Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

The Application of Mayer’s Multimedia Learning Theory to Digital Presentation Tools: Prezi for Industrial Design Programme in Higher Education

Teo Pei Kian, Tan Su Huey

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/14042

Open access

This paper will discuss the application of Mayer’s multimedia learning (MML) theory into digital presentation tools: Prezi. The discussion will be focusing on Industrial Design (ID) education. The MML theory use different media like text, pictures, video, animation, and sound to serve as a guideline for designing Prezi. Recently, the rapid development of digital products has changed the way of teaching and learning. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to develop a prototype of Prezi with MML for ID programme as lecturing tools and to investigate the effect of integrating MML in Prezi on student’s engagement in the learning of Industrial Design process. This paper compiles secondary data on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers; reviews existing research on the topic; and theoretical approaches. A prototype development of Prezi will be created with requirement analysis according to the content of ID programme. During the process, the six design principles (Coherence principle, Signaling principle, Redundancy principle, Spatial contiguity principle, Segmenting principle, and Modality principle) which is derived from cognitive theory of multimedia learning was analyzed and used as a guideline for designing the prototype. In the finding, a significant difference was determined in the formative, summative, and delayed summative evaluations of the combination of Prezi and MML theory.

Aldoy, N., & Evans, M. (2011). A review of digital industrial and product design methods in UK higher education. The Design Journal, 14(3), 343-368.
Baker, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bowman, N. D. (2018). Does teaching with PowerPoint increase students' learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 126, 376-387.
Barak, M. (2018). Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers & Education, 121, 115-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.016.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
Angelo, C. D. (2018). The impact of technology: student engagement and success. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018.
Chou, P.-N., Chang, C.-C., & Lu, P.-F. (2015). Prezi versus PowerPoint: The effects of varied digital presentation tools on students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 91, 73-82.
Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., & Boudhraâ, S. (2016). A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. Design Studies, 47, 164-186.
Dumas, A. (2000). Theory and practice of industrial design. Innoregio Project, 1, 22.
Elizabeth. T. (2019). 7 Best Presentation Tools for Students. Pro Tips.
https://www.schoology.com/blog/7-best-presentation-tools-students
Grech, V. (2018). The application of the Mayer multimedia learning theory to medical PowerPoint slide show presentations. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 41(1), 36-41. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1408400. doi:10.1080/17453054.2017.1408400
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.
Issa, N., Schuller, M., Santacaterina, S. (2011). Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Medical education, 45(8), 818-826.
Robinson, J., Dusenberry, L., Hutter, L., Lawrence, H., Frazee, A., & Burnett, R. E. (2019). State of the field: Teaching with digital tools in the writing and communication classroom. Computers and Composition, 54, 102511.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning: Cambridge university press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
Nanni, A. (2015). Teaching through the use of cloud-based animation software. English Language Education in ASIA: Reflections and Directions. P. 1-11.
Nora, S. (2014) Using Prezi In Higher Education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 11 (2), 95-98.
Perron, B. E., & Steaens, A. (2010). A review of a presentation technology: Prezi. Research on Social Work Practice, 1-2.
Prezi. (2019). Retrieved from URL. https://prezi.com/
Ramlatchan, M. (2019). Multimedia learning theory and instructional message design. In M. Ramlatchan (Ed.), Instructional Message Design: Theory, Research, and Practice (Vol.1). Norfolk, VA: Kindle Direct Publishing.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structure of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1-15.

In-Text Citation: (Kian & Huey, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Kian, T. P., & Huey, T. S. (2022). The Application of Mayer’s Multimedia Learning Theory to Digital Presentation Tools: Prezi for Industrial Design Programme in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(2), 992 - 1001.