ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This study examined pre-service teachers' views on how the station rotation model learning environment enhances their critical thinking skills. This research studied how a learning environment coupled with blended learning and a social learning environment improves teachers’ performance. The participants were 54 pre-service teachers who took part in a quasi-experimental study; the participants received intervention on a station rotation model with a blended social learning environment (SRM-BSCLE). Face-to-face interview data were collected from six (6) pre-service teachers selected based on high, medium, and low-performance criteria. The obtained data were analyzed using thematic analysis; the qualitative data indicated that pre-service teachers’ views on the learning environment comprised of station rotation model, collaborative learning, blended learning, and Vygotsky’s social interaction Zone of Proximal Teacher Development (ZPTD). The study shows that the six pre-service teachers who took part in the interview were able to identify the theoretical components of the research objectives in this research. This includes collaborative learning, blended learning, station rotation model, constructivist approach to teaching, and teaching aids. Thus, the findings obtained from this study were discussed within the frame of the relevant literature. There made on designing a learning environment that can enhance the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers.
Akinbobola, A., & Asagha, E. (2013). Promotion of Blended Learning Usage in Science Teaching In Nigeria: Some Inhibiting Factors. Paper presented at the International Conference on Arts, Economics and Management, UAE.
Akinoglu, O., & Karsantik, Y. (2016). Pre-Service Teachers' Opinions on Teaching Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 61-76.
Abuhassna, H., & Yahaya, N. (2018). Students’ utilization of distance learning through an interventional online module based on Moore transactional distance theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3043–3052. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91606.
Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W.M., Yahya, N. et al. (2020b). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
Abuhassna, H., Megat, A., Yahaya, N., Azlina, M., & Al-rahmi, W. M. (2020a). Examining Students' satisfaction and learning autonomy through web-based courses. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 1(9), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/53912020.
Abuhassna, H., Awae, F., Alsharif, A. H., Yahaya, N., & Alnawajha, S. (2022a). Understanding Online Learning Engagement and Challenges during COVID19: Qualitative Evidenc. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 651–661.
Abuhassna, H., & Awae, F. (2021). The Effect of Employing Animated Films in Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language (AFL) to Non-Native Speakers in Thailand Schools. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 5(2), 1–10. Retrieved from https://itlj.utm.my/index.php/itlj/article/view/65
Abuhassna, H., Awae, F., Zitawi, D. U. D. Al, Bayoumi, K., & Alsharif, A. H. (2022b). Hybrid Learning for Practical-based Courses in Higher Education Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 1055–1064.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2021b). Neuromarketing: Marketing research in the new millennium. Neuroscience Research Notes, 4(3), 27-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v4i3.79
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., & Alharthi, R. H. E. (2021e). Neuromarketing research in the last five years: a bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1978620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1978620
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., Alsharif, Y. H., & Abuhassna, H. (2021g). A bibliometric analysis of neuromarketing: Current status, development, and future directions. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 11(3), 670-689. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v11-i3/11673
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., Abuhassna, H., & Alsharif, Y. H. (2022). Neuromarketing in Malaysia: Challenges, limitations, and solutions. International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 2022, Chiangrai, Thailand. 740-745. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/dasa54658.2022.9765010
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., Abuhassna, H., & Hashem, A. R. E. (2022). A global research trends of neuromarketing: 2015-2020. Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 15-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26441/rc21.1-2022-a1
Basogain, X., Olabe, M. Á., Olabe, J. C., & Rico, M. J. (2018). Computational Thinking in pre-university Blended Learning classrooms. Computers in human behavior, 80, 412-419.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The internet and higher education, 27, 1-13.
Byndas, O. (2017). Strategy for foreign language blended learning implementation into the educational process. Science and Education, 26(6), 95-99.
Cakir, H. (2013). Use of blogs in pre-service teacher education to improve student engagement. Computers & Education, 68, 244-252.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.013
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context, 1, 39-64.
Dantes, C. (2015). Models and principles are utilized to create constructivist-collaborative learning within Second Life. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation), Capella University, ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway. (3714739).
Daouk, Z., Bahous, R., & Bacha, N. N. (2016). Perceptions on the effectiveness of active learning strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(3), 360–375. http://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2015-0037
Demiral, U. (2018). Examination of Critical Thinking Skills of Preservice Science Teachers: A Perspective of Social Constructivist Theory. Journal of Education and learning, 7(4), 179.
Fang, A.-D., Chen, G.-L., Cai, Z.-R., Cui, L., & Harn, L. (2017). Research on Blending Learning Flipped Class Model in Colleges and Universities Based on Computational Thinking — “Database Principles” for Example. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5747-5755. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.01024a
Forsyth, I. (2014). Teaching and learning materials and the Internet. Ney York: Routledge.
Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189-201.
Gaspari?, R. P., & Pe?ar, M. (2016). Analysis of an asynchronous online discussion as a supportive model for peer collaboration and reflection in teacher education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 369–393. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994336705&partnerID=40&md5=a06be068ac68e1e7e038dcd4709a20c0
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596-4603.
Hong, S., & Yu, P. (2017). Comparison of the effectiveness of two styles of case-based learning implemented in lectures for developing nursing students’ critical thinking ability: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 68, 16-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.008
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools: John Wiley & Sons.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning: Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Khalid, A., & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist vs traditional: effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170-177.
Kim, K., Sharma, P., Land, S. M., & Furlong, K. P. (2013). Effects of Active Learning on Enhancing Student Critical Thinking in an Undergraduate General Science Course. Innovative Higher Education, 38(3), 223-235. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9236-x
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, media and technology, 39(1), 6-36.
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
Kucuk, S., & Sahin, I. (2013). From the perspective of community of inquiry framework: An examination of Facebook uses by pre-service teachers as a learning environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2).
Lee, M. F., Shariffudin, R. S., & Mislan, N. (2012). Pattern and relationship between multiple intelligences, personality traits and critical thinking skills among high achievers in Malaysia.
MacKinnon, S. (2002). Technology Integration in the Classroom Is There Only One Way to Make It Effective?. TechKnowLogia, 57-60.
Malik, A., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Permanasari, A., Samsudin, A., Safitri, D., Hermita, N. (2018). Using hot lab to increase pre-service physics teacher’s critical thinking skills related to the topic of RLC circuit. In S. Aisyah, R. Megasari, D. Kusumawaty, A. Jupri, L. Rusyati, R. Rosjanuardi, … E. Nuraeni (Eds.), 4th International Seminar of Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education, MSCEIS 2017 (1st ed., Vol. 1013). Institute of Physics Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012023
Mandusic, D., & Blaskovic, L. (2015). The impact of collaborative learning to critically thinking. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 13(1), 426-428.
Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., & Tanniru, M. (1999). Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS quarterly, 365-395.
Nechita, E., Nicuta, D., Ifrim, I. L., Pacurari, D., & Crisan, G. C. (2014). On Blended Collaborative Learning, a Case Study: A Project on Raising Awareness Regarding GMOs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3322-3326.
Noh, N. M. K.-T. W., Yeop, M. A., Abdullah, Z. (2016). Blended learning: its implementation and promote continuing e-learning environment among student-teachers. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(11), 12-15.
Omiola, M. A., Enuwa, M. R., Awoyemi, S. O., Adebayo, R. F. (2012). Effects of Blended Learning and Individualized Instructional Strategies on the Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Basic Technology. Brtitish Journal of Science, 6(1), 38-44.
Pearson, P. D., Ferdig, R. E., Blomeyer, J. R. L., & Moran, J. (2005). The Effects of Technology on Reading Performance in the Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis With Recommendations for Policy. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).
Pellas, N., & Boumpa, A. (2017). Blending the CoI model with Jigsaw technique for pre-service foreign language teachers’ continuing professional development using Open Sim and Sloodle. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 939–964.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9465-1
Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., Verma, S. (2015). Blending Learning: The Evolution of Online and Face-to-Face Education from 2008-2015. Promising Practices in Blended and Online Learning Series. International association for K-12 online learning.
Regha, I. O. (2015). Adoption of blended learning into the nigerian education system: prospects and challenges International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 1(1), 129-142.
lSadeghi, M. R. (2012). The effects of cooperative learning on critical thinking in an academic context. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 20(2), 15.
Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Clay Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165-178.
Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Kreis, A. (2018). What Are the Effects of Science Lesson Planning in Peers? Analysis of Attitudes and Knowledge Based on an Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 619–636.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9581-3
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute.
Styron, R. A. (2014). Critical Thinking and Collaboration: A Strategy to Enhance Student Learning. Systemics, Cybernetics And Informatics, 12(1), 25-30.
Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2017). Internet and Higher Education Comparing the use of a social annotation tool and a threaded discussion forum to support online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 72–79.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.10.001
Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Mokhtar, M. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 416-425.
Tomlinson, B., & Whittaker, C. (2013). Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: London: Brithish Council.
Truitt, A. A. (2016). A Case Study of the Station Rotation Blended Learning Model in a Third Grade Classroom. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertations), University of Northern Colorado, Colorado. (365).
Umoh, J. B., & Akpan, E. T. (2014). Challenges of Blended E-Learning Tools in Mathematics: Students’ Perspectives University of Uyo. Journal of Education and learning, 3(4), 60.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Walne, M. B. (2012). Emerging blended-learning models and school profiles. Houston: Community Foundation. Retrieved from www. edustart. org, 1(1), 1-26.
Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2018). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691–697. http://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632
Zhou, G., Xu, J., & Martinovic, D. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ capacity in teaching science with technology through microteaching lesson study approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 85–103. http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00605a
In-Text Citation: (Mamman et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Mamman, B., Abuhassna, H., Umara, K., Mustapha, A. M., Awae, F., Ali, A. S., Radzi, M. B. P., Alshehhi, A.M. A. A., Almheiri, A. S. B. H. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views on How the Station Rotation Model with a Blended Social Learning Environment (SRM-BSCLE) Enhances their Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(2), 1298 - 1334.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode