ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The annulment of the decision is the last stage after the approval of the Shariah Court is announced. An appeal allows a different judge to review a case and overturn an earlier decision to make the right decision. Nevertheless, there are some issues that arise and need to be seen such as the extent to which Islamic law and Fuqaha can be used to support the cancellation of this decision. In fact, this study tries to discuss the concept of canceling a decision according to the views of Fuqaha in Islamic law and regulations. This investigation uses a documentary descriptive analysis method. This study concludes that the annulment of a decision has a principle in shariah law and the Jurists agree that the annulment of a decision is an important part of the review process to correct a wrong decision. The study also found that shariah courts were guided by legal standards that gave reasons to overturn cases in the past. In fact, this study is useful as a reference for shariah law practitioners who control audit cases in the context of overturning decisions in the shariah courts in Malaysia.
Bukhari, A. A. (2009). Kushif al-Asrar an 'usul fakhar al-Islam al-bazdawii. Beirut: Dar al-kutub al-Alamiyyah.
Al-Asqalani, S. A. D. (1997). Fath al-Bari bi Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Al-Bukhari, A. J. (1989). Sahih al-Bukhari. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Tarabulsi, A. B. (n.d.). Mu‘ayyan al-Hukkam fima Yataradad bayn al-Khasamayn min al-Ahkam. Bayrut: Dar Fikr.
Muhammad, A. B. (n.d.). (1984). Rawdah al-Qada wa Tariq al-Naja, ‘Amman: Dar al-Furqan.
Al-Mardawy, A. B. (1980). al-Insaf fi Ma’rifat al-Rajih min al-Khilaf. Beirut: Dar al-Turath al-Arabi
Al-Mawardi, A. A.-H.-B. (1994). al-Hawi al-Kabir. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Qurtubi, A. W. (1981). Bidayah al-Mujtahid wa al-Nihayah al-Muqtasid. Qahirah: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.
Al-Sarakhsi, A. B.-D. (2000. ). al-Mabsut. Bayrut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.
Al-Sharbini, S. A. D.-K. (1958). Mughni al-Muhtaj. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr li al-Taba‘ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi‘.
Al-Sindi, A. H.-H. (1997). Sharh Sunan Ibn Majah. Bayrut: Dar al-Makrifah.
Amanah Raya Berhad v Awg Damit Awang Tengah & Ors [2008] 1 MSLR 175
Santoasa, F. (2015). Penerapan Konsep Batal Demi Hukum di Peradilan Pidana, Perdata dan Tata Usaha Negara. Maksigama Jurnal Hukum. Tahun 18 No 1, hlm 60-70.
Harahap, H. (2012). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ibn Abidin, M. A. (1979). Hashiyat Ibn Abidin. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, A. ‘.-D. (1996). I‘lam al-Muwaqqi‘in ‘an Rabb al-‘Alamin. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Alamiyyah.
Ibn Farqun, I. I. (1996). Tabsirat al-Hukkam fi Usul al-Aqdiyyah wa Manahij al-Ahkam. Qahirah: Maktabat al-Kulliyyat al-Azhariyyah.
Ibn Kathir, A. F.-Q.-D. (1988). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Qahirah: Dar al-Rayyan li al-Turath.
Ibn Qudamah, A. M.-M. (1981). al-Mughni. Riyad: Maktabah al-Riyad al-Hadithah.
Kuwait, K. W. (1983). Ensklopedia Fiqh Kuwait. Jilid ke 3. Kuwait: Dar al-Salasil.
Yasin, M. N.-S. (2000). Nazariyah ad-Dakwa bayna al-Syariyyah al-Islamiyyah wa Qanun al-Murafa‘at al-Madaniya, Jordan: Dar al-Nafayis.
Al-Ghamidi, N. B. (1418H). al-Ikhtisasu al-Qadayiyu fi al-fiqh al-Islami. Riyad: Maktabah al-Rashid.
Al-Omran, N. M. (2015) “Historical and Political Background of Judicial Review in The Islamic Legal System,” American Research Journal of History and Culture, vol. 1, no. 1. hlm 1-11.
Al-Qarafi, S. A.-D. (1967). al-Ihkam fi Tamyiz al-Fatawa ‘an al-Ahkam wa Tassarrufat al-Qadi wa’l-Imam. Syria: Maktaba al-Matba’at al-Islamiyyah.
Al-Azhari, S. B.-A. (1204H). . Hashiyah al-Jamal ala Sharh al-Minhaj. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr.
Hingun, W. A. (1995). An Introduction to Administrative Law. Singapura: FT Law & Tax Asia Pasific.
(Moideen et al., 2024)
Moideen, S. H. Bin, Muhamad, N. H. N., Sulieman, S. A. B., Rahim, N. S. B., & Ag, M. Y. S. (2024). Annulment in Islamic Judiciary Decisions According to Fuqaha and Law. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 1147–1162.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode