ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
In every ‘era’ innovations emerge which, due to the specific characteristics that distinguish them, have enormous impacts on the global economic system for a long period of time. Under specific conditions, these "radical" innovations are called general purpose technologies (GPT).
The present work investigates the essential characteristics of radical innovations, bringing out the elements that make such innovations disruptive with respect to the current economic paradigm. Then it analyzes the specific characters of the GPT, in order to establish which of the major radical innovations in history can actually be defined as GPT.
After having analyzed some of the most important economic models on GPT, we proceed with the analysis of the impact that these innovations have on the process of economic growth, constantly referring to the empirical evidence of the most recent studies
Acs Z., Audretsch D. (2003). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publichers
Anghion, H. (1998). On the Macroeconomic Effects of Major Technological Change, in General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, edited by E.Helpman, 121-144, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention in Nelson R.R., ed The rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 609-626
Arthur, W.B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events, Economic Journal 99, 11-31
Basu, S., Fernald, J., (2007). Information and Communications Technology as a General Purpose Technology: Evidence from US Industry Data, German Economic review, 8(2), 146-173
Beaundry, P., Doms, M., Lewis, E., (2010). Should the Personal Computer be Considered a Tecnological Revolution? Evidence From US Metropolitan Areas, Journal of Political Economy 118(5), 988-1036
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment, Regional Studies 39(1), 61-74
Breshnahan, T. (2012). Generality, Recombination and Re-Use in J. Lerner and S. Stern(eds) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited, 2012, University Chicago Press, 611-656
Breshnahan, T., Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General Purpose Technologies: Engine of Growth?, Journal of Econometrics, 65, 83-108
Bresnahan, T., Yin, P. (2010). Reallocating Innovative Resources Around Growth Bottlenecks, Journal of Econometrics 65(1), 83-108
Carlaw, K.I., Lipsey, R.G. (2002). Externalities, Technological Complementaries and Sustained Economic Growth, Research Policy 31, 1305-1315
Carlaw, K., Lipsey, R. (2006). GPT-Driven, Endogenous Growth, The Economic Journal 116(508), 155-174
Cave, S., SohEigeartaigh, S. (2018). An AI Race for Strategic Advantage: Rethoric and Risks, in AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society
Cohen, W., Klepper, S. (1992). The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress, Small Business Economics, 4, 1-14
Dabrowska, J., Fiegenbaum, I., Kutvonen, A. (2013), Mapping the Perception and Reality of Open Innovation, International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(6), 1-25
Dahlin, K., Behrens, D.M. (2005), When is a Innovation Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness, Research Policy, 34, 717-737
David, P. (1987) Some New Standards for the Economics of Standardization in the Information Age, in Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. (eds) Economic policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge University Press, 206-239
David, P. (1990), The Dynamo and the Computer: a Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox, American Economic Review, 80, 355-361
Dosi, G. (1982), Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: a Suggested Interpreatation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change, Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162
Einsenhardt, K., Martin, J. (2000), Dynamic Capabilities: What are They?, Strategic Management Journal, 21(11)
Fatas-Villafranca, F., Jarne, G., Sanchez-Choliz, J. (2011), Innovation Cycles and Growth, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(2), 1-27
Hall, B., Trajtenberg, M., (2004), Uncovering GPTs with Patent Data, Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research
Helpman, E. (1998), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M. (1998), A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies, in Helpman(eds) General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Inklaar, R., Timmer, M. (2007), Comparisons of Industry Output, Inputs and Productivity Levels, Economic Systems Research 19(3), 343-363
Jacobs, B., Nahuis, R. (2002), A General Purpose Technology Explains the Solow Paradox and Wage Inequality, Economics Letters, 74(2), 243-250
Jorgenson, D., Ho, M., Samuels, J., Stiroh, K. (2007), Industgry
In-Text Citation: (Laino, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Laino, A. (2019). General Purpose Technologies: Characteristics And Impact On Economic Growth. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 734–748.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode