ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
A pilot study was conducted to validate and examine the reliability of the instrument for teacher leader evaluation. The instrument consisted of 109 items and was distributed to 50 teachers. This instrument was developed to measure three (3) constructs; i) teacher commitment in the concept of teacher leadership ii) competence of teachers in the concept of teacher leadership and iii) emotional intelligence of teachers in the concept of teacher leadership. Through this approach, respondent and item reliability been measured with more accurate than using Alpha Cronbachs' value. Rasch Measurement Model (using Winstep version 3.69.1.11) measured the reliability and separation item- respondent, Point Measure Correlation (PTMEA CORR), fitness of item to measure the construct (outfit Mean-Square or MNSQ) and Standardized Residual Correlation. This approach allows expelled of item that not follow the requirement based on the diagnosis. Final result of analysis, out of 109 item, 17 item need to be expelled and the rest of the item, which is 92 item are suitable to measure three (3) constructs in the concept of teacher leadership. A total of 50 teachers were selected as respondents. All respondents involved in this pilot study were not selected in the actual sample.
Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition. Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. In Learning Policy Institute (Issue June).
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Teacher Leadership Self-Assessment (TLSA). In Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders.
Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (2017). How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8
Linacre, J. M. (2010). Predicting responses from rasch measures. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(1), 1–10.
Lowe, N. K. (2019). What Is a Pilot Study? JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 48(2), 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2019.01.005
Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the Pilot Study: A Neglected Part of the Research Process? Methodological Findings Supporting the Importance of Piloting in Qualitative Research Studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341
Masry-Herzallah, A., & Da’as, R. (2020). Cultural values, school innovative climate and organizational affective commitment: a study of Israeli teachers. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0302
Miller, L. A., Lovler, R. L., & McIntire, S. A. (2013). Foundations of psychological testing: a practical approach (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Mohd, A. B., Nawawi, A. B. M., & Ismail, D. S. N. B. (2017). Tahap Efikasi Guru Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Sekolah Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Dalam Daerah Bachok. Proceedings of the ICECRS. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.500
Norashikin, A. B., Ramli, B., & Foo, S. F. (2015). Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Norashikin. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET).
Nurtanto, M., Arifin, Z., Sofyan, H., Warju, W., & Nurhaji, S. (2020). Development of model for professional competency assessment (Pca) in vocational education: Study of the engine tune-up injection system assessment scheme. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.02.004
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated Learning Scale (The Comparison of Aiken Index and Expanded Gregory Index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(22), 155–164.
http://routerjcs.nctu.edu.tw/router/word/11542212017.pdf
Van Lankveld, T., Schoonenboom, J., Volman, M., Croiset, G., & Beishuizen, J. (2017). Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
In-Text Citation: (Bakar et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Ariff, N., Mansor, M., & Yunus, J. @ N. (2022). The Use of Rasch Measurement Model for The Validity and Reliability Teacher Leadership Instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(2), 979- 991.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode