Innovative Augmented Reality Integration for Enhanced Geometry Education: A Review of the Impact on Student Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement

Abdul Hanid, M. F., Mohamad Said, M. N. H., Yahaya, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Effects of augmented reality application integration with computational thinking in geometry topics. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 27, Issue 7). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10994-w
Ahmad, N. I. N., & Junaini, S. N. (2020). Augmented Reality for Learning Mathematics: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 106–
122. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14961
Arvanitaki, M., & Zaranis, N. (2020). The use of ICT in teaching geometry in primary school.
Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5003–5016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 020-10210-7
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. 6, 1–60.
Bhagat, K. K., Yang, F. Y., Cheng, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Liou, W. K. (2021). Tracking the process and motivation of math learning with augmented reality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3153–3178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10066-9
Bindak, R. (2004). Geometri tutum ölçe÷i güvenirlik çalÕúmasÕ ve bir uygulama. Dicle University.
Chien, Y. C., Su, Y. N., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2019). Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4
Cuevas, J. V., & Paymalan, I. B. (2021). Software-Based Circle Technology in Dinagat Geometry Class: A Single Subject Research. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 5(2),
125. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v5i2.20055
Elsayed, S. A., & Al-Najrani, H. I. (2021). Effectiveness of the Augmented Reality on Improving the Visual Thinking in Mathematics and Academic Motivation for Middle School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11069
Ertem Akbas, E., & Alan, K. (2022). Examining 6th Grade Students’ Learning of the Subject of
Volume with GeoGebra Software Within the Framework of RME Approach. Open Journal for Educational Research, 6(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0601.07089e
Fabian, K., & Topping, K. J. (2019). Putting “mobile” into mathematics: Results of a randomised controlled trial. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101783
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3
Fadil, M. S. I. A., & Wahid, N. (2021). Pembangunan Aplikasi m-Pembelajaran Secara Realiti Maya untuk Sains Tahun 4. Applied Information Technology And ComputerScience, 2(2), 650–667.
Fryer, L. K., Shum, A., Lee, A., & Lau, P. (2021). Mapping students ’ interest in a new domain: Connecting prior knowledge , interest , and self-efficacy with interesting tasks and a lasting desire to reengage. Learning and Instruction, 75(May), 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101493
Galton, M., & Morrison, I. (2000). Concluding comments. Transfer and transition: The next steps.
International Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 0355(00)00027-6
Gargrish, S. (2021). Measuring effectiveness of augmented reality ? based geometry learning assistant on memory retention abilities of the students in 3D geometry. November 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424
Godoy Jr., C. H. (2020). Augmented Reality for Education: A Review. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(6), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20jun256
Hidi, S., & Ann Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Hwa, S. P. (2018). Pedagogical change in mathematics learning: Harnessing the power of digital game-based learning. Educational Technology and Society, 21(4), 259–276.
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 123(November 2017), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
?bili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., ?ahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382
Jabar, J. M., Hidayat, R., Samat, N. A., Rohizan, M. F. H., Rosdin, N. ‘Ain, Salim, N., & Norazhar, S. A. (2022). Augmented Reality Learning in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(15), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i15.5570
Jesionkowska, J., & Wild, F. (2020). education sciences Active Learning Augmented Reality for STEAM Education — A Case Study. 1–15.
Jindal-Snape, D., & Foggie, J. (2008). A holistic approach to primary - Secondary transitions.
Improving Schools, 11(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207086750
Jindal-Snape, D., & Miller, D. J. (2008). A challenge of living? Understanding the psycho-social processes of the child during primary-secondary transition through resilience and self-esteem theories. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 008-9074-7
Kamid, K., Rohati, R., Hobri, H., Triani, E., Rohana, S., & Pratama, W. A. (2022). Process Skill and Student’s Interest for Mathematics Learning: Playing a Traditional Games. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15352a
Kidd, S. H., & Crompton, H. (2016). Augmented learning with augmented reality. In Mobile Learning Design (pp. 97–108). Springer.
Kinnari-korpela, H. (2019). Enhancing Learning in Engineering Mathematics Education. Tampere University.
Kosovich, J. J., Flake, J. K., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Short-term motivation trajectories: a parallel process model of expectancy-value. Contemp. Educ. Psychol, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.004
Lainufar, Mailizar, & Johar, R. (2020). A need analysis for the development of augmented reality based-geometry teaching instruments in junior high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012034
Liarokapis, F., Petridis, P., Andrews, D., & Freitas, S. De. (2017). Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. In Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage (pp. 371–392).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49607-8
Lima, C. B. De, Walton, S., & Owen, T. (2022). A critical outlook at augmented reality and its adoption in education. Computers and Education Open, 3(January), 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100103
Lin, P. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). Design and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Recommendation Based Augmented Reality System for Teaching Programming and Computational Thinking. IEEE Access, 8, 45689–45699. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977679
Mamiala, D., Mji, A., & Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2021). Students’ Interest in Understanding Geometry in South African High Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090308
Mariyana. (2020). IMTECH : Journal of Instructional , Media Education and Technology Implementation of TPS Cooperative Learning Model for Improving Student Motivation Using Augmented Reality IMTECH : Journal of Instructional , Media Education and Technology.
Journal of Instructional, Media Education and Technology, 1(1), 1–7.
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020).
Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120595
Nazar, M., Aisyi, R., Rahmayani, R. F. I., Hanum, L., Rusman, R., Puspita, K., & Hidayat, M. (2020).
Development of Augmented Reality application for learning the concept of molecular geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1460/1/012083
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865
Nugraha, D. M. D. P. (2020). Integrasi Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Penerapan Blended Learning Di Sekolah Dasar. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 472–484. http://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/cetta
Nuutila, K., Tapola, A., Tuominen, H., Kupiainen, S., Pásztor, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2020). Reciprocal Predictions Between Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Performance During a Task. Frontiers in Education, 5(April). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00036
Nzaramyimana, E. (2021). Effectiveness of GeoGebra towards Students’ Active Learning, Performance and Interest to Learn Mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics and Computer Research, 09(10). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmcr/v9i10.05
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743
Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
Palanc?, A., & Turan, Z. (2021). How Does the Use of the Augmented Reality Technology in Mathematics Education Affect Learning Processes?: A Systematic Review. Uluslararas? E?itim Programlar? ve Ö?retim Çal??malar? Dergisi, 11(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2021.005
Patrick, L., Care, E., & Ainley, M. (2011). The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710382615
Raedts, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van Waes, L., & Daems, F. (2007). Observational learning through video-based models: Impact on students’ accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs, task knowledge and writing performances. In Studies in Writing (Vol. 19, Issue November 2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/s1572-6304(2006)0000019014
Rauschnabel, P. A. (2021). Augmented reality is eating the real-world! The substitution of physical products by holograms. International Journal of Information Management, 57(November 2020), 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102279
Riconscente, M. M. (2014). Effects of Perceived Teacher Practices on Latino High School Students Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Achievement in Mathematics. Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813358
Sarkar, P., Kadam, K., & Pillai, J. S. (2020). Learners’ approaches, motivation and patterns of problem-solving on lines and angles in geometry using augmented reality. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00124-9
Saundarajan, K., Osman, S., Daud, M. F., Abu, M. S., Pairan, M. R., & Kumar, J. A. (2020). Learning algebra using augmented reality. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.10540
Sides, J. D., & Cuevas, J. A. (2020). Effect of goal setting for motivation, self-efficacy, and performance in elementary mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1341a
Sudihartinih, E., & Wahyudin. (2019). Analysis of students’ self efficacy reviewed by geometric
thinking levels and gender using rasch model. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(1), 509–519.
Tan, T. H. (2016). Effects of van Hiele’s Phases of Learning and Theory of Geometry Thinking on Geometry Learning of Malaysian Year Five Students. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., & Hall, C. (2015). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4
Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., & Tusiime, M. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Attitudes in Learning 3-Dimension Geometry using GeoGebra. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.17
Vandewaetere, M., Desmet, P., & Clarebout, G. (2011). The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.038
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Computers & Education Evaluation of learners ’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. 68, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
Wong, S. L., & Wong, S. L. (2021). Effects of motivational adaptive instruction on student motivation towards mathematics in a technology-enhanced learning classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11199
Yang, T. C., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, S. J. H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology and Society, 16(4), 185–200.
Yaniawati, P. (2022). The Potential of Mobile Augmented Reality As A Didactic And Pedagogical Source In Learning Geometry 3D. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 4–22.
Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9
Yousef, A. M. F. (2021). Augmented reality assisted learning achievement, motivation, and creativity for children of low-grade in primary school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 966– 977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12536

(Adnan & Osman, 2024)
Adnan, N. A. S., & Osman, S. (2024). Innovative Augmented Reality Integration for Enhanced Geometry Education: A Review of the Impact on Student Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement. International Journal of Acdemic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 1537–1554.

Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode