ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Problem-solving mastery is deemed a key skill by the year 2025. In the future, the use of automation technology and machines are expected to completely replace existing jobs such as Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0) and 5G. This situation promotes computational thinking as a 21st-century thinking skill in education. However, research on the factors that influence students' computational thinking is still limited. Accordingly, this study aims to systematically analyze the factors influencing students' computational thinking through a systematic literature review and develop a conceptual framework based on the main factors outlined. A total of three databases such as Scopus, WoS, and ERIC were used in the screening of articles for a period of ten years (2022–2012). The PRISMA model used includes four levels comprising the identification, screening, eligibility, and data entry strategies. A total of 11 articles were identified from 111 articles, which met the specified criteria. The findings of the study showed 19 factors that influenced students' computational thinking. The conceptual framework was developed based on the most dominant approaches such as digital literacy, STEM awareness, and individual factors. This study has implications for teaching practices through the increased reinforcement of training techniques based on more effective computational thinking. In fact, the findings can provide expected data to design interventions that are more suitable for students at school. In addition, further research can also be done through the development of modules to train teachers and students to use computational thinking in the right manner so that thinking exercises can be carried out accordingly.
Afshari, M., Ghavifekr, S., Siraj, S., & Jing, D. (2013). Students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted Language Learning. Proceed - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103(May 2015), 852–859.
Booth, A. (2016). Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews, 5(1). doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x
Chou, P. N. (2019). Using Scratch-Jr to Foster Young Children’s Computational Thinking Competence: A Case Study in a Third-Grade Computer Class.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 570–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119872908
Gong, D., Yang, H. H., & Cai, J. (2020). Exploring the key influencing factors on college students’ computational thinking skills through flipped-classroom instruction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00196-0
Iwata, M., Pitkanen, K., Laru, J., & Makitalo, K. (2020). Exploring Potentials and Challenges to Develop Twenty-First Century Skills and Computational Thinking in K-12 Maker Education. Frontiers in Education, 5. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00087
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018).Pelan Inisiatif Pengukuhan Pendidikan STEM 2018-2019: Pemegang Inisiatif Utama, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (BPPDP).
Lavigne, H. J., Lewis-Presser, A., & Rosenfeld, D. (2020). An exploratory approach for investigating the integration of computational thinking and Mathematics for preschool children. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 63–77.
Menggist, W., Soromessa, T., & Feyisa, G. L. (2019). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX 7, 100777, doi:10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Kusnan, M. R., Tarmuji, N. H., and Omar, M. K. (2020). Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik: Aktiviti Pemikiran Komputasional dalam Pendidikan di Malaysia, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), pp. 112 - 122. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.581.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, Volume 339, b2535–b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535
Pugnali, A., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 16, 171.
Ridvan A., & Mustafa C. (2020). Understanding predictor effects of computational thinking skills and media and technology use and attitudes of pre-service teachers for STEM awareness.KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, June 2020, 17:1, 101-123.
Shamaki, T. A. (2015). Influence of learning environment on students' academic achievement in Mathematics: A case study of some selected secondary schools in Yobe State-Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 40–44.
Stewart, W. H., Baek, Y., Kwid, G., & Taylor, K. (2021). Exploring Factors That Influence Computational Thinking Skills in Elementary Students’ Collaborative Robotics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1208–1239.
Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021a). Improving 7th-graders’ computational thinking skills through unplugged programming activities: A study on the influence of multiple factors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100926. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100926
Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021b). Which way of design programming activities is more effective to promote K?12 students’ computational thinking skills? A meta?analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1048–1062. doi:10.1111/jcal.12545
Sun, L., Guo, Z., & Hu, L. (2021c). Educational games promote the development of students’ computational thinking: a meta-analytic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1931891
Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2020). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358. doi:10.1111/jcal.12493
Valovicova, L., Ondruska, J., Zelenicky, L., Chytry, V., & Medova, J. (2020). Enhancing Computational Thinking through Interdisciplinary STEAM Activities Using Tablets. Mathematics, 8(12), 2128. doi:10.3390/math8122128.
Xing, W. (2019). Large-scale path modeling of remixing to computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments. 29:3, 414-427.
Zhao, J. G. (2014). Combination of multiple databases is necessary for a valid systematic review. International Orthopaedics 38(12):2639-2639.
In-Text Citation: (Akil & Matore, 2023)
To Cite this Article: Akil, W. N. H. W. M., & Matore, M. E. @ E. M. (2023). Shocking Truths About Three Factors That Influenced Computational Thinking (I Wish I Learned Earlier!). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 1210–1224.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode