Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Predictors of Quality Teaching in Makkah Primary Schools

Rosnani Jusoh , Nada Abdul Raheem M Mlibari

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/4799

Open access

The aim of this study is to examine the predictors of quality teaching in Makkah primary schools by examining the set of factors that influence Makkah primary school teachers. Based on Keller’s and Abraham Maslow’s theories of motivation, a model is developed and tested to examine teachers’ motivational factors to quality teaching. Five precursors (interest, relevance, expectation, satisfaction and self-actualisations) of quality teaching are presented in the model. The analysis procedure made use of descriptive statistics and bivariate correlation. The findings reveal that there is a reasonably high quality teaching among Makkah primary school teachers. In addition, the result indicated a significant positive relationship between the independent variables (interest, relevance and self-actualisation) and the dependent variable (quality of teaching). And found interest, relevance and self-actualisation as statistically significant predictors of quality teaching among Makkah primary school teachers.

Alamri, M. (2011). Higher education in saudi arabia. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 11(4), 88–91. Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6321-0
Alhawiti, M. M. (2013). Strategies and action plans for integrating ict into saudi elementary schools curricula?: the case of tabuk district of education, 3(2). Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.259
Alkarni, A. (2014). Problems which may challenge the ability of secondary school, 11, 55–74.
Alnahdi, G. H., & Arabia, S. (2014). Educational change in saudi arabia, 10(1), 1–7.
Alvin, J., and C. Rick. 1986. Validation of a short index of self-actualization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 12 (1):63-73.
Astleitner, H., & Keller, J. (1995). A model for motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(3), 270-280.
Belfield, C. R. (2005). Workforce gender effects on firm performance and workers’ pay: Evidence for the UK. Applied Economics, 37, 885–891. doi:10.1080/00036840500048829.
Berson, J. E., (2012).Teachers ’ perspectives of teacher supervision policies & practices in charter schools in pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI Number: 3493892).
Bickford, N. (1989). The systematic application of principles of motivation to the design of printed instructional materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Bijstra, J. (2015). Triangulating Measures of Teacher Quality in Teaching Students With Behavioral Problems, 14(3), 294–314.
Billingsley, B. S., & Cross, L. H. (1992). Predictors of commitment, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in teaching: A comparison of general and special educators. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 453–471. doi:10.1177/002246699202500404.
Bohlin, R., & Milhelm, W. (1994, February). Applications of an adult motivational instructional design model. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer attitudes. The Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1-9.
Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., & Sin, C. (2015). The quality of teaching staff?: higher education institutions’ compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance — the case of Portugal. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9211-z
Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the servqual dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33-55.
Cashin, W.E. (1999). Student ratings of teaching: uses and misuses. In P. Seldin (Ed.), Changing practices in evaluating teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
ChanLin, L. (1994). A case for assessing motivation from learning a computer-assisted instruction. (ERIC Document Reproductions Service No. ED376 803).
Cheng, M. M. H., Tang, S. Y. F., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2014). Interpreting ambivalence regarding motivation for teaching among student and teachers. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 147–156. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0167-9
Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 36-49.
Claeys, L. (2011). Teacher motivation to teach and to remain teaching culturally and linguistically diverse students.
Creswell, J. W., (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Pearson
Cummins, R. A. (2016). Happiness is the right metric to measure good societal functioning. Society, 53(3), 273–277. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0011-y
Education, M. (2008). National Report on Education Development In The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Education, M. O. (2016, May 20). Saudi Education. Retrieved from Educational System in Saudi Arabia: http://ww

In-Text Citation: (Jusoh & Mlibari, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Jusoh, R., & Mlibari, N. A. R. M. (2018). Predictors of Quality Teaching in Makkah Primary Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(4), 30–50.