ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
In the 21st century, computational thinking is an important skill in many fields, including mathematics education. However, previous studies discussing computational thinking activities among mathematics teachers are still limited. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted to examine the trends in previous studies on computational thinking and computational thinking activities among mathematics teachers. Two databases, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) were used to search for articles published from 2019 to 2023. A total of 633 articles using the keywords "computational thinking" and "mathematics teachers" were found, but only 14 articles met the criteria and were included in this study. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a systematic approach. Over the past five years, computational thinking activities among mathematics teachers have been studied in eight countries. The research trend is increasing, with most studies involving sample sizes of 1 to 20 teachers. Programming and robotics are the most implemented computational thinking activities among mathematics teachers. Mathematics teachers will benefit from this literature review as it will provide them with a better understanding of computational thinking activities in mathematics education. To enhance mathematics education, further research in this area is hoped to be conducted.
Avc?, C., & Deniz, M. N. (2022). Computational Thinking: Early Childhood Teachers’ and Prospective Teachers’ Preconceptions and Self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11689–11713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11078-5
Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918910.pdf
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Durán Sánchez, A., Álvarez-García, J., Río-Rama, D., & Cruz, M. (2014). Active Tourism Research: A Literature Review. ROTUR, 8, 62–76.
Erdo?an, F. (2020). The Relationship between Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills and Reflective Thinking Skills. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1
Filzah Zahilah, M. Z., Su, L. W., & Mohd Ridzwan, Y. (2019). A Review of Common Features Incomputational Thinking Frameworks in K-12 education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 551(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/551/1/012063
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 5TH Edition. Los Angeles: Sage publications
Humble N and Mozelius P (2023) Grades 7–12 Teachers’ Perception Of Computational Thinking For Mathematics And Technology. Front. Educ Journal. 8:956618. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.95661
Kjällander, S., Mannila, L., Åkerfeldt, A., & Heintz, F. (2021). Elementary Students’ First Approach to Computational Thinking and Programming. Education Sciences, 11(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020080
Knie, L., Standl, B., & Schwarzer, S. (2022). First Experiences of Integrating Computational Thinking into a Blended Learning in?service Training Program for STEM teachers. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1423–1439. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22529
Lee, I., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2019). Computational Thinking Integration Patterns Along the Framework Defining Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09802-x
Li, Y., Xu, S., & Liu, J. (2021). Development and Validation of Computational Thinking Assessment of Chinese Elementary School Students. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211010240
Mamolo, A., Rodney, S., & Tepylo, D. (2022). Coding and Climate Change: Investigating Prospective Teachers’ Pathways of Attention. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 68, 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101014
Maraza-Quispe, B., Sotelo-Jump, A. M., Alejandro-Oviedo, O. M., Quispe-Flores, L. M., Cari Mogrovejo, L. H., Fernandez-Gambarini, W. C., & Cuadros-Paz L. E. (2021). Towards the Development of Computational Thinking and Mathematical Logic through Scratch. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12, 2. https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120242
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2020). The ABC of Systematic Literature Review: The Basic Methodological Guidance for Beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Molina-Ayuso, L., Adamuz-Povedano, N., Bracho-López, R., & Torralbo-Rodríguez, M. (2022). Introduction to Computational Thinking with Scratch for Teacher Training for Spanish Primary School Teachers in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(12), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120899
Nor, W., Wan, A., Ahmad, W., & Wan, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Learning Theory on Computational Thinking. Journal of Human Development and Communication, Volume 9 2020 11–22.
Olsson, J., & Granberg, C. (2022). Teacher-student Interaction Supporting Students’ Creative Mathematical Reasoning during Problem Solving using Scratch. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2022.2105567
Osman, Z., & Yusoff, N. (2020). Pola dan Potensi Penerbitan Berbahasa Melayu dalam indeks Scopus. PENDETA: Journal of Malay Language, Education and Literature, 11(2), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.37134/pendeta.vol11.2.7.2020
Otterborn, A., Schönborn, K. J., & Hultén, M. (2019). Investigating Preschool Educators’ Implementation of Computer Programming in Their Teaching Practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00976-y
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., McDonald, S., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. The BMJ, 372. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On Teaching Programming Fundamentals and Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics: A Didactic Experience with Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
Ramaila, Sam & Shilenge, Hlulani. (2023). Integration of Computational Thinking Activities in Grade 10 Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478). 12. 458-471. 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2372.
Reichert, J. T., Couto Barone, D. A., & Kist, M. (2020). Computational thinking in K-12: An Analysis with Mathematics Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7832
Rogers, S. (2020). A Literature Review for the Implementation of Computational Thinking for Ontario K-12 classrooms. Major Papers, 150.
Seckel, M. J., Vásquez, C., Samuel, M., & Breda, A. (2021). Errors of Programming and Ownership of the Robot Concept Made by Trainee Kindergarten Teachers during an Induction Training. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 2955–2975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10708-8
Sezer, H. B. & Namukasa, I. K. (2021). Real-world Problems through Computational Thinking Tools and Concepts: The case of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12- 2020-0085
Subramaniam, S., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: A systematic Review. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7494
Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing Computational Thinking?: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies Computers & Education Assessing Computational Thinking. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). Mapping Computational Thinking Through Programming in K-12 Education: A Conceptual Model based on A Systematic Literature Review. Computers and Education, 162, 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083
Umutlu, D. (2022). TPACK Leveraged: A Redesigned Online Educational Technology Course for STEM Preservice Teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4773
Wan, Y. C. & Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore. (2023). Pemikiran Komputasional Murid dalam Pendidikan Matematik Berdasarkan Tinjauan Literatur Bersistematik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(1), e002045. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2045
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zampieri, M. T., & Javaroni, S. L. (2020). A Dialogue Between Computational Thinking and Interdisciplinarity using Scratch Software. Unipluriversidad, 20(1), e2020105. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.unipluri.20.1.06
Zieffler, A., Justice, N., delMas, R., & Huberty, M. D. (2021). The Use of Algorithmic Models to Develop Secondary Teachers’ Understanding of the Statistical Modeling Process. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1900759
(Mohmad & Maat, 2023)
Mohmad, A. F., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Computational Thinking Activities Among Mathematics Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3).
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode