ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Based on previous research on the implementation methods of the CIPP curriculum evaluation model, which has been chaotic and disorganized, and the current implementation status, which presents many problems, this review aims to compare, integrate, and analyze the application of the CIPP curriculum evaluation model by different researchers. The focus is on exploring the differences, connections, advantages, disadvantages, and specific applications. The study finds: (1) The differences and connections in the use of the CIPP curriculum evaluation model by different researchers. (2) Summarizing and innovating a universal method for applying the CIPP model. This enriches the theory of curriculum evaluation and provides a reference for the application of the CIPP model in educational practice.
Agustina, N. Q., & Mukhtaruddin, F. (2019). The CIPP Model-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) Program at Language Center. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 22-31.
Al-Jardani, K. S. (2011). The need for developing a Framework for Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 128-134). IATED.
Ansyah, D., & Wahyuri, A. S. (2022). Evaluation of Achievement Development Program of Bengkulu Tennis School. Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(4), 789-797.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206.
Bao, W. (2012). Mechanism and Theoretical Explanation of the Enrollment Expansion of Higher Education in China. Education Research Monthly, 2012(8):3–11 Chinese.
Batdi, V. (2017). Comparing the High School English Curriculum in Turkey through Multi-Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 1255-1290.
Buker, M., & Niklason, G. (2019). Curriculum evaluation & improvement model. Journal of Health Administration Education, 36(1), 37-55.
Buri?, I., & Frenzel, A. C. (2021). Teacher emotional labour, instructional strategies, and students’ academic engagement: A multilevel analysis. Teachers and Teaching, 27(5), 335-352.
Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., & Suryani. (2022). COVID-19, emergency remote teaching evaluation: the case of Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2165-2179.
Carter, C., Barnett, H., Burns, K., Cohen, N., Gazulla, E. D., Nack, F., ... & Ussher, S. (2021). Defining STEAM approaches for higher education. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-16.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & State Council. (2020, October 13). Deepening the Overall Plan for Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era [Press release]. Retrieved from China Government
website:https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm
Coelho, C. S., & Moles, D. R. (2016). Student perceptions of a spiral curriculum. European Journal of Dental Education, 20(3), 161-166.
Coelho, C. S., & Moles, D. R. (2016). Student perceptions of a spiral curriculum. European Journal of Dental Education, 20(3), 161-166.
Darama, E., Karaduman, F., Kahraman, K., & Gündogdu, K. (2018). Evaluation of 5th Grade English Curriculum According to Stufflebeam's Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 7(2), 73-86.
Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179-196.
DiFlorio, I., Martin, B., Middlemiss, M. A., & Duncan, P. A. (1989). Curriculum
evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 9(6), 402-407.
Egan, K. (1978). What is curriculum?. Curriculum Inquiry, 8(1), 65-72.
Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical teacher, 34(5), e288-e299.
Gögebakan Yildiz, D., Bilgin, S., Arikiz, S., & Tarhan, R. (2023). Evaluation of Preparatory Class Mathematics Curriculum of Social Sciences High School. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 13(1), 176-199.
Gul, F., Mahboob, U., Wajid, G., & Sherin, A. (2022). Medical colleges’ challenges and coping strategies in implementing accreditation standards in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(7), 1788.
Ilhan, E. (2021). Evaluation of Competency Based Medical Education Curriculum. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 153-168.
Iryani, E. (2023). ACHIEVEMENT OF MINIMUM EDUCATION SERVICE STANDARDS FOR INDONESIA DURING THE COVID 19 TRANSITION PERIOD. Research and Development Journal of Education, 9(1), 465-473.
Jones, K. F., Paal, P., Symons, X., & Best, M. C. (2021). The content, teaching methods and effectiveness of spiritual care training for healthcare professionals: A mixed-methods systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 62(3), e261-e278.
Jumari, J., & Suwandi, S. (2020). Evaluation of child-friendly schools program in Islamic schools using the CIPP model. Dinamika Ilmu, 20(2), 323-341.
Kaloka, P. T., Purwanto, S., & Wibowo, Y. A. (2018, December). Analysis Implementation Learning Adapted Physical Education in State High School. In 2nd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS 2018) and 1st Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2018) (pp. 54-57). Atlantis Press.
Khasanah, K. (2017). EVALUATION OF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AT INTEGRATED ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (SDIT AL-HIKMAH JAKARTA). Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 119-131.
Kliebard, H. M. (1982). Curriculum theory as metaphor. Theory into practice, 11-17.
Kress, G. (2000). A curriculum for the future. Cambridge journal of education, 30(1), 133-145.
Li, D., Supromin, C., & Boonlab, S. (2023). The Evaluation of China's Double Reduction Policy: A Case Study in Dongming County Mingde Primary School. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(6), 437-450.
Li, Y. (2023). A Study on the Classroom Engagement of Visually Impaired Students Based on the CIPP Evaluation Model: A Case Study of College English Classes in an Inclusive Education Context. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(28).
Li, Y., & Hu, C. (2022). The evaluation index system of teaching quality in colleges and universities: Based on the cipp model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 3694744.
Makina, A., & Kadzere, L. (2022). Exploring low-tech opportunities for higher education mathematics lecturers in an emergency techno-response pedagogy. Pythagoras, 43(1), 1-10.
Mathews, J. (2018). Curriculum exposed. Routledge
Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China, et al. (2021, March 17). Notice of the Ministry of Education and Five Other Departments on the Issuance of the "Guidelines for Quality Evaluation of Compulsory Education" [Press release]. Retrieved from Ministry of Education website: http: // www. moe. gov. cn /srcsite/ A06/ s3321/ 202103/ t20210317_ 520238.html
Mitchell, D., & Sutherland, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge.
Mohmmed, A. O., Khidhir, B. A., Nazeer, A., & Vijayan, V. J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching during Coronavirus pandemic: the current trend and future directive at Middle East College Oman. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5, 1-11.
Muji, A. P., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., & Falma, F. O. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of the sekolah penggerak curriculum using the context, input, process and product evaluation model in high schools. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(3), 377-384.
Mulato, N., Hidayatulloh, F., Purnama, S., & Syaifullah, R. (2023). Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation of Physical Education Learning Implementation: A Case Study of Schools Assisted by the Quality Assurance Agency of West Kalimantan Region. In Proceedings of the 2nd Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2022, 29 October 2022, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
Musa, B. (2003). An education system worthy of Malaysia. iUniverse.
Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A.H., Riasati, M.J., & Maata, R.L. (2020). Educational Program and Curriculum Evaluation Models: A Mini Systematic Review of the Recent Trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 4048-4055.
Nurhayati, R., Aw, S., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Hajaroh, M., & Herwin, H. (2024). Validity and Reliability of Child-Friendly School Policy Evaluation Instruments in Primary Schools: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(1), 965-977.
Ord, J. (2016). Curriculum as process: principles of procedure and curriculum as development. In Youth Work Process, Product and Practice (pp. 48-57). Routledge.
Ornstein, A. C. (1987). The Field of Curriculum: What Approach? What Definition?. The High School Journal, 70(4), 208-216.
Ouda, J. B., Mulaudzi, P., Najoli, E. K., Wanyama, R., & Runhare, T. (2019). An evaluation of stakeholder capacity in the implementation of millenium village primary school meal project. Evaluation and program planning, 72, 179-187.
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?. International business review, 29(4), 101717.
Poth, C. N., Searle, M., Aquilina, A. M., Ge, J., & Elder, A. (2020). Assessing competency-based evaluation course impacts: A mixed methods case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101789.
PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020?compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell systematic reviews, 18(2), e1230.
Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of educational psychology. SAGE publications.
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 94-108.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1968). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making.
Sukumaran, S., Shahid, N. S. M., Abdullah, N., & Thiagarajah, S. (2021). E-learning of STEM in Malaysian higher education institutions: Status and challenges. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 259-271.
Sunaryo, A. (2021). Evaluation of teaching factory in collaboration with PT. Telkom for the adaptability development of vocational school students ICT expertise program using CIPP. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 26, 215.
Teshome, Z., Wolde, B., Abrham, T., & Tadesse, T. (2022). Evaluating the practices and challenges of youth volleyball development in Amhara regional state, Ethiopia by using the CIPP model. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 719). MDPI.
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational administration quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.
Thurab-Nkhosi, D., Maharaj, C., & Ramadhar, V. (2021). The impact of emergency remote teaching on a blended engineering course: perspectives and implications for the future. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 159.
Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of education and health promotion, 10(1).
Tuc, Y., & Karadag, N. (2023). Program Evaluation In Open And Distance Learning: The Case Of Open Education System Call Center Services Associate Degree Program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 112-131.
Tuju, R. S., Rumbekwan, G., Sinaga, D. C., Ellss, V., & Mandacan, Y. (2022). Curriculum evaluation model in development higher education curriculum. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 2025-2032.
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In Curriculum studies reader E2 (pp. 60-68). Routledge.
Vartuli, S. A., & Rohs, J. (2008). Selecting curriculum content that stimulates thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 393-396.
Wang, J. (2020). Optimization of Teaching Content and Reform of Teaching Methods on the Course of Coal-Geology Based on Big Data Analysis. In 2020 International Conference on Information Science and Education (ICISE-IE) (pp. 54-57). IEEE.
Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. R. (1983). A meta?analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 419-435.
Wongwatcharapaiboon, J., Thienthaworn, A., & Budiwan, A. P. (2024). Reflective Keys of Integrative Research Studies in A Graduate Design Management Program, Thailand. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 21(1).
Yang, P., & Wang, R. (2020). Central-local relations and higher education stratification in China. Higher Education, 79, 111-139
Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of curriculum studies, 45(2), 101-118.
(Zou et al., 2024)
Zou, Y., Razali, F., & Mustakim, S. S. B. (2024). Exploring Universal Implementation Strategies: Comparative Analysis of CIPP Models. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 1084–1102.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode