ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
In the 21st century, papers are no longer simply created on paper and ink; they may also be extracted from discs, memory cards in computers, smartphones, and other devices and sent to other people in both tangible and intangible forms, such as electronic documents. The use of electronic documents has become so widespread that laws are developed to take them into account. In this age of big data, electronic documents have been acknowledged as a sort of documentary evidence, and regulations governing electronic evidence have been modified in terms of its authenticity and weight, or evidential value. In terms of law, documentary evidence is recognised as one type of evidence. Sekolah Kebangsaan (F) Bukit Jalor has been selected for this case study as a way to further explore these issues. This is relevant to the study's objectives, which include examining public servants' knowledge of the use of digital documents as evidence in governmental institutions, particularly in the field of education. The findings of the study employ SPSS as a tool for the purpose of measuring the discussed components. These includes concerning the issues of authenticity, acceptance, and admissibility of digital documents, as well as the method that is established for classifying digital documents, the pertinent aspects that are investigated for this study. The results of this study can be utilized to investigate the level of comprehension and awareness of digital document management as evidence among public officials in their respective areas of responsibility, which include the administration of schools as well as teaching and learning in schools in general. In conclusion, the respondent's grasp of digital documents and their level of awareness as evidence are commensurate with the progression of technology used in public services.
Abd Manaf, Z., and Ismail, A. (2010), "Malaysian cultural heritage at risk? A case study of digitisation projects", Library Review, Vol. 59 (2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011023862
Gingrande, A. (2010). Digital Documents and the Best Evidence Rule. Document Strategy. Retrieved from https://documentmedia.com/article-180-Digital-Documents-and-the-Best- Evidence-Rule.html
Gouanou, M., and Marsh, M. (2004). ‘’Imploding technologies – driven by the records management requirements?’’, Records Management Journal, 14,( 2), 62 - 64.
Chissick, M., & Kelman, A. (2000). Electronic Commerce Law and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1604/9780421708006
Fawwaz, M. (2008). ‘’Al-Wajiz fi al-Uqud al-Tijarah alElektroniyyah’’. ‘Amman: Dar al-Thaqafah, hlm 204.
Ismail, W. A. F. W., & Ramlee, Z. (2013). Keterangan Melalui Kit?bah: Menurut Fiqh dan Undang-Undang Semasa di Malaysia. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 17, 1.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33341201.pdf
Ismail, W., Abdul. Fattah, W. (2016). ‘’Penerimaan dan Kekuatan Dokumen Elektronik dalam Pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia’’. Jurnal Kanun, 28 (2), 338-355.
In-Text Citation: (Bunawan et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Bunawan, A.-A., Razak, N., Endin, M. Z., Mustaffar, M. Y., & Hashim, N. (2022). A Primary School Case Study on Difficulties of Using the Digital Document as Evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 1520–1528.
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode