Teachers and Crowdsourcing Platform: Using UTAUT to Examine Behaviour Intention and Use Behaviour

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324.
Almaiah, M., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A., & Khawatreh, S. (2020). Mobile government adoption model based on combining GAM and UTAUT to explain factors according to adoption of mobile government services. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(3), 199-225
Amir, R. I. M., Mohd, I. H., Saad, S., Seman, S. A. A., & Besar, T. B. H. T. (2019). Perceives Ease of Use, Perceive Usefulness, and Behavioural Intention: The Acceptance of Crowdsourcing Platform by Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). EasyChair Preprint no. 1611
Arshad, N. H., Salleh, S. S., Janom, N., Aris, S. R. S., & Mastuki, N. (2014). Issues and Challenges in Crowdsourcing Platform Implementation in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science (ACACOS '14), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28).
Barry, J. S. (2014). Crowdsourcing in the 21st Century. CPA Journal, 84(4), 5-5.
Benitez, J. Henseler, J., Castillo, A. & F. Schuberth (2020) How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57 (2). 103168.
Beucheler, T., Ruchslin, R., & Pfeifer, R. (2011, August). Modeling and simulating crowdsourcing as a complex biological system: Human crowds manifesting collective intelligence on the internet. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Paris, France.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward A Next Generation of Insights. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 471-482.
Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2009). A Causal Model of Human Capital Antecedents and Consequents in the Financial Services Industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10, 53-69.
Busarovs, A. (2011). Crowdsourcing as User-Driven Innovation, New Business Philosophy's Model. Journal of Business Management(4), 53-60.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
Cramer, J. S. (1987). Mean and variance of R2 in small and moderate samples. Journal of econometrics, 35(2-3), 253-266.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical model. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Di Guardo, M. C., & Castriotta, M. (2013). The Challenge and Opportunities Of Crowdsourcing Web Communities: An Italian Case Study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 4(1), 79-91.
Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gaal, Z., Szabo, L., Obermayer-Kovacs, N., & Csepregi, A. (2015). Exploring the role of social media in knowledge sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 185-197.
Ghosh, R. (2019). Understanding consumers'behaviour towards online shopping: the unified theory of acceptance & use of technology (UTAUT) perspective. Journal of the Gujarat Research Society, 21(13), 817-837.
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117 (3), 442-458.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Edition ed.): Sage publications.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling: saGe publications.
Hasan, S., Zhan, X., & Ukkusuri, S. V. (2013). Understanding urban human activity and mobility patterns using large-scale location-based data from online social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing, Chicago Illinois, USA
Hassan, H., Aris, S., Arshad, N., Janom, N., & Salleh, S. (2017). Conceptual Model for a Sustainable Crowdsourcing Ecosystem. PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 25, 89-98.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-320). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Ibrahim, A., Sulaiman, W. S. W., & Halim, F. W. (2019). Work Intention as Mediator in the Relationship between Work Passion and Organisational Commitment among Teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2S10), 102-110.
Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 720-739.
Ismail, I., Azizan, N., S., & Azman, N. (2011). Internet as an Influencing Factor of Teachers' Confidence in Using ICT. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 59-73.
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6), 1-4.
Howe, J. (2009). Crowdsourcing: Why The Power of the Crowd is Driving the Furture Business. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Jiang, Y., Schlagwein, D., & Benatallah, B. (2018). A Review on Crowdsourcing for Education: State of the Art of Literature and Practice. Paper presented at Conference: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) 2018. Yokohama, Japan
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khalid, K., Ismail, R., Mat-Jizat, J. E., & Abasm B. (2021). Examining Teachers Acceptance of Exam Building Crowdsourcing Platform through the Utaut Model: The Case of Krumun. Org.Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 2841-2851.
Khechine, H., & Augier, M. (2019). Adoption of a social learning platform in higher education: an extended UTAUT model implementation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu.
Kim, J., & Lee, K. S.-S. (2020). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers' adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-15.
Kingdom, S. (2022). Statistics Kingdom. https://www.statskingdom.com/
Lv, H. Z., & Luo, J. (2021). Creative approaches in music teaching: possibilities of Web 2.0 technologies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100840.
Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R. & Dellarocas, C., (2009). Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence, MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4732-09.
Mansor, M. F., Halim, H. A., & Ahmad, N. H. (2018). Leveraging crowdsourcing practices in small and medium enterprises (smes). Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(4), 1-11.
Marinkovic, V., Dordevic, A., & Kalinic, Z. (2020). The moderating effects of gender on customer satisfaction and continuance intention in mobile commerce: a UTAUT-based perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(3), 306-318.
McAfee, A. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organisation's toughest challenges.USA: Harvard Business Press.
Moksony, F. (1999). Small is Beautiful: The Use and Interpretation of R2 in Social Research. Review of Sociology, Special issue, 130-138.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
Muhdi, L., Daiber, M., Friesike, S., & Boutellier, R. (2011). The crowdsourcing process: an intermediary mediated idea generation approach in the early phase of innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(4), 315-332.
Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Rumor Theoretic Analysis of Tweets During Social Crises. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 407-A407.
Othman, Z., & Sivasubramaniam, V. (2019). Depression, anxiety, and stress among secondary school teachers in Klang, Malaysia. Int Med J, 26(2), 71-74.
Pollok, P., Luttgens, D., & Piller, F. T. (2019). How firms develop capabilities for crowdsourcing to increase open innovation performance: The interplay between organisational roles and knowledge processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(4), 412-441.
Purwanto, E., & Loisa, J. (2020). The intention and use behaviour of the mobile banking system in Indonesia: UTAUT Model. Technology Reports of Kansai University, 62(06), 2757-2767.
Prester, J., Schlagwein, D., and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2019). Crowdsourcing for education: literature review, conceptual framework, and research agenda. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden.
Raman, A., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2018). FROG VLE: Teachers' technology acceptance using utaut model. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 529-538.
Rubin, A., & Brown, A. (2019). Unlocking the Future of Learning by Redesigning Educator Learning. In Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education (pp. 235-268). Cham, Denmark: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saxton, G. D., Oh, O., & Kishore, R. (2013). Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control. Information Systems Management, 30(1), 2-20.
Shafie, S., Kadir, S. A., & Asimiran, S. (2017). Workload of technical secondary school teachers: management and administration's perceptions. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 2(4), 21-35.
Shah, S. N. A., Khan, A. U., Khan, B. U., Khan, T., & Xuehe, Z. (2020). Framework for teachers' acceptance of information and communication technology in Pakistan: Application of the extended UTAUT model. Journal of Public Affairs(e2090), 1 - 11.
Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 1(2), 187-196.
Shen, X.-L., Lee, M. K., & Cheung, C. M. (2014). Exploring online social behavior in crowdsourcing communities: A relationship management perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 144-151.
Soh, P. Y., Heng, H. B., Selvachandran, G., Chau, H. T. M., Abdel-Baset, M., Manogaran, G., & Varatharajan, R. (2020). Perception, acceptance and willingness of older adults in Malaysia towards online shopping: A study using the UTAUT and IRT models. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanised computing, 1-13.
Shuen, A. (2018). Web 2.0: A Strategy Guide: Business thinking and strategies behind successful Web 2.0 implementations. Canada: O'Reilly Media.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Teck-Chai, L., Kim-Hong, Y., & Ching-Ching, C. (2010). Exploring Malaysian Trainee Teachers' Adoption of the Internet as Information Tool. International Journal of Instruction. 3(2), 25-38.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilisation. MIS quarterly, 125-143.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 271-360.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443-488.
Zakariah, Z., Janom, N., Arshad, N. H., Salleh, S. S., & Aris, S. R. S. (2014, December). Crowdsourcing: The Trend of Prior Studies. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Artificial Ontelligence with Aplication in Engineering and Technology, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Zdravkova, K. (2020). Ethical issues of crowdsourcing in education. Journal of Responsible Technology, 2-3, 100004.
Zualkernan, I. A., Raza, A., & Karim, A. (2012). Curriculum-guided Crowd Sourcing of Assessments in a Developing Country. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 14-26.

In-Text Citation: (Khalid et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Khalid, K., Ismail, R., & Jizat, J. E. M. (2023). Teachers and Crowdsourcing Platform: Using UTAUT to Examine Behaviour Intention and Use Behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1), 1930–1946.

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode