Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

Unravelling Digital Transformation Acceptance in Online Flexible Distance Learning Higher Education Institutions

Zahir Osman, Malik Yatam

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v13-i2/20925

Open access

This study endeavors to conduct a thorough examination of the intricate relationships among performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, self-efficacy, and the acceptance of digital transformation within the specific context of online distance learning higher education institutions in Malaysia. By building upon established theoretical frameworks, the study seeks to empirically validate the relevance and interplay of these constructs in the unique educational landscape of online flexible distance learning. Data collection was executed through a meticulously designed questionnaire distributed among employees in these institutions, and the subsequent analysis involved a meticulous application of rigorous regression, hypothesis testing, and structural equation modeling techniques, leveraging responses from a diverse sample of 387 participants. This study adopted the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique and used smartpls4 for data analysis. While affirming the validity of all direct relationship hypotheses, the study revealed that only two indirect relationship hypotheses were substantiated. This underscores the nuanced dynamics characterizing acceptance within the online distance learning environment. Theoretical implications derived from these findings contribute to an enriched understanding of acceptance theories, shedding light on the multifaceted factors influencing digital transformation in online education. Looking forward, future research avenues could delve into exploring additional variables, conducting longitudinal studies to unveil the long-term impacts of digital transformation, and investigating cultural influences on acceptance dynamics. In essence, this study contributes significantly to advancing insights into the realm of digital transformation within online education, offering valuable perspectives that can inform both practical implementations and policy frameworks in higher education institutions.

Alam, S. S., Masukujjaman, M., Ahmad, M., & Jaffor, R. (2023). Acceptance of online distance learning (ODL) among students: Mediating role of utilitarian and hedonic value. Education and information technologies, 28(7), 8503-8536.
Alhwaiti, M. (2023). Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Application in the Post-Covid Era and Its Impact on Faculty Members’ Occupational Well-being and Teaching Self Efficacy: A Path Analysis Using the UTAUT 2 Model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 2175110.
Altalhi, M. (2021). Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: The modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1589-1605.
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of M-Learning in Higher Education: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Electronics, 10(24), 3171
Anthony Jnr, B. (2022). An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3107-3133.
Anthony Jr, B., Kamaludin, A., & Romli, A. (2023). Predicting academic staffs behaviour intention and actual use of blended learning in higher education: Model development and validation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 1223-1269.
Be?irovi?, S., & Dervi?, M. (2023). Students' perspectives of digital transformation of higher education in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(2), e12243.
Biryuk, D. (2022). Higher education institutions in the digital economy era: digital transformation of higher education. Available at SSRN 4309823.
Campbell, L. O., & Frawley, C. (2023). An exploration of factors that predict higher education faculty members’ intentions to utilize emerging technologies. Educational technology research and development, 1-17.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-
2909.112.1.155
Criollo-C, S., González-Rodríguez, M., Guerrero-Arias, A., Urquiza-Aguiar, L. F., & Luján-Mora, S. (2023). A Review of Emerging Technologies and Their Acceptance in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(1), 10.
Dahri, N. A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., Yahaya, N., Vighio, M. S., Al-maatuok, Q., ... &
Al-Adwan, A. S. (2023). Acceptance of Mobile Learning Technology by Teachers: Influencing Mobile Self-Efficacy and 21st-Century Skills-Based Training. Sustainability, 15(11), 8514.
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89-106.
Giang, N. T. H., Hai, P. T. T., Tu, N. T. T., & Tan, P. X. (2021). Exploring the readiness for digital transformation in a higher education institution towards industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(2), 4-24.
Grosseck, G., Mali?a, L., & Bunoiu, M. (2020). Higher education institutions towards digital transformation—the WUT case. In European higher education area: Challenges for a new decade (pp. 565-581). Springer International Publishing.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., and Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.
Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021). The influence of technology acceptance, academicself-efficacy, and gender on academic achievement through online tutoring. Computers & Education, 172, 104252.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1): 115-135.
Khalid, J., Ram, B. R., Soliman, M., Ali, A. J., Khaleel, M., & Islam, M. S. (2018). Promising digital university: A pivotal need for higher education transformation. International Journal of Management in Education, 12(3), 264-275.
Kock, N. (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10
Latip, M. S. A., Noh, I., Tamrin, M., & Latip, S. N. N. A. (2020). Students’ acceptance for e-learning and the effects of self-efficacy in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 658-674.
Latip, M. S. A., Tamrin, M., Noh, I., Rahim, F. A., Nur, S., & Latip, N. A. (2022). Factors affecting e-learning acceptance among students: The moderating effect of self-efficacy. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 116-122.
Lazim, C. S. L. M., Ismail, N. D. B., & Tazilah, M. D. A. K. (2021). Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law, 24(1), 13-20.
Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., &
Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, Yet Forsaken? Introducing a Cross-validated Predictive Ability Test in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362-392.
Liu, Y., Lu, X., Zhao, G., Li, C., & Shi, J. (2022). Adoption of mobile health services using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model: Self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 944976.
Malureanu, A., Panisoara, G., & Lazar, I. (2021). The relationship between self-confidence,self-efficacy, grit, usefulness, and ease of use of e-learning platforms in corporate training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(12), 6633.
Nguyen-Anh, T., Nguyen, A. T., Tran-Phuong, C., & Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, A. (2023). Digital transformation in higher education from online learning perspective: a comparative study of Singapore and Vietnam. Policy Futures in Education, 21(4), 335-354.
Madzamba, H., & Matorevhu, A. (2023). Assessing Performance expectancy, Effort expectancy and Social influence effects on Lecturer Technology acceptance and Use. Journal of African Education, 4(2).
Osman, Z., Mohamad, L., & Mohamad, R. K. (2021). Enhancing Students' Online Engagement Among Online Distance Learning Institutions' Students in Malaysia. The Role of Digital Readiness as a Mediator. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 9473-9483
Othman, I. W., Mokhtar, S., Tham, A., & Yong, K. (2021). The Significance of Entrepreneurship Education Literacy in The Era of Digital Transformation: Graduates of the Post-Pandemic Covid-19 Unemployment Crisis. International Journal of Accounting, 6(37).
Pham, H., Tran, Q. N., La, G. L., Doan, H. M., & Vu, T. D. (2021). Readiness for digital transformation of higher education in the Covid-19 context: The dataset of Vietnam's students. Data in brief, 39, 107482.
Pumptow, M., & Brahm, T. (2021). Students’ digital media self-efficacy and its importance for higher education institutions: development and validation of a survey instrument. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26, 555-575.
Punjani, K. K., & Mahadevan, K. (2022). Transitioning to online learning in higher education: Influence of Awareness of COVID-19 and Self-Efficacy on Perceived Net Benefits and Intention. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 291-320.
Raju, R., Noh, M. N. H., Ishak, S. N. H., & Eri, Z. D. (2021). Digital Tools Acceptance in Open Distance Learning (ODL) among Computer Science Students during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 408-417.
Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek:
SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
Santos, H., Batista, J., & Marques, R. P. (2019). Digital transformation in higher education: the use of communication technologies by students. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 123-130.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Self-Efficacy Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01119-000
Shmueli, G., S. Ray, J.M. Velasquez Estrada, and S.B. Chatla. (2016). The elephant in theroom: predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research 69: 4552–4564.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Wang, Z., & Chu, Z. (2023). Examination of higher education teachers’ self-perception of digital competence, self-efficacy, and facilitating conditions: An empirical study in the context of China. Sustainability, 15(14), 10945.
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, Z., & Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2023). The predicting role of EFL students’ achievement emotions and technological self-efficacy in their technology acceptance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-12.

(Osman & Yatam, 2024)
Osman, Z., & Yatam, M. (2024). Unravelling Digital Transformation Acceptance in Online Flexible Distance Learning Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management and Sciences, 13(2), 43–58.