Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

A Mixed Method Study of Students' Experiences with Online and Distance Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Malaysia

Tina Abdullah, Nazura Zunnurain Zukepeli, Norhanim Abdul Samat

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12974

Open access

Many people have been affected by the pandemic, particularly those in the education sector, which has seen higher education institutions shut down to prevent infection. During the closure, online and distant learning was implemented, and it has been ongoing since 2019. This new approach of disseminating information requires both instructors and learners to conform to the most recent teaching and learning process norm. The purposes of this study were to investigate ESL learners' attitudes toward online learning and the impact of online learning on them. The study's significant contribution could be to help instructors better understand how learners interact in the online classroom so that they can create the most appropriate teaching materials to fit their needs. Understanding their preferred method of learning would lead to increased engagement and improved learning results. Because of the growing importance of online learning management systems, this study could help to improve the quality of university education by studying how learners use it for online learning in their studies. The study adopted the mixed-method research design to survey 152 ESL undergraduates and interview ten of the respondents at a Malaysian public university. The findings revealed that many of the respondents were satisfied with their online language classes and felt at ease conversing in this situation. Many were unsure whether online learning was motivating, and half of them believed that online classes encouraged participation. However, several of the respondents struggled to complete group work since it was difficult for them to get to know one another. When given the option, most of them would prefer to learn in a face-to-face setting. This research would assist instructors in determining the most effective online teaching style and foster better empathy for students who face challenges beyond their control. This study is limited to undergraduate learners at a Malaysian public university. The closure of universities has a substantial impact on all institutions of higher learning. As a result, students all around the world face the same obstacles, but under different circumstances. Future research should focus on understanding how different higher education institutions in other countries contribute to online learning success. Besides, future research could examine into how learners view online learning during the pandemic and how it affects their ability to adapt and recover from learning setbacks. Instructors may be able to use the findings of this study to better understand students' perspectives and attitudes toward online learning, as well as to solve problems linked to online learning.

Allo, M. D. G. (2020). Is online learning good in the midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1-10.
Bakar, N. A., Latiff, H., & Hamat, A. (2013). Enhancing ESL learners speaking skills through an asynchronous online discussion forum. Asian Social Science, 9(9), 224.
Choo, L. P., Kaur, G., Fook, C. Y., & Yong, T. C. (2014). Patterns of interaction among ESL students during online collaboration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 307-314.
Clark, T. (2003). Disadvantages of collaborative online discussion and the advantages of sociability, fun and cliques for online learning. In Proceedings of the 3.1 and 3.3 working groups conference on International federation for information processing: ICT and the teacher of the future. Volume 23 (pp. 23-25).
Daniel, J. (2016). Making sense of flexibility as a defining element of online learning. Athabasca University https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/exploring-future-education/making-sense-flexibility-defining-element-online-learning.
Hannabuss, S. (1996), "Research interviews", New Library World, Vol. 97 No. 1129, pp. 22-30.
Kemp, N., & Grieve, K. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students' perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52-73.
Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching online: A practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Mahmood, F., Halim, H. A., Rajindra, S., & Ghani, M. M. (2014). Factors Affecting Teachers Utilization of Technology in Malaysian ESL Classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 15-23.
Mailizar, Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers' views on e-learning implementation barriers during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
Mathers, N. J., Fox, N. J., & Hunn, A. (1998). Surveys and questionnaires. NHS Executive, Trent.
Yunus, M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Factors affecting teaching English as a Second Language (TESL) postgraduate students' behavioural intention for online learning during the COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(6), 3524; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063524
Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile learning for education: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3(6), 93-101.9 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6), 3524.
Murugaiah, P., & Thang, S. M. (2010). Development of interactive and reflective learning among Malaysian online distant learners: An ESL instructor's experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 21-41.
Omar, H., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). ESL learners' interaction in an online discussion via Facebook. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 67.
Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and higher education, 13(4), 292-297.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715-742.
Smart, K. L., & Cappel, J. J. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 5(1), 201-219.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2004, March). Using mobile phones in education. 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. (pp. 3-10). IEEE.
Raju, V. N., & Harinarayana, N. S. (2016). Online survey tools: A case study of Google Forms. In National Conference on Scientific, Computational & Information. Research Trends in Engineering, GSSS-IETW, Mysore.
Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, 2, 235-251.

In-Text Citation: (Zukepeli et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Zukepeli, N. Z., Abdullah, T., & Samat, N. A. (2022). A Mixed Method Study of Students’ Experiences with Online and Distance Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 347–359.