ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Formative Assessment strategies in chemistry classrooms are important for enhancing learning, identifying misconceptions, improving student engagement, promoting metacognition, and supporting differentiation in the classroom. This research utilizes a systematic literature review (SLR) method to examine formative assessment strategies in the chemistry classroom in secondary schools. The review process follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty articles were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), focusing on empirical studies published between 2019 and 2023. The article selection process utilized two databases: Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The major findings identified four key themes related to formative assessment in the chemistry classroom; the teaching and learning approaches, assessment tools, technology and professional development within the secondary school setting. Further study recommendations include exploring diverse formative assessment methods and integrating innovative assessment tools with technology to enhance self-assessment and improve student outcomes.
Abell, T. N., & Sevian, H. (2020). Analyzing Chemistry Teachers’ Formative Assessment Practices Using Formative Assessment Portfolio Chapters. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4255–4267. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00361
Abell, T. N., & Sevian, H. (2021). Investigating How Teachers’ Formative Assessment Practices Change across a Year. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2799–2808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00356
Babin?áková, M., Ganajová, M., & Bernard, P. (2023). Introduction of Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) to School Chemistry Teaching: Teachers’ Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(9), 3276–3290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00591
Babin?áková, M., Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., & Bernard, P. (2020). Influence of formative assessment classroom techniques (Facts) on student’s outcomes in chemistry at secondary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.36
Bernal-Ballen, A., & Ladino-Ospina, Y. (2019). Assessment: A suggested strategy for learning chemical equilibrium. Education Sciences, 9(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030174
Bernard, P., Dudek-Ró?ycki, K., & Orwat, K. (2019). Integration of inquiry-based instruction with formative assessment: The case of experienced chemistry teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.184
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-73.
Black, P., Harrison, C., & Lee, C. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Granada Learning.
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Education Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education
Boesdorfer, S. B., & Daugherty, J. (2020). Using Criteria-Based Digital Badging in High School Chemistry Unit to Improve Student Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09827-7.
Dini V., Sevian H., Caushi K., and Ordun˜a Pico´n R., (2020), Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Sci. Educ., 104(2), 290–325.
Easa, E., & Blonder, R. (2022). Development and validation of customized pedagogical kits for high-school chemistry teaching and learning: the redox reaction example. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2021-0022 Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761.
Hagos, T., & Andargie, D. (2022). Technology Integrated Formative Assessment: Effects on Conceptual Knowledge and Motivation in Chemical Equilibrium In Journal of Chemistry Education Research (Vol. 6, Issue 1).
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., … Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Izci, K., & Siegel, M. A. (2019). Investigation of an alternatively certified new high school chemistry teacher’s assessment literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.473605
Jammeh, A. L. J., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (2023). The interactive classroom: Integration of SMART notebook software in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13458
Kriswantoro, Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.285
Lyon, C. J., Oláh, L. N., & Wylie, E. C. (2019). Working toward integrated practice: Understanding the interaction among formative assessment strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 301–314.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514359
Murray, S. A., Huie, R., Lewis, R., Balicki, S., Clinchot, M., Banks, G., Talanquer, V., & Sevian, H. (2020). Teachers’ Noticing, Interpreting, and Acting on Students’ Chemical Ideas in Written Work. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3478–3489. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01198
Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Factors Affecting Secondary Schools Students’ Attitudes toward Learning Chemistry: A Review of Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379
Nadiia, I, Shyian., Alina, V, Kryvoruchko., Svitlana, V, Stryzhak. (2022). Methods of formative evaluation of students achievements in chemistry. Naukovij vìsnik Užgorods?kogo unìversitetu. Serìâ Pedagogìka, socìal?na robota, 324-327. doi: 10.24144/2524-0609.2022.50.324-327
Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A., Mukamanzi, O. U., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2022). Rubric-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools in Rwanda: A technology-based learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12251–12271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5
Nurhijrah, N., Abram, P. H., & Aminah, S. (2020). Effect of Cooperative Learning Model STAD Type Based on Mind Mapping toward Students’ Learning Outcomes on Chemical Bond Material in 10th Grade SMA Negeri 1 North Parigi. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 9(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2020.v9.i3.pp168-171
Ochsen, S., Bernholt, A., Grund, S., & Bernholt, S. (2023). Interestingness is in the eye of the beholder–the impact of formative assessment on students’ situational interest in chemistry classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 45(5), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2163204
Orduña Picón, R., Sevian, H., & Mortimer, E. F. (2020). Conceptual Profile of Substance: Representing Heterogeneity of Thinking in Chemistry Classrooms. Science and Education, 29(5), 1317–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00152-4
Park, M., Liu, X., & Waight, N. (2017). Development of the Connected Chemistry as Formative Assessment Pedagogy for High School Chemistry Teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00299
Ryan, S. A. C., & Stieff, M. (2019). Drawing for Assessing Learning Outcomes in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(9), 1813–1820.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00361
Schafer, A. G. L., & Yezierski, E. J. (2020). Chemistry critical friendships: Investigating chemistry-specific discourse within a domain-general discussion of best practices for inquiry assessments. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00245f
Schafer, A. G. L., & Yezierski, E. J. (2021). Investigating How Assessment Design Guides High School Chemistry Teachers’ Interpretation of Student Responses to a Planned, Formative Assessment. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01264
Talanquer, V. (2019). Some insights into assessing chemical systems thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2918-2925.
Understanding the interaction among formative assessment strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 301-314.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
Vogelzang, J., Admiraal, W. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Scrum methodology in context-based secondary chemistry classes: effects on students’ achievement and on students’ perceptions of affective and metacognitive dimensions of their learning. Instructional Science, 49(5), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09554-5
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2019). Students Perception Of Assesment and Feedback Practices: Making Learning Visible International Journal of Sustainability, Education, and Global Creative Economic (IJSEGCE), 2(1), 1-8.
Yik, B. J., Dood, A. J., Cruz-Ramírez De Arellano, D., Fields, K. B., & Raker, J. R. (2021). Development of a machine learning-based tool to evaluate correct Lewis acid-base model use in written responses to open-ended formative assessment items. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00111f
Yin, B., & Yuan, C. H. (2022). Detecting latent topics and trends in blended learning using LDA topic modeling. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12689–12712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11118-0
Zemel, Y., Shwartz, G., & Avargil, S. (2021). Preservice teachers’ enactment of formative assessment using rubrics in the inquiry-based chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 1074–1092. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00001b
(Ismail & Osman, 2024)
Ismail, N. H., & Osman, K. (2024). Exploring Formative Assessment Strategies in the Chemistry Classroom in Secondary School: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 464–485.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode