The Effect of STEM-based 5E Module (in the topic of Waves) in Enhancing Scientific Literacy Among Ninth-grade Students in Doha, Qatar

Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5–6), 23–37. https://search.ebscohost.com.eres.qnl.qa/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ943196&lang=ar&site=eds-live&scope=site
Bishop, A. E. (2015). Career Aspirations of High School Males and Females in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program. University of Maryland.
Boyster, J. (2018). The Effect of Mastery Learning and STEM Instruction on Student Achievement [Missouri Baptist University]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2025985917?accountid=8144%0Ahttp://sfx.aub.aau.dk/sfxaub?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&atitle=&title=T
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Heinemann Publications.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. National Science Teachers Association. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qnllib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1416112
Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E Instructional Model to Introduce STEM Disciplines. Science and Children, 056(06), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_056_06_8
Bybee, R, Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. In Bscs (Issue January). papers://dee23da0-e34b-4588-b624-f878b46d7b3d/Paper/p424
Bybee, Rodger. (2009). THE BSCS 5E INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS. In WORKSHOP ON EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF 21ST CENTURY SKILLS. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_056_06_8
Bybee, Rodger. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model?: creating teachable moments. NSTA press.
Bybee, Rodger, McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20333
Campell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/48969/1/76.pdf
Chitman-Brooker, L., & Kopp, K. (2013). The 5Es of Inquiry-Based SCiENCE. Shell Education.
Costa, A. M., Ferreira, M. E., & da Silva Loureiro, M. J. (2021). Scientific literacy: The conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. Revista Colombiana de Educacion, 1(81), 195–228.
https://doi.org/10.17227/RCE.NUM81-10293
Dass, P. M. (2015). Teaching STEM Effectively with the Learning Cycle Approach. K-12 STEM Education, 1(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3832-5
Dewey, J. (1938). EXPERIENCE AND EDUCATION. Collier Books.
Freeman, B. (2013). Science , Mathematics , Engineering and Technology ( STEM) in Australia?: Practice , policy and programs. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (2019). An international view of STEM education. In A. Sahin & M. J. Mohr-Schroeder (Eds.), STEM Education 2.0 (Issue November). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400
Harland, D. J. (2011). STEM Student Research Handbook. NSTA press.
Harlen, W. (2001). The Assessment of Scientific Literacy in the OECD/PISA Project. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (pp. 49–60). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8
Holbrook, J. (2010). Education through science as a motivational innovation for science education for all. Science Education International, 21(2), 80–91. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ890663
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Ihejiamaizu, C. C., Ukor, D. D., & Neji, H. A. (2018). Utilization of 5Es’ constructivist approach for enhancing the teaching of difficult concepts in biology. Global Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v17i1.8
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). It’s Debatable?! Using Socioscientific Issues to Develop Scientific Literacy , K-12. NSTA press.
Kaniawati, D. S., Kaniawati, I., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Implementation of STEM Education in Learning Cycle 5E to Improve Concept Understanding On Direct Current Concept. 1st International Conference of Mathematics and Science Education (ICMSEd 2016), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.6
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. In International Journal of STEM Education (Vol. 3, Issue 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Kurt, S. (2018, December 16). ADDIE Model: Instructional Design. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/
Liu, X. (2013). Expanding Notions of Scientific Literacy: A Reconceptualization of Aims of Science Education in the Knowledge Society. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice. http://www.springer.com/series/8286
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. https://www.stem.org.uk/system/files/elibrary-resources/legacy_files_migrated/21200-Beyond 2000 science education for the future.pdf
Morgan, J. R., M., M. A., & Barroso, L. R. (2013). ENGINEERING BETTER PROJECTS. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-Based Learning (pp. 29–39). SENSE PUBLISHERS.
Murphy, S., MacDonald, A., & Danaia, L. (2020). Sustaining STEM: A Framework for Effective STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum. In A. MacDonald, L. Danaia, & S. Murphy (Eds.), STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum: Early Childhood to Senior Secondary (pp. 9–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2015.12.010%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0546-9%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2014.12.021%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02670-6%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00286-5%0Ahttps://onlinelibrar
National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. The national academies press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
National Research Council. (2011a). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs in K-12 STEM Education; National Research Council. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9764
National Research Council. (2011b). Successful STEM Education: A Workshop Summary. In Successful STEM Education. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13230
National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2018). 5E Instructional Model. https://www.nsta.org/about/positions/5e.aspx
Noraini Idris, Mohd Fadzil Daud, Chew Cheng Meng, Leong Kwan Eu, & Ahmad Dzohir Ariffin. (2013). Securing Australia ’ s Future STEM?: Country Comparisons. 1–45.
OECD. (2017). How does PISA for Development measure scientific literacy? In PISA for Development Brief. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
Ong, E. T., Luo, X., Yuan, J., & Yingprayoon, J. (2020). The Effectiveness of a Professional Development Program on the use of STEM-based 5E Inquiry Learning Model for Science Teachers in China. Science Education International, 31(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.7
Orak, S. D., & Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2021). In between 21st century skills and constructivism in elt: Designing a model derived from a narrative literature review. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n2p166
Osborne, J. (2007). Science Education for the Twenty First Century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184.
Phaprom, P., Nachanthong, J., Nachanthong, A., & Srihata, S. (2019). Promoting problem solving and thinking competencies for the middle school students using STEM activities in the Moderate Class, More Knowledge project. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012011
Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social developing tools for an effective classrooom. Education, 130(2), 241–250. http://content.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=47349084&S=R&D=ehh&EbscoContent=dGJyMNXb4kSeqa84zdnyOLCmr0qep7VSrqm4S66WxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGss0q1qK5IuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA%5Cnhttp://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http:
Qureshi, S., Bradley, K., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Treagust, D., Southam, D., Mocerino, M., & Ojeil, J. (2016). Educational Reforms and Implementation of Student-Centered Active Learning in Science at Secondary and University Levels in Qatar. Science Education International, 27(3), 437–456.
Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2017). Making STEM Curriculum Useful, Relevant, and Motivating for Students. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM Education in the Junior Secondary: The State of Play (pp. 91–109). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8
Richardson, S. S. (2016). The Effect of an Integrated STEM Course on Middle School Students ’ Interest and Career Aspirations in STEM Fields. University of Kansas.
Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E Learning Cycle. The Science Teacher, 086(05). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_086_05_48
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: a detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science Education as/for Participation in the Community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
Said, Z., Al-Emadi, A. A., Friesen, H. L., & Adam, E. (2018). Assessing the science interest, attitude, and self-efficacy of Qatari students at the preparatory, secondary, and university levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94733
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Sugiarti, A. C., Suyatno, S., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2018). The development of learning material using learning cycle 5E model based stem to improve students’ learning outcomes in Thermochemistry. International Conference on Science Education (ICoSEd), 1006(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012039
Texley, J., & Ruud, R. M. (2018). Teaching STEM literacy: a constructivist approach for ages 3 to 8. In Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. Redleaf Press. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/245180/245180.pdf%0Ahttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/245180%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.003%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.08.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.12
Treagust, D. F., Qureshi, S. S., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Ojeil, J., Mocerino, M., & Southam, D. C. (2020). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: a Perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry Classes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0
Tupsai, J., Bunprom, S., Saysang, J., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Students’ Applying STEM Knowledge in Learning on the STS-STEM Education Wave Learning Unit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), 0–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012054
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf
United Nations general assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. http://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard university press.

(Alwaqfi & Saleh, 2023)
Alwaqfi, E. J. A., & Saleh, S. (2023). The Effect of STEM-based 5E Module (in the topic of Waves) in Enhancing Scientific Literacy Among Ninth-grade Students in Doha, Qatar. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(4), 823–837.

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode