the academic research composition. This was substantiated by the theoretical concept of Aristotelian Rhetoric to underscore the significance of rhetorical appeal in the form of logos or logical domain shown by the academic research writers. The research design was content analysis in which 480 RACs were employed based on the criterion method of sampling from eighty-eight indexed journals both from Malaysia and International research open-access journal repositories. A qualitative software of NVivo12 was used by the present researcher in manually analysing the employment of the ILMC move structures and its sub-types. The major findings revealed that writers of English as a second language (WESL) from Malaysia employed the sequential form of ILMC move structure, being the standard characteristic of the Anglo-European style of straightforward writing development in expanding the main points of a topic under examination. However, they had difficulties in ascertaining that all parts of the ILMC move structure were retained as they showed more missing moves dedicated to Literature and Methodology sections than the English writers from the UK, US, and Australia utilised these moves for the same sections. It was concluded that Malaysian ESL writers showed the importance of showing the standard linear writing structure commonly used by the international writers but did not yet master the rhetorical functions of the component parts at the discourse level. Future research can be directed to explore the cultural and non-cultural contributions behind such rhetorical patterns of academic writing development.
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2012). Investigating move structure of English applied linguistics research article discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1.
Aristotle & G.A. Kennedy (1991). Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London and New York: Longman.
Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st Century U.S. workforce. USA: The Conference Board, Inc., the Partnership for21st Skills, Corporate Voices for Working Families, and the Society for Human Resource Management.
Chang, Y. & Hsu, Y. (1998). Requests on email: A cross-cultural comparison. RELC Journal, 29(2), 121-151.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
De Beaugrande, R. and W. Dressler. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London and New York: Longman.
Harati, N. A., & Mobashshernia, R. (2019). On Generic Macro-structure of Empirical Research Articles: A Management Discourse Community Perspective. Studies, 7(3), 47-58.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. London: Longman Pearson Education.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: sub-disciplinary variations in Applied Linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 29-55.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16, 1-20.
Lehman, I. M., & Su?kowski, ?. (2020). Representation of voice in English essays of non-native students of business. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-14.
Li, Z., & Xu, J. (2020). Reflexive meta discourse in Chinese and English sociology research article introductions and discussions. Journal of Pragmatics, 159, 47-59.
Loan, T. K. B. (2022). Move-Step Analysis of Research Article Abstracts. World Journal of English Language, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p204
Mahzari, A., & Maftoon, P. (2007). A contrastive study of the introduction section of English and Persian medical research articles. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 1(3), 201-214.
Marquez, M. K. L. (2016). A Contrastive Rhetoric Analysis of Professional Register in Internal Communication Electronic Mails. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 106-124.
Mohamad, H. A. (2022). Analysis of Rhetorical Appeals to Logos, Ethos and Pathos in ENL and ESL Research Abstracts. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), e001314. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i3.1314
Mohamad, H. A., Mohaini, M. L., & Nath, P. R. (2020). An Analysis of Lexical Chunks in Online Business Letters (OBL) and Business Letter Corpus (BLC): A Corpus-Based Study. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 63-83.
Mohamad, H. A., Pilus, Z., Mohaini, M. L., Zolkapli, R. M., & Wahab, N. A. (2022). Rhetorical strategies for appeal to logos in research abstracts: an analysis of rhetoric. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1-15.
Mohamad, H. A., Pilus, Zolkapli, R. M., Mohaini, M. L., Wahab, N. A. & Nath, P. R. (2023). The rhetorical density of authorial emotiveness and voice passiveness in abstract compositions. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 13 (2), 61-77.
Mohamad, H. A., Mohaini, M. L., Zolkapli, R. B. M., Nath, P. R., Wahab, N. H. A., Soopar, A. A., Rashid, M. H. A., Abdullah, A., & Pilus, Z. (2023). Emotive Discursivity of Move Structures in the Organisational Rhetoric of Composing Academic Research Abstracts (ARAs). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 2463 – 2484.
Pastor, M. L. C., & Calderón, R. M. (2015). Variations in Business English letters written by Spanish learners. Revista de Lenguas para–Fines Específicos, 16, 39-56.
Pham, V. P. H., & Bui, T. K. (2022). Genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Pham, VPH, & Bui, TKL (2021). Genre-based Approach to Writing in EFL Contexts. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 95-106.
Susilowati, E., & Akmilia, P. M. (2019, September). The realisation of theme and thematic progression in non-native writers? research article abstracts. In UNNES International Conference on ELTLT (pp. 40-48).
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zolkapli, R. B. M., Mohamad, H. A., Mohaini, M. L., Wahab, N. H. A., & Nath, P. R. (2022). Code-Switching and Code-Mixing in the Practice of Judgement Writing in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(3).
(Mohamad et al., 2023)
Mohamad, H. A., Wahab, N. H. A., Nath, P. R., Zolkapli, R. B. M., Mohaini, M. L., Rashid, M. H. A., Soopar, A. A., Abdullah, A., & Norazizan, M. H. (2023). Analytical Appeals of Move Structures in Systematically Organising and Communicating Research Ideas. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 12(3), 381–400.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode