Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Impact of Feminism on the Progress of Contemporary Employment Culture

Qaiser Mohi Ud Din

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/5921

Open access

Feminism plays a vital role in the workplaces around the globe and resulted in increased productivity due to the development of modern employment culture opted by successful organizations in the biosphere. This study is intended to examine the impact of feminism on development of modern employment culture of five multinational companies in Pakistan. Total 250 questionnaires were distributed and 200 respondents filled the questionnaire and response rate was eighty percent. By application of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), descriptive statistics, correlation among variables, one-way ANNOVA and multiple regression analysis were carried out on the compiled data and concluded on the impact of selected independent variables including mental health, career fulfilment, equality and adversity on modern employment culture. The results showed that all the variables were significantly correlated to each other and had positive correlations. The regression analysis showed that there was a significant relationship among the independent and dependent variables.
In spite of advances for women in the modern employment culture, a few elements keep on contrarily sway women’s' feeling of prosperity at work. These components incorporate gender discernment, gender job requirements, a male ruled work environment, and inflexibility. This section will survey ways a women's activist point of view may help them in the working environment by giving a challenge to contemporary role, giving a setting for segregation, and giving a feeling of competency in dealing with the workplace, maybe prompting a more noteworthy in general feeling of prosperity. In conclusion, utilizing the women's activist point of view, the section closes with certain suggestions for improving the work environment for women.


Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage – The in? uence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037-1061.
Frenkel, M. (2017). Gendering the MNC. Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives, 49, 357-388.
Friedman. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449-460.
Jenkins, B. & Gupta. (1983). Employee gender, gender similarity, and supervisor- subordinate cross evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 174-184.
Kashubeck-West, & Saunders. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-r ole orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of women, 30, 199-211.
Kashubeck-West, & Saunders. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-r ole orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psycology of Women, 30, 199-211.
Kathryn. (2013). A feminist response to late twentieth-century capitalism? Feminist Media Studies, 13, 395-414.
Mauthner. (1998). It’s a women’s cry for help: A relational perspective on postnatal depression. Feminism and Psychology, 8, 325-355.
Saunders, K. (2016). Women in the Workplace: Feminism’s Potential Impact. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht, 565-575.
Schneir, M. (1994). The Vintage Book of Feminism . London.
Stake, & Malkin. (2004). Changes in attitudes and self-con? dence in women’s and gender studies classroom. Sex Roles, 455-468.
Tyson, Z. & Hausmann. (2009). The global gender gap report . . World Economic Forum.
Zucker. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but. Psychology of women, 423-435.

In-Text Citation: (Din & Din, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Din, Q. M. U., & Din, Q. M. U. (2019). Impact of Feminism on the Progress of Contemporary Employment Culture. International Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 58–68.