ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
This concept paper aims to (1) highlight teaching circles using smart board, (2) review the strengths of teaching using the smart board, and (3) highlight some previous studies in this field. The authors explain the importance of the study of circles, its close connection with other branches of mathematics, and the problems that students encounter when studying the topics of circle. The authors provide insights on teaching using the traditional method and teaching using the smart board. Based on the literature, the authors divided the essential paper into four sections: Teaching Using Traditional Method, Teaching Circles Using Traditional Method, Teaching Using Smart Board, and finally Teaching Circles Using Smart Board. Based on the literature, some strengths of Teaching Circles Using Smart Board are presented.It is emphasized that teachers should be aware of the strengths of Teaching Circles Using Smart Board. Research in this field must be expanded to find effective educational strategies that contribute to increasing the use of the smart board in other mathematical topics and in other subjects such as physics and chemistry.
Abdullah, A. H., Soh, H. M., Mokhtar, M., Hamzah, M. H., Ashari, Z. M., Ali, D. F., ... & Abd Rahman, S. N. S. (2020). Does the use of smart board increase students’ higher order thinking skills (HOTS)?. Ieee Access, 9, 1833-1854.
Abdullah, A. H., Soh, H. M., Mokhtar, M., Hamzah, M. H., Ashari, Z. M., Ali, D. F., ... & Abd Rahman, S. N. S. (2020). Does the use of smart board increase students’ higher order thinking skills (HOTS)?. Ieee Access, 9, 1833-1854.
Aksu, Z. (2019). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge Regarding Student Mistakes on the Subject of Circle. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 440-445.
Akyeampong, K., Lussier, K., Pryor, J., & Westbrook, J. (2013). Improving teaching and learning of basic maths and reading in Africa: Does teacher preparation count?. International journal of educational development, 33(3), 272-282.
Alaidi, A., Yahya, O., & Alrikabi, H. (2020). Using modern education technique in Wasit university.
Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. English language teaching, 12(5), 73-78.
Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers college record, 91(3), 409-421.
Asiri, A., Panday-Shukla, P., Rajeh, H. S., & Yu, Y. (2021). Broadening Perspectives on CALL Teacher Education: From Technocentrism to Integration. TESL-EJ, 24(4), n4.
Babaeer, S. (2014). An ethnographic case study of technology use in the elementary classroom (Doctoral dissertation).
Battey, D., Neal, R. A., Leyva, L., & Adams-Wiggins, K. (2016). The interconnectedness of relational and content dimensions of quality instruction: Supportive teacher–student relationships in urban elementary mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 1-19.
Bennet, D (1999). Exploring geometry with geometer’s sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry learning-A lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 77-86.
B?çak, F. (2019). Investigation of the views of teachers toward the use of smart boards in the teaching and learning process. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3(1), 15-23.
Birgin, O., & Topuz, F. (2021). Effect of the GeoGebra software-supported collaborative learning environment on seventh grade students’ geometry achievement, retention and attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 474-494.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1).
Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719-726.
Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Pincas, A., & Wilde, R. D. (2002). Teaching English as a foreign language. Routledge.
Cabus, S. J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). SMART in M athematics? Exploring the effects of in?class?level differentiation using SMART board on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 145-161.
Carstens, K. J., Mallon, J. M., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(1), 105-113.
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. Zdm, 52(7), 1291-1305.
Devkota, S. (2023). Effectiveness of Geogebra in Teaching Circle at Grade X: A Quasi-Experimental Study (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Management).
Dogan, M. (2010 ). The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles. Retrieved from: http://www.time2010.uma.es/Proceedings/Papers/A026_Paper.pdf
Dwijayani, N. M. (2019, October). Development of circle learning media to improve student learning outcomes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1321, No. 2, p. 022099). IOP Publishing.
Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-Using Teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5).
Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138-159.
Friedman, L. M. (2005). A history of American law. Simon and Schuster.
Fullan. M (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York, Teachers’ College Press.
Garcia-Olp, M., Nelson, C., & Saiz, L. (2019). Conceptualizing a mathematics curriculum: Indigenous knowledge has always been mathematics education. Educational Studies, 55(6), 689-706.
Geer, R., & Barnes, A. (2007). Cognitive Concomitants of Interactive Board Use and Their Relevance to Developing Effective Research Methodologies. International education journal, 8(2), 92-102.
Giorgdze, M., & Dgebuadze, M. (2017). Interactive teaching methods: challenges and perspectives. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 544-548.
Gonzalez Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational studies in mathematics, 15(2), 105-127.
Guido, R. M. D. (2018). Attitude and motivation towards learning physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02293.
Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63-69.
Hatfield, M. M., & Bitter, G. G. (1994). A multimedia approach to the professional development of teachers: A virtual classroom. NCTM, 102-115.
Hicks, S. D. 2011. Technology in today’s classroom: Are you a techsavvy teacher? The Clearing House 84: 188–91.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2023). Creating practical theories of teaching. In Theorizing teaching: Current status and open issues (pp. 23-56). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty?first century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54.
Hoslar, A. M., & Brahier, D. J. (2008). How" Smart" is the Interactive Whiteboard for Ohio Mathematics Teachers?.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The New Sourcebook for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Elementary School. A Longwood Professional Book. Allyn & Bacon, 111 Tenth St., Des Moines, IA 50309..
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The New Sourcebook for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Elementary School. A Longwood Professional Book. Allyn & Bacon, 111 Tenth St., Des Moines, IA 50309..
Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. Zdm, 51, 869-884.
Martin, D. B. (2019). Equity, inclusion, and antiblackness in mathematics education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 459-478.
Mazana, Y. M., Suero Montero, C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating students' attitude towards learning mathematics.
Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. Journal of research on technology in education, 42(3), 285-307.
Mihai, M. A. (2017). Success factors and challenges of an information communication technology network in rural schools. Africa Education Review, 14(1), 155-170.
Miranda, H. P., & Russell, M. (2012). Understanding factors associated with teacher?directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 652-666.
Molloy, E., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Noble, C., Rudland, J., & Ryan, A. (2020). Challenging feedback myths: values, learner involvement and promoting effects beyond the immediate task. Medical education, 54(1), 33-39.
Mun, S. H., & Abdullah, A. H. (2016, December). A review of the use of smart boards in education. In 2016 IEEE 8th international conference on engineering education (ICEED) (pp. 120-125). IEEE.
Mun, S. H., & Abdullah, A. H. (2016, December). A review of the use of smart boards in education. In 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 120-125). IEEE.?
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 1999.
Pacholczyk, J. (1996). Music and Astronomy in the Muslim World. Leonardo, 29(2), 145-150.
Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1177412 CrossRef.
Prahani, B., Jatmiko, B., Hariadi, B., Sunarto, D., Sagirani, T., Amelia, T., & Lemantara, J. (2020). Blended web mobile learning (BWML) model to improve students’ higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(11), 42-55.
Qizi, A. M. A., & Muydinjonovna, E. H. (2020). TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 8(6), 17.
Qizi, A. M. A., & Muydinjonovna, E. H. (2020). TECHNOLOGICAL METHODS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 8(6), 17.
Roberts, G. R. (2012). Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown.
Samuelsson, J. (2010). The impact of teaching approaches on students’ mathematical proficiency in Sweden. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 5(2), 61-78.
Sandybayev, A. (2020). The impact of e-learning technologies on student’s motivation: Student centered interaction in business education. International Journal of Research in Tourism and Hospitality (IJRTH), 6(1), 16-24.
Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568.
Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual-procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 19-43.
Singh, T. K. R., & Chan, S. (2014). Teacher readiness on ICT integration in teaching-learning: A Malaysian case study. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(7), 874-885.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and teacher education, 17(2), 213-226.
Szymkowiak, A., Melovi?, B., Dabi?, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565.
Tay, M. K., & Wonkyi, T. M. (2018). Effect of using Geogebra on senior high school students’ performance in circle theorems. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 14, 1-18.
Tunaboylu, C., & Demir, E. (2017). The Effect of Teaching Supported by Interactive Whiteboard on Students' Mathematical Achievements in Lower Secondary Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 81-94.
White, J. (2012). The impact of technology on student engagement and achievement in mathematics classroom. Paper submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Education, Memorial University, NL.
Wiseman, D. G., & Hunt, G. H. (2013). Best practice in motivation and management in the classroom. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Wiseman, D. G., & Hunt, G. H. (2013). Best practice in motivation and management in the classroom. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Wolk, R. A. (2011). Wasting minds: Why our education system is failing and what we can do about it. ASCD.
Wood, W. B., & Gentile, J. M. (2003). Teaching in a research context. Science, 302(5650), 1510-1510.
Yao, Y. (2021). The geometry of three-way decision. Applied Intelligence, 51(9), 6298-6325.
Yen, J. C., & Lee, C. Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138-145.
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
2025 © Copyright HRMARS. All rights Reserved.