Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Designing Problem-Solving Module Based on Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: Nominal Group Technique Approach

Shivaraj Subramaniam, Siti Mistima Maat Maat, Muhammad Sofwan Mahmud Mahmud

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/17262

Open access

This article examines the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) as an alternative strategy for designing a module in problem-solving in mathematics education based on computational thinking for teachers. Researchers have used this strategy to address the issue of teaching methods for resolving issues in the area of measurement among teachers. The expert recommendations' summary results have determined 24 elements and three components that should be integrated into the module on solving problems teaching. Additionally, the study's results demonstrate how the NGT approach assisted researchers in obtaining element validation swiftly and effortlessly because the elements were created through literature reading, followed by discussion and expert consensus voting. It is recommended to conduct future research with specific model approach experts to solve problems with teaching methodologies

Abdullah, M. M., & Islam, R. (2011). Nominal Group Technique and its Applications in Managing Quality in Higher Education. Pak. J. Commer, Scocial Science, 5(1), 81–99.
Alfayez, A. A. (2018). Exploring the level of Conceptual Mastery in Computational Thinking Among Male Computer Science Teachers at Public Secondary School in Saudi Arabia [The University of Toledo].
https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=toledo1538656498846648&disposition=inline
Benakli, N., Kostadinov, B., Satyanarayana, A., & Singh, S. (2017). Introducing computational thinking through hands-on projects using R with applications to calculus, probability and data analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 393–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1254296
Bradshaw, Z., & Hazell, A. (2017). Developing problem-solving skills in mathematics: a lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2016-0032
Carney, O., McIntosh, J., & Worth, A. (1996). The use of the nominal group technique in research with community nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(5), 1024–1029.
Chalmers, C. (2018). Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 93–100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.005
Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2015). Computational Thinking: A Guide for Teachers. In Computing At School (Issue October 2018).
Deslandes, S. F., Mendes Figueira, C. H., De Oliveira Pires, T., & De Souza Campos, D. (2010). Use of the Nominal Group Technique and the Delphi Method to draw up evaluation indicators for strategies to deal with violence against children and adolescents in Brazil Uso da Técnica Grupo Nominal e do Método Delphi para a elaboração de indicadores de a. Rev. Bras. Saúde Matern. Infant, 10, 29–37.
Dobbie, A., Rhodes, M., Tysinger, J. W., & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. Family Medicine, 36(6), 402–406.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 355–369.
Ebiendele Ebosele Peter. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmcsr11.161
Firmansyah, M. A., & Syarifah, L. L. (2023). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in View of Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 58–66. https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/prima/article/view/7217/3821
Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113
Harvey, N., & Holmes, C. A. (2012). Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18(2), 188–194.
Horton, J. N. (1980). Nominal group technique: A method of decision?making by committee. Anaesthesia, 35(8), 811–814.
Imberman, S. P., Sturm, D., & Azhar, M. Q. (2014). Computational thinking: Expanding the toolkit. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 29(6), 39–46.
Marquez, R. A. S. (2022). Mathematics Engagement Clinic Grounded on Brain Dominance: Its Effect on Critical and Problem-Solving Skills, and Mathematics Achievement. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v7i1.136
Nachiappan, S., Osman, R., Masnan, A. H., Mustafa, M. C., Hussein, H., & Suffian, S. (2019). The Development Of Preschools' Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) Teaching Model towards Improving the Quality of Teaching. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i2/5601
National Research Council. (2011). Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. In Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/13170
O'Neil, M. J., & Jackson, L. (1983). Nominal Group Technique: A process for initiating curriculum development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078312331378994
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstrorms?:Children, Computer and Powerfull Ideas (V. Torre (ed.)). Basic Books, Inc. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Papert%2C+S.+%281980%29.+Computers+for+children.+Mindstorms%3A+Children%2C+computers%2C+and+powerful+ideas+%28pp.+3–18%29.&btnG=
Perry, J., & Linsley, S. (2006). The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in the teaching and summative assessment of the inter-personal skills of student mental health nurses. Nurse Education Today, 26(4), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.004
Saputra, M. D., Joyoatmojo, S., Wardani, D. K., & Sangka, K. B. (2019). Developing critical-thinking skills through the collaboration of Jigsaw model with problem-based learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12169a
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122
Van De, A., & Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 203–212.
Varga-Atkins, T., McIsaac, J., & Willis, I. (2017). Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: an effective combination for student evaluation? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058721
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking CS @ CMU and Grand Vision for the Field. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

In-Text Citation: (Subramaniam et al., 2023)
To Cite this Article: Subramaniam, S., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Designing Problem-Solving Module Based on Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: Nominal Group Technique Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 1381–1396.