ISSN: 2226-3624
Open access
This paper uses the lenses of Cultural-Historic Activity Theory to address the question: What is the value of an educational excursion for fourth year students enrolled in a 4 year BSc Economics program at Africa University in Zimbabwe? The excursion is an integral part of a fourth year Resource and Environmental Economics module.This article compares the nature of student learning during the excursion with students’ learning and interaction in the traditional formal lecture room as two different activity systems. Drawing on student reflections from the excursion evaluation forms, this study highlights and explores the unforeseen dynamics and tensions created during the excursion. It focuses on the importance of social interaction and illustrates that an excursion, with its more informal nature, and pedagogy of play and metaphors, offer learning opportunities not always possible in the formal lecture hall/ classroom.The major findings are that the excursion provides a different learning environment for personal and professional development; authentic learning associated with excursion can be promoted and supported by technology.
ALT-Association for Learning Technology(Oct,2010). “Technology in Learning : Aresponse to some questions from the Departmnet of Business Innovation and Skills”[online] http://www.repository.alt.ac.uk/839
Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A., & Baek, E.-O. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communities and technology (pp. 199–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Basharina, O. (2007). An Activity Theory Perspective on Student - Reported Contradictions in International Telecollaboration. Learning, Language, & Theory, 11 (2), 82-103.
Beatty, I. D. (2009) Illuminating teacher change and professional development with CHAT. Proceedings of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, 2009 Annual Meeting. April 17–21, Garden Grove, CA, USA.
Bower, M.(2008).”Affordance analysis – matching tasks with learning technologies”. Educational media international, Vol. 45, No. 1. [online] http://www.infoworld.com . DOI: 10.1080/09523980701847115
Capper, P. & Williams, B. (2004). Enhancing evaluation using systems concepts. American Evaluation Association. Available http://users.actrix.co.nz/bobwill/activity.doc [Accessed 17 August 2012]
Center for Activity Theory and Development Work Research (2003). The Activity System [Online]. Available at:
http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/activitysystem [Accessed 16 August 2012]
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical conceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
Engeström, Y. (1999) Innovative learning in work teams: analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice, in: Y. ENGESTRÖM et al (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 377-406.
Herrington, J & Kervin, L(2007) Authentic Learning Supported by Technology: Ten
suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms, Educational Media nternational, 44:3, 219-236, DOI: 10.1080/09523980701491666
Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. & Macaulay, C. (1999). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, 6(4), 27-39.
Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G., 1994. Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches
Lombardi, M.(May, 2007). “Authentic Learning for the 21st century : An overview” Educase Learning Initiative.
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), pp 373–384.
N’gambi et al.(in press).”Emerging Technologies in South African Higher Education InstitutionsTowards aTeaching and Learning Practice Framework”.
Russell, D. (2004). Looking Beyond The Interface Activity Theory and Distributed Learning. Routledge Falmer, London.
Sharples et al.(2012).”Innovating Pedagogy”The Open University. Innovate Report 1. Milton Keynes, UK.
Siemens, G. and Tittenberger, P. (2009) Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning – Emerging Technologies for Learning, [online],
http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/wikis/etl/index.php/Handbook_of_ Emerging_Technologies_for_Learning (accessed on 02/01/12).
Veletsianos, G. (2010) A Definition of ET for Education. In Veletsianos, G. (ed.) Emerging Technologies in Distance Education. Theory and Practice. Edmonton: AU Press, pp 1-22.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(Kandiero et al., 2014)
Kandiero, A., Ngendakumana, L., & Jagero, N. (2014). The Excursion and Lecture Hall as Two Activity Systems Compared: The Case of Resource and Environmental Economics Class at Africa University - Zimbabwe. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(2), 262–277.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode