Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Higher Education Students’ Engagement and Factors That Constrain Students’ Activeness in Learning Arabic Language

Nur Afiqah Athirah Mohd Rushdi, Lily Hanefarezan Asbulah

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/17265

Open access

Engagement is one of the keys to improve language acquisition. This study is conducted to measure the level of students’ engagement in the Arabic language. This study focuses on engagement which refers to the activity of students in engaging with the Arabic language inside and outside classroom in the context of activities and social. This study also aims to identify the factors that influence students’ activity in engaging with the Arabic language. A combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods through questionnaires and interviews is employed in this research. For quantitative data, questionnaires were distributed to 30 final year students majoring in Islamic studies at a public university while to obtain qualitative data, a total of five graduates of the Bachelor's Degree in Arabic were selected for the interview. IBM SPSS software version 27.0 was used to analyze the questionnaires and Atlas.ti software version 9.1.3 was used to analyze the interview transcripts. The findings of the study showed that the level of engagement of students towards the Arabic language is at a low level for the productive aspect compared to the receptive. The results of the interviews also showed that the majority of respondents admitted that it is difficult to engage in Arabic in productive aspects especially speaking skills. The two main factors that constrain students' engagement in Arabic are internal factors as well as environmental factors. This study proves that there is a critical need for certain parties to overcome the problems faced by students in their engagement in Arabic language.

Mohamad, A. H. (2009). Tahap Komunikasi dalam Bahasa Arab dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sarjana Muda Bahasa Arab di IPTA Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 1(1), 1–14.
Mustafa, A. F. F., & Mohamad, A. H. (2014). Tahap Penguasaan Bahasa Arab: Kajian Melalui Ujian Penempatan Bahasa Arab (APT). WCIT 2014 2nd World Conference on Islamic Thought & Civilization, 854–863.
Noor, A. F. M., Jasmi, K. A., & Shukor, K. A. (2016). Pembinaan Hubungan di antara Guru dengan Pelajar. Technical and Social Science Journal (TSSJ), 5(1), 138–148.
Al-Barashdi, H., Bouazza, A., & Jabur, N. (2015). Smartphone Addiction among University Undergraduates: A Literature Review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 4(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2015/12245
Allwright, R. L. (1984). The Importance of Interaction in Classroom Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156–171.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 69.
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At The Interface: Dynamic Interaction of Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X
Khalid, F., Daud, M. Y., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2016). Perbandingan penggunaan telefon pintar untuk tujuan umum dan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar universiti. International Conference on Education and Regional Development 2016 (ICERD 2016).
Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Yusri, G., Rahimi, N. M., & Parilah, M. S. (2010). Sikap pelajar terhadap pembelajaran kemahiran lisan Bahasa Arab di Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10(3), 15–33.
Fernandez, G. B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. National Association of Secondary School Principles.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge Language Teaching Library.
Daud, N., & Abdul Pisal, N. (2014). Permasalahan Pertuturan Dalam Bahasa Arab Sebagai Bahasa Kedua. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(1), 117–133.
Nguyen, V. A. (2017). The Impact of Online Learning Activities on Student Learning Outcome in Blended Learning Course. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964921750040X
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Samah, R. (2011). Isu pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab 2012 (PKEBAR’12).
Rost, M. (2001). Teaching and researching listening. In The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 7–13). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.002
Stroud, R. (2014). Student engagement in learning vocabulary with CALL. 340–344. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2014.000242
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Student’s Relationship With Teachers As Motivational Contextin . In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation (pp. 301–322). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Ismail, Z. (2001). Hubungan antara persekitaran bahasa Arab dengan kemahiran bertutur dalam bahasa Arab di kalangan pelajar universiti di Malaysia.

In-Text Citation: (Rushdi & Asbulah, 2023)
To Cite this Article: Rushdi, N. A. A. M., & Asbulah, L. H. (2023). Higher Education Students’ Engagement and Factors That Constrain Students’ Activeness in Learning Arabic Language. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 1739–1752.