ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This paper is to investigate and understand perspectives held by a diverse group of people in a multicultural school setting in Malaysia. It examined the understanding of, and attitudes towards language diversity of school administrators, teachers and students in a specific school setting. The study drew on literature in the field of multi/interculturalism, and used a qualitative case study approach employing an interview approaches. The paper examined the concept of language diversity as a social phenomenon and links current understanding of the phenomenon to that of the people involved, explaining how and why they think, respond and react the way they do. A national primary school was chosen for the case study. In Malaysia, the government has embarked on an ambitious program to promote national primary schools as ‘a school of choice’ as an attempt to promote ‘unity in diversity’. School administrators, teachers, and students of this particular type of school were interviewed and the data analysed. The respondents practice Bahasa Melayu and English as the main medium of communication (lingua franca) and as a reflection on the increasing importance of this, they expect all students to take advantage and benefit from learning them both. However, the social factors and different environments are somehow conclusively determined to influence the way the language is used and learned by young children in MNS. Many Indians and some Chinese students, who came from the lower social background and speak their ‘mother-tongue’ at home, seem to experience difficulty in communication with people of the other race, especially during the classroom teaching and learning. At the end, the respondents drew attention to the way in which racial integration in MNS might be deteriorating, possibly by the use of the first language or/and the diversity of the language used in the school.
Abdul, R. A., Norhasni, Z. A., Zalizan, M. J., & Anisa, S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives toward schools diversity. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4): 178–189.
Chan, S. H., & Ain, N. A. (2015). Bilingualism in Malaysia: Language education policy andlocal needs. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 23(S): pp. 55 – 70.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gill, S. K. (2014). Language policy challenges in multi-ethnic Malaysia. Netherlands: Springer.
Jamil, H., & Raman, S. R. (2012). Malaysian educational policy for national integration: Contested terrain of multiple aspirations in a multicultural nation. Journal of Language and Culture, 3(1): 20-31.
Lasagabaster, D. (2015). Different Educational Approaches to Bi- or Multilingualism and Their Effect on Language Attitudes. Springer, Cham: pp. 13-30.
Md, Y., N., & Esmaeil, Z. J. (2017). Reconstructing multiculturalism in Malaysia through visual culture. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4-1): 99-105.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Executive summary: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education).
Nair, M. (2018). Yes Malay is important but, don’t neglect English and Mandarin. Retrieved January 7, 2019, from https://www.freemalaysiatoday.
Paine, L. (1989). Orientation towards diversity: What do prospective teachers bring? Retrieved from https://ncrtl.msu.edu/reports/html/pdf/rr899.pdf.
Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-Undang Malaysia. (2006). Akta 32 Akta Bahasa Kebangsaan 1963/67. Kuala Lumpur: Author.
Phan, L. H., Kho, J., & Ching, B. (2013). Nationbuilding, English as an international language, medium fo instruction and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways forward. Journal Pertanika, 28(S2): 197 - 215.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. Oxford, Blackwell.
Said, S. B., & Ong, T. W. S. (2019). Creative Language Forms on Signboards in Singapore and Malaysia. Interface-Journal of European Languages and Literatures, 9(1).
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5): 1763-1768.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Sisamouth, W. K. (2017). Attitudes towards Thai, Patani Malay, and English of Thai Undergraduates: A Case Study at Prince of Songkla University Pattani Campus, Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publication: 433-466.
Ya’acob, A., Mohd, A., N. A., Idris, F., Hassan, Z., Kaur, S., & Noor, M. M. (2011). The role of the language of unity at higher education institution: Malaysian experience. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15: 1457-1461.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Zein, S., & Damanhuri, A. (2019). The Language Attitude of Adolescence. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-19.2019.60.
In-Text Citation: (Hashim, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Hashim, A. T. (2022). The Influence of Language Practices on Social Interaction in School Environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 966–976.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode