Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Needs Analysis: Developing an Innovative Instructional Module to Teach Osmosis and Diffusion Concepts

Nor Tutiaini Ab. Wahid, Othman Talib, Ibrahim AbdulRahaman I Alkhaldi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i3/19217

Open access

In education, learning and teaching activities play a vital role in presenting permanent and meaningful learning to Science students, including those studying Biology. The perception of Biology as a challenging subject stems from students' difficulty visualizing molecular processes and their lack of skills in solving higher-order thinking problems. Bridging this gap in Biology instruction becomes imperative to enhance students' understanding. Thus, the objective of this study is to perform a needs analysis in order to assess the necessity for developing an innovative instructional module to teach osmosis and diffusion concepts for the Form Four Biology curriculum. This study applied the Design and Development Research (DDR), using the ADDIE model (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate). A research question was formulated for this study; how crucial is the development of an innovative teaching and learning module in teaching osmosis and diffusion concepts, in the view of experts? To seek the answer, semi-structured interviews were conducted involving three field experts. The data acquired from the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, facilitated by the use of Atlas.ti software. The key findings revealed four major themes that emerged from the needs analysis: (1) The importance of learning osmosis and diffusion, (2) Problems in Biology teaching and learning, (3) Teaching strategies, and (4) Desired improvements. Based on these themes, it appears that an alternative teaching module is needed to simplify the process of teaching and learning the concepts of osmosis and diffusion for both students and teachers. This study’s implication can be observed in terms of practice in the school context, where it provides an alternative tool for teaching and learning Biology.

Aksoy, G. (2012). The Effects of Animation Technique on the 7th Grade Science and Technology Course. Creative Education, 03(03), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33048
Almomen, R. K., Kaufman, D., Alotaibi, H., & Al-rowais, N. A. (2016). Applying the ADDIE — Analysis , Design , Development , Implementation and Evaluation — Instructional Design Model to Continuing Professional Development for Primary Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 538–546. https://doi.org/. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2016.78059
Artun, H., & Co?tu, B. (2013). Effect of the 5E Model on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis: A Mixed Method Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9371-2
Bonney, K. M. (2015). Case Study Teaching Method Improves Student Performance and Perceptions of Learning Gains †. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage 2013.
Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205
Elliot, D., Wilson, D., & Boyle, S. (2014). Science learning via multimedia portal resources: The Scottish case. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12085
Fisher, K.M. (1985) A misconception in biology: amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2): 53–62.
Hasni, A., Roy, P., & Dumais, N. (2016). The teaching and learning of diffusion and osmosis: What can we learn from analysis of classroom practices? A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1242a
Hong, J. C., Lin, M. P., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Kuo, Y. C. (2015). Comparing animated and static modes in educational gameplay on user interest, performance and gameplay anxiety. Computers and Education, 88, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.018
Klausmeier, H. J., & Allen, P. S. (1978). Instructional Design. Cognitive Development of Children and Youth. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411355-8.50014-0
Kramer, E. M., & Myers, D. R. (2013). Osmosis is not driven by water dilution. Trends in Plant Science, 18(4), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.12.001
Li, X., Sun, X., & Cai, J. (2022). Integrating problem posing into the mathematics classroom: current advances a nd future directions of research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48, 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.co beha.2022.101213
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00027-0
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical Education, 44(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x
Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Science Education, 85(6), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1029
Oliver, J. S., Hodges, G. W., Moore, J. N., Cohen, A., Jang, Y., Brown, S. A., … Robertson, T. P. (2017). Supporting High School Student Accomplishment of Biology Content Using Interactive Computer-Based Curricular Case Studies. Research in Science Education, (May), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9675-6
Oztas, F. (2014). How do high school students know diffusion and osmosis?? High school students ’ difficulties in understanding diffusion & osmosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3679–3682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.822
Rothman, K. . (2014). Six Persistent Research Misconception. J Gen Intern Med, 29(1), 1060–1064.
Sousa, C. (2016). Problem-based learning on cell biology and ecophysiology using integrated laboratory and computational activities. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 3(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2016.3763
Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating High School Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Diffusion and Osmosis through Concept Mapping and Conceptual Change Text. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308340
Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., & Wetherwax, P. (2002). Workshop Biology: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Active Learning in an Introductory Biology Course. BioScience, 52(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0272:WBDTEO]2.0.CO;2
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Virginia Braun &, & Victoria Clarke. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Wolkow, T. D., Durrenberger, L. T., Maynard, M. A., Harrall, K. K., & Hines, L. M. (2014). A comprehensive faculty, staff, and student training program enhances student perceptions of a course-based research experience at a two-year institution. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0056
Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: Students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and Conceptual Status of a biotechnological method. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9126-

(Wahid et al., 2023)
Wahid, N. T. A., Talib, O., & Alkhaldi, I. A. I. (2023). Needs Analysis: Developing an Innovative Instructional Module to Teach Osmosis and Diffusion Concepts. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3), 1670-1683.