Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

The Role of Interactive Whiteboard on Classroom Management

Hamdi Serin

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i4/1936

Open access

Recently technology-enhanced applications have become an increasingly important component of education. There is no doubt that the use of technology in education has yielded improvements in learners’ achievement. Interactive whiteboard, regarded as one of the most effective educational tool, has the potential to revolutionize classroom instruction. Moreover, interactive whiteboard supports classroom management through motivating learners to participate in classroom activities. The use of interactive whiteboard enhances learners’ engagement in the classroom which facilitates classroom management. This study focuses on the impacts interactive whiteboard makes on classroom management. A questionnaire including 100 participants was conducted and the study found that the use of interactive whiteboard in the classroom largely influences classroom management.

Akbas, O., & Pektas, H. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 1-19.
Brouse, C. H., Basch, C., & Chow, T. H. (2011). Use and efficiency of various technological methods in the different aspects of teaching and learning a foreign language at 16 universities in New York. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 30-39.
Burden, K. (2002). Learning from the bottom up–the contribution of school based practice and research in the effective use of interactive whiteboards for the FE. HE sector. Discussion paper presented at LSDA, Making an Impact Regionally Conference. The Earth Centre, Doncaster. Retrieved from http://ww. lsda. org. uk/files/lsda/regions/8_Bio_KBurde n. pdf.
Dhindsa, H. S., & Emran, S. H. (2006). Use of the interactive whiteboard in constructivist teaching for higher student achievement. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for the Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Computing (pp. 175-188), Abu Dhabi.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719-740.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Retrieved 23 November 2008, from
http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
O’Dowd, R. (2007). Online intercultural exchange: an introduction for foreign language teachers. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Orr, M. (2008). Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms, CALL-EJ Online, 9(2).
Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443–457.
Soares, A. D. (2010). IWBs as support for technology-related projects in EFL education in Brazil. In M. Thomas & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice (pp. 238-250). The United States: IGI Global.Swan, K.; Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunication (pp. 3290-3297). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Walker, D. (2003). White enlightening, Times Educational Supplement, 19.
Zevenbergen, R., & Lerman, S. (2008). Learning environments using interactive whiteboards: New learning spaces or reproduction of old technologies? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 107 - 125.

In-Text Citation: (Serin, 2015)
To Cite this Article: Serin, H. (2015). The Role of Interactive Whiteboard on Classroom Management. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(3), 116–123.