Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

English Teaching Management in Public High Schools: A Study Based on Dissipative Structure Theory under the Integration of Sustainable Development Goals in China

Yiran Wei, Nor Asniza Binti Ishak

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i2/21149

Open access

Dissipative structure theory provides essential insights for improving classroom teaching management, but empirical research on high school English is lacking. This study aims to investigate high school English teachers’ perception of dissipative structure theory (including attitudes, acceptance and application level, and alignment of teaching management beliefs) and determine whether age differences exist. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used to analyze questionnaire data. The study findings indicate that users have low acceptance and application levels (mean=3.56), with the highest mean value found for attitudes (3.73) and the lowest mean value for implementing intention (mean=3.42). A significant difference was found between acceptance and application levels and implementing cooperative teaching and teacher-student workshops. Meanwhile, perceptions of classroom management tasks also differ significantly based on the age of high school English teachers. Three points are proposed to encourage high school English teachers to use dissipative structure theory for classroom management.

An, W. (1990). Educational Science and Systems Science. Changchun: Jilin Education Press.
Cai, T. (2022). The Self-organizing Theory Basis of Postmodern Curriculum Outlook and Innovative Thinking. Global Education Prospects, 2022, 31(06), 42-47.
Chen, N. (2022). Analysis of characteristics and strategies of mixed learning based on dissipative structure theory. Chinese Journal of Electric Education, 2022(11), 13-17.
Han, N. (2014). Research on classroom teaching management in high school English. [Dissertation, Ludong University].
Li, R. (1984). Non-equilibrium Nonlinear Phenomena and Fluctuating Chemistry - A New Topic in Physical Chemistry. Chemical Bulletin, 1984(05), 41-47.
Osler, S., & Star, N. (1994). Educational Psychology - A Cognitive Perspective. Beijing: People's Education Press.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1987). From Chaos to Order. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Press.
Ruan, X. (2019). Critique, Diagnosis, and Knowledge Reconstruction. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Wang, X. (2018). Dissipative structure theory and postmodern curriculum paradigm. Global Education Perspective, 31(07), 61-65.
Xu?P. (2016).Analysis and thinking on questionnaire survey of blended English teaching based on SPOC-Taking Changzhou Information Vocational and Technical College as an example,15(5)?56-59.
Ye, L. (2019). An Exploration of Educational Research Methodology. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
Yu, Q. (2015). On the Contextual Generation of Educational Research Methodology. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 33(01), 25-30.
Yue, X. (2015). An Initial Exploration of Self-Organized Ubiquitous English Learning. English Square, 2015(10), 67-68.
Zhang, F. (2023). Dissipative Structure in Enterprise Management. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Information & Management Engineering Edition), 2023(04), 160-163.
Zhang, W., & Guo, B. (2017). Resolving defence mechanisms: A perspective based on dissipative structure theory. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(2).
Zhu, Y. (2017). Teaching management strategies for effective student learning in English classrooms. Academic Weekly, 32, 39-40.
Zhu, S. (2022). Analysis of the openness of educational technology based on dissipative structure theory. Educational Research on Distance Education, 2022(03), 27-29.

(Wei & Ishak, 2024)
Wei, Y., & Ishak, N. A. B. (2024). English Teaching Management in Public High Schools: A Study Based on Dissipative Structure Theory under the Integration of Sustainable Development Goals in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 217–225.