From an Artist into an Art Researcher

Allison, B. (1994). Research in art and design in the United Kingdom. Higher Education Review, 26(2), 49-64.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2005). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to the methods of action research. Retrieved from:
http://www.cneq.unam.mx/programas/actuales/especial_maest/maestria/ff_cn_1aE/00/02_material/archivos/20_Teachers_investigate_their_work.pdf
Anderson, F. E. (2001). Benefits of conducting research. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 18(3), 134-141. doi: 10.1080/07421656.2001.10129733.
Austin, R. D., Devin, L., & Sullivan, E. E. (2012). Accidental innovation: supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process. Organization Science, 23(5), 1505-1522. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0681.
Baunsgaard, V. V., & Clegg, S. (2013). ‘Walls or boxes’: The effects of professional identity, power and rationality on strategies for cross-functional integration. Organization Studies, 3, published ahead of printing April 3, 2013. doi: 10.1177/0170840612464756.
Bordens, K. S. (2010). Contextual information, artistic style and the perception of art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(1), 111-130. doi: 10.2190/EM.28.1.g
Bruns, H. C. (2013). Working alone together: coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management, 56(1), 62-83. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0756.
Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: a view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261-276. doi: 10.1080/13645570701401644.
Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy. Definitions, objectives and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351-164.
Coutts, G., & Jokela, T. (Eds.) (2008). Art, community and environment: educational perspectives. Chicago, IL: Intellect Books.
Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. (1988). The experience of time, pleasure, and interest during aesthetic episodes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6(1), 1-12. doi: 10.2190/5YN3-J3P8-FWHY-UDB3
Efland, A. (2004). The entwined nature of the aesthetics: A discourse on visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 45(39), 234-251.
Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art: a study in the psychology of artistic imagination. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Freeman, W. (1994). Coaching, periodization, and the battle of artist versus scientist. Track Technique, 127, 4054-4057.
Gajdusek, D. C. (1994). Early inspirations. Creativity Research Journal, 7(3&4), 341-349.
Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gwyther, G., & Possamai-Inesedy, A. (2009). Methodologies à la carte: an examination of emerging qualitative methodologies in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 99-115. doi: 10.1080/13645570902727680.
Hall, W. B., & MacKinnin, D. W. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(4), 322-326.
Hanna, J. L. (1996). Arts education and the transition to work. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(2), 31-37.
Hecker, A. (2012). Knowledge beyond the individual? Making sense of a notion of collective knowledge in organization theory. Organization Studies, 33(3), 423-445. doi: 10.1177/0170840611433995.
Hockey, J., & Allen-Collinson, J. (2002). The supervision of practice-based research degrees in art and design. Journal of Art & Design Education, 19(3), 345-355. doi: 10.1111/1468-5949.00237.
Jackson, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21-28. doi: 10.1080/17459430701617879.
Jarvis, P. (1999). The practitioner researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Jacob, F. (1988). The statue within: An autobiography. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Kallick-Wakker, I. (1994). Science icons: the visualization of scientific truths. Leonardo, 27(4), 309-315.
Kernan, J. D. (1956). Manuel García: the artist and scientist. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 32(8), 612.
Krebs, H. (1960). The making of a scientist. Nature, 215, 1441-1445.
Lampela, K. (2012). Taiteilijoita tarvitaan ihan toisenlaisiin hommiin. Tutkimus kuvataiteilijoiden asenteista ja taiteen yhteiskuntakriittisistä mahdollisuuksista [Artists are needed in totally different jobs. A research on artists’ attitudes and the society-critical possibilities of art]. (Phd. Diss., University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland).
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management, 56(1), 1-13. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.4001.
Laursen K. (2012). Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1181-1220. doi: 10.1093/icc/dts025.
Leary, P. (2001). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinary. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397-403.
MacIntosh, R., Beech, N., Antonacopoulou, E., & Sims, D. (2012). Practising and knowing management: A dialogic perspective. Management Learning, 43(4), 373-383. doi:1177/1350507612452521.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20(4), 273-281.
Maclagan, D. (2001). Psychological aesthetics: Painting, feeling, and making sense. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Macleod, K. (2007). Writing/art. Studies in material thinking. Retrieved from http://www.materialthinking.yolasite.com/resources/v1i1/Katy.pdf.
Macleod, K. (Ed.). (2013). Thinking through art: reflections on art as research. London: Routledge.
Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (2004). The doctorate in fine art: the importance of exemplars to the culture. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(2), 155-168.
Mason, R. (2005). Art teachers and action research. Educational Action Research, 13(4), 563-580.
McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creative syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43.
Mäkinen, E.-J. (2012). Abstraktin taiteen tekijäksi – mikrohistoriallinen elämäkertatutkimus Liisa Rautiaisesta [Becoming an abstract artist – a micro-historical biographival study of Liisa Rautiainen] (PhD. Diss., University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland).
Määttä, K. (1994). Kuvaamataidon opiskelijasta/opettajasta taiteen tutkijaksi [From the student/teacher of art education into art researcher]. In M. Tuominen (Ed.), William Blake, Pekka Puupää ja hän eli keskusteluja intuitioista, oivalluksesta ja analyysistä [William Blake, Pekka Puupää and him: discussions of intuition, insight, and analysis] (pp. 83-97). Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
Määttä, K. (1998). Kuvaamataidon opetus tutkimuksen kohteena. Mitä kuvaamataidon opetuksen koulutusohjelman opiskelijat ovat tutkineet [Teaching of art education as the target of research. What have students of art education researched?] Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
Määttä, K. (Ed.) (2001). Kuvaamataidon opettajuuden näkökulmia [Perspectives to teacherhood in art education]. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland.
Määttä, K. (2012). The pedagogy of supervising doctoral theses. In K. Määttä (Ed.), Obsessed with the doctoral thesis. Supervision and support during the dissertation process (pp. 143-160). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). The framework of teacherhood in art education. World Journal of Education, 3(2), 38-49. doi: 10.5430/wje.v3n2p38.
Newbury, D. (1996). Knowledge and research in art and design. Design Studies, 17(2), 215-219. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(95)00025-M
Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612-629. doi: 10.1287/orsc.110.0664
Nikula, S. (2012). Paikan henki. Matkailijan mielikuvasta graafiseksi kuvaksi [The spirit of the place. From a traveler’s image into a graphic picture]. (PhD. Diss., University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland).
Oxman, R. (1995). Observing the observers: research issues in analysing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 275-283. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(94)0006-9.
Page, T. (2012). A shared place of discovery and creativity: Practices of contemporary art and design pedagogy. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 67-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01732.x
Prentice, R. (2010). The place of practical knowledge in research in art and design education. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4), 521-534.
Pritchard, T., Heatly, R., & Trigwell, K. (2005). How art, media and design students conceive of the relation between the dissertation and practice. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 4(1), 5-15. doi: 10.1386/adch.4.1.5/1
Provencen, A., & Provencen, M. (1984). Leonardo da Vinci: The artist, inventor, scientist in three-dimensional, movable pictures. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Purves, D., & Lotto, R. B. (2003). Why we see what we do: An empirical theory of vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Robson, J. M. (1966). Harriet Taylor and John Stuart Mill: Artist and scientist. Queen's Quarterly, 73, 167-86.
Räsänen, M. (1997). Building bridges. Experiential art understanding: a work of art as a means of understanding and constructing self. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Räsänen, M. (2005). Multi-roled and skilled teachers of art. International Journal of Education through Art, 1(1), 53-64. doi: 10.1386/etar.1.1.53/1.
Seago, A., & Dunne, A. (1999). New methodologies in art and design research: the object as discourse. Design Issues, 15(2), 11-17.
Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63–77. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5
Sullivan, G. (2009). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts. London: Sage Publications.
Tufte, E. R. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Grapics Press.
University of Lapland. (2013). Retrieved from:
http://www.ulapland.fi/InEnglish/Units/Faculty_of_Art_and_Design/Studies.iw.3
Uusiautti, S. (2012). Going with the research flow from Master’s thesis to Doctoral thesis and beyond. In K. Määttä (Ed.), Obsessed with the doctoral thesis. Supervision and support during the dissertation process (pp. 161-168). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Warburg, O. (1964). Experiments in biochemistry. In the excitement and fascination of science. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 33, 531-544.
Wood, J. (2000). The culture of academic rigour: does design research really need it? The Design Journal, 3(1), 44-57.

In-Text Citation: (Maatta, 2013)
To Cite this Article: Maatta, K. (2013). From an Artist into an Art Researcher. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(4), 261–273.

Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode