ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Research on technostress has been extensively conducted in various fields. However, research on technostress is still lacking in the context of university online learning, specifically in Malaysian public universities. This study aims to develop a technostress-related instrument that suits the context of university students. This study has adopted and adapted the instrument of technostress from the previous researchers and validated the construct using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). A cross-sectional study was conducted on 338 undergraduate students in all UiTM branches in East Malaysia, using a simple random sampling method. A structured survey was used to gather the necessary information. The final analysis found that no items were omitted. Based on EFA, this study finalised the instrument to twenty-two (22) items yielding only four dimensions, i.e., techno-overload (9 items), techno-complexity (6 items), techno-insecurity (4 items), and techno-uncertainty (3 items). The high-reliability standards shown in Cronbach’s alpha for each component explain that the proposed instrument is reliable and suitable for measuring technostress constructs. The results have statistically proven that these items have a high level of validity and reliability and can be used to measure technostress among university students. This instrument developed in this study can be considered for future research to measure technostress in the context of university students as a better alternative than using existing instruments used on employees in ICT organisations.
Ahmad, U. N. U., & Amin, S. M. (2012). The Dimensions of Technostress among Academic Librarians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.121
Ahmad, U. N. U., Amin, S. M., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2012). The Relationship Between Technostress Creators and Organisational Commitment Among Academic Librarians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40(6), 182–186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.179
Bahkia, A. S., Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Foziah, H. (2019). Exploratory factor analysis on occupational stress in context of Malaysian sewerage operations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2138(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121111
Booker, Q. E., & State, M. (2014). a Model for Testing Technostress in the Online Education Environment: an Exploratory Study. Issues in Information Systems, 15(2), 214–222.
Chen, J. V., Tran, A., & Nguyen, T. (2019). Understanding the discontinuance behavior of mobile shoppers as a consequence of technostress: An application of the stress-coping theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 95(August 2018), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.022
Christ-Brendemühl, S., & Schaarschmidt, M. (2020). The impact of service employees’ technostress on customer satisfaction and delight: A dyadic analysis. Journal of Business Research, 117(June), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.021
Çoklar, A. N., Efilti, E., ?ahin, Y. L., & Akçay, A. (2016). Investigation of techno-stress levels of teachers who were included in technology integration processes. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2016(NovemberSpecialIssue), 1331–1339.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
Hauk, N., Göritz, A. S., & Krumm, S. (2019). The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213349
Hwang, I., & Cha, O. (2018). Examining technostress creators and role stress as potential threats to employees’ information security compliance. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.022
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers and Education, 95, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004
Juškait?, V. (2017). ICT use in the carers’ work: Technostress. Medical Physics in the Baltic States, 13(November), 56–61.
Kader, M. A. R. A., Aziz, N. N. A., & Dangi, M. R. M. (2020). Mediating effects of English proficiency on the association between religiosity commitment, study habits, self-study concept, and perceived stress. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(5), 219–232.
Khedhaouria, A., & Cucchi, A. (2019). Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101(April), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.029
Krishnan, S. (2017). Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.039
Li, L., & Wang, X. (2020). Technostress inhibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers’ work performance in higher education. Cognition, Technology and Work, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00625-0
Ma, Y., & Turel, O. (2019). Information technology use for work and technostress: effects of power distance and masculinity culture dimensions. Cognition, Technology and Work, 21(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0503-1
Mahapatra, M., & Pati, S. P. (2018). Technostress Creators and Burnout. SIGMIS-CPR’18, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209626.3209711
Maier, C., Laumer, S., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2019). Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: a two-wave study with multiple data samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(5), 496–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2019.1614739
Marchiori, D. M., Mainardes, E. W., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2019). Do Individual Characteristics Influence the Types of Technostress Reported by Workers? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(3), 218–230.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1449713
Nimrod, G. (2018). Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging and Mental Health, 22(8), 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037
Oh, S. T., & Park, S. (2016). A Study of the Connected Smart Worker’s Techno-stress. Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.065
Qi, C. (2019). A double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(12), 1337–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476
Setyadi, H. J., Widagdo, P. P., & Susanto, T. D. (2017). Cognitive age and chronological age of the technostress that effect on satisfaction, performance, and intention of continue the use of information technology in the university. Proceeding - 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology: Theory and Application of IT for Education, Industry and Society in Big Data Era, ICSITech 2017, 2018-Janua, 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257134
Stadin, M., Nordin, M., Broström, A., Magnusson Hanson, L. L., Westerlund, H., & Fransson, E. I. (2021). Technostress operationalised as information and communication technology (ICT) demands among managers and other occupational groups – Results from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). Computers in Human Behavior, 114(March 2020), 106486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106486
Syvänen, A., & Mäkiniemi, J. (2016). When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar.Net, 12(2).
Tarafdar, M., Maier, C., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Information Systems Journal, 30(1), 96–124.
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12253
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2010). Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403
Tu, B. Y. Q., Wang, K., & Shu, Q. I. N. (2005). Q I a N G T U , K a N L I a N G W a N G. 48(4), 77–82.
Wang, X., Tan, S. C., & Li, L. (2020). Technostress in university students’ technology-enhanced learning: An investigation from multidimensional person-environment misfit. Computers in Human Behavior, 105(November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106208
Warren, L., Reilly, D., Herdan, A., & Lin, Y. (2020). Self-efficacy, performance and the role of blended learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2019-0210
Zhao, X., Xia, Q., & Huang, W. (2020). Impact of technostress on productivity from the theoretical perspective of appraisal and coping processes. Information and Management, 1088, 103265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103265
In-Text Citation: (Aziz & Yazid, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Aziz, N. N. A., & Yazid, Z. N. A. (2021). Exploratory Factor Analysis of Technostress among University Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(3), 161–175.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode