ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Sisters in Islam (SIS), an organization that fights for the rights of women and gender equality, has provided opinions that goes against the fatwa and criticizes the Islamic law in Malaysia concerning several issues such as caurah, the fatwa and Hudud. The reasoning used by SIS is that the Islamic law is not humane and does not represent gender equality. However, the nature of humane and gender equality based on Islam violates the Maqasid Shariah. All arguments stated revolves around the acceptance of maslahah and refuses mafsadah. At the same time, the Islamic authorities stated otherwise with the same reason of maslahah or Maqasid Shariah. Therefore, this research analyses the usage of Maqasid Shariah by SIS and evaluates dawabi? Maqasid Shariah of SIS from the perspective of experts of the Islamic jurist on the issues of Islamic law. The methodology used is case study through qualitative approach. The datas are collected from websites, books, newspapers and articles by SIS. Besides, the data gathered are analyzed descriptively from 15 informants and uses the Atlas.ti software for coding datas of the interview. The research finds that a misunderstanding on the concept of “Jalb al-Masalih wa Dar al-Mafasid”. SIS basically does not understand the maqasid of implementing the laws of Islam in Malaysia. The experts of Islamic jurist states that SIS’s understanding in the issues of caurah, the fatwa, Hudud, drafting of Shariah Law on Moral Issue, judges and apostate does not comply within the parameters (dawabi?) of Maqasid Shariah.
Al-Qur’an
Ali, A.K. (2011). Fiqh Masyarakat Bukan Islam Di Malaysia. In. Kertas Kerja Tan Sri Syeikh Ghazali Abdul Rahman; Bukan Islam Dan Kehakiman Dalam Islam. Publisher Imtiyaz Multimedia, Shah Alam: Persatuan Ulama Malaysia.
Badrulhisham, A. & Mustafar, F. W. (2015). Maqasid Syar'iyyah Dalam Undang-Undang Kebebasan Beragama di Malaysia. Melaka: Kolej Universiti Islam Melaka. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316543191_Maqasid_Syar'iyyah_Dalam_Un dang-Undang_Kebebasan_Beragama_di_Malaysia.
Mokhtar, A. W. (2016). Parameter (al-Dawabit) Maqasid al-Shariah dalam Pentadbiran Negara. Dlm Seminar Nasional Maqasid al-Shariah 2016: Maqasid al-Shariah & Fiqh Demokrasi. Nilai: Institut Pengurusan dan Penyelidikan Fatwa Sedunia (INFAD).
Al-Zaydan, ‘A. K. (2013). Al-Wajiz fi Usul Fiqh. Lubnan : al-Risalah al-Naasyirun.
Anon. (1993). Islam, Gender and Human Rights: An Alternative Views. Kuala Lumpur: SIS Forum Berhad.
Bohlander, M. (2014). Sisters In Law - Using Maqasid Al-Shari’ah To Advance The Conversation Between Islamic And Secular Legal Thinking. Arab Law Quarterly (28).
Buti, M. S. R. (1998). Dawabit al-Maslahah fi al-Shariah al-Islamiyah. Damaskus, Syria: Dar al Fikr.
Foley, R. (2004). Muslim Women’s Challenges to Islamic Law. International Feminist Journal of Politics, Retrieved from doi:10.1080/1461674032000165932.
Zainal, M. H. & Jamal, J. (2014). Kedudukan Murtad dan Penyebaran Agama Bukan Islam Menurut Perspektif Undang-Undang di Malaysia?: Satu Analisa Isu dan
Cabaran. Malaysian Journal of Law and Society (2013), 13–36.
Ibrahim, I., Samsudin, M. A. & Alias, M. N. (2006). Kepentingan Dawabit al-Maslahah dalam Konteks Pembicaraan Maqasid al-Sharicah : Hubungan Antara Pemikiran al-Buti dan al-Shatibi. Prosiding International Conference on Islamic Jurisprudence and The Challenges Of The 21st Century: Maqasid al-Sharicah and Its Realization in Contemporary Societies. Kuala Lumpur: International Islamic University.
Muhammad, K. H. H. (2004). Fiqh Wanita: Pandangan Ulama Terhadap Wacana Agama dan Gender. Trans:Norhayati Haji Kaprwai & zaitun Mohamed kasim. Petaling Jaya: SIS.
Abdul Majid, L. & Stapa, Z. (2016). Mengenali Asas Liberalisme dan Pluralisme. In. Muhammad Faisal Ashaari (ed.). Islam?: Menangani Kepelbagaian, 31–45. Selangor: Pertubuhan Pendakwah Selangor.
Ismail, M. ANgalim, N. Q. binti M., Mokhtar, A. I. bin, & Samsudin, M. A. bin. (2019). The Representation of Maqasid Shariah by Sisters in Islam (SIS) from the Perspective of the Experts of Islamic Jurist. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 1254–1266.
n.p
Nordin, M. Z. F., Abdullah, S., & Mansor, M. (2013). Religious Liberalism in Sisters in Islam Discourse?: An Analysis on Identification. Proceeding of The International Conference on Social Science Research, (June), 1047–1063.
Musa, N. S. & Said, W. M. (2014). Impak Negatif Islam Liberal Terhadap Pengkajian Hukum, 1–14. Seremban: Universiti Teknologi Mara (UITM).
Kaprawi, N. (2012). Bila fatwa jadi bahan nista dan ketawa. Diakses dari http://www.thenutgraph.com/bila-fatwa-jadi-bahan-nista-dan-ketawa/Foley, R. (2004).
Muslim women’s challenges to Islamic Law. International Feminist Journal of Politics. Doi:10.1080/1461674032000165932.
Talib, O. (2013). ATLAS.ti: Pengenalan Analisis Data Kualitatif, 140 Ilustrasi Langkah Demi Langkah. Bandar Baru Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.
Md. Nor, S. Z. (2008). al-Shariah: Fiqh Jenayah. Selangor: Dawama Sdn. Bhd
Shihab, M. Q. (n.d). Tafsir al-Misbah: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian al-Quran. Ciputat: Publisher Lentera Hati.
Ngalim, N. Q. binti M., Mokhtar, A. I. bin, & Samsudin, M. A. bin. (2019). The Representation of Maqasid Shariah by Sisters in Islam (SIS) from the Perspective of the Experts of Islamic Jurist. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 1254–1266.
Al-Jazairi, Abu Bakar Jabir. (2007). Tafsir al-Quran al-Aysar (Surah Ali Imran hingga
In-Text Citation: (Ngalim, Mokhtar, & Samsudin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Ngalim, N. Q. binti M., Mokhtar, A. I. bin, & Samsudin, M. A. bin. (2019). The Representation of Maqasid Shariah by Sisters in Islam (SIS) from the Perspective of the Experts of Islamic Jurist. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 1254–1266.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode