Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

What Factors Influence Online Distance Learners' Engagement? Malaysian Student's Perspective

Liana Mohamad, Zahir Osman, Norjaya Mohd Yasin, Ratna Khuzaimah Mohamad

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23219

Open access

This study evaluates both direct relationships between online learning attitudes, online peer collaboration, psychological motivation, and online engagement, as well as the indirect relationship between online learning attitudes, online peer collaboration, and online engagement, mediated by psychological motivation. This study uses a purposive sampling of three Malaysian ODL higher education students, and 307 were analyzed. The survey questionnaire uses a five-point Likert scale for 20 observed variables representing four constructs. The SmartPLS3 is used for data analysis and hypothesis testing. Online learning attitude and online peer collaboration influenced psychological motivation, with online peer collaboration having a stronger influence. Online learning attitude and online peer collaboration were found to have a direct positive relationship with online engagement. Psychological motivation mediated the relationship between online learning attitude and online engagement. The originality of this study is the holistic approach to investigating the relationships between factors influencing online distance learners' engagement within the context of ODL higher education institutions. New insights from this study enable strategies to promote collaborative learning environments, motivation, and ODL students' online engagement. The findings demonstrated that an online learning attitude and peer collaboration are essential antecedents to online engagement, while psychological motivation significantly strengthens the learners' online engagement. Higher education institutions engaged in Open Distance Learning (ODL) should cultivate a sense of community and collective academic effort to enhance positive attitudes towards online learning and boost psychological motivation.

Abdullah, Z., & Said, M. (2022). Engaging and empowering Malaysian students through open and distance learning in the post-COVID era. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.853796
Adesina, O. O., Adesina, O. A., Adelopo, I., & Afrifa, G. A. (2023). Managing group work: The impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education, 32(1), 90-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023
Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287
Briggs, A. (2015, February). Ten ways to overcome barriers to student engagement online. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from https://blogs.illinois.edu/view/7449/807203
Brooks, A. K., Resta, P. E., & Schmidt, K. J. (2004). Students' attitudes toward interaction in online learning: Exploring the relationship between attitudes, learning styles, and course satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5-22.
Brown, A. V., Basson, M., Axelsen, M., Redmond, P., & Lawrence, J. (2023). Empirical evidence to support a nudge intervention for increasing online engagement in higher education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020145
Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S14-S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Chu, T. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016). With good we become good: Understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969465
Dahalan, N., Hassan, H., & Atan, H. (2012). Student engagement in online learning: Learners' attitude toward e-mentoring. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.351
Demir Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792-1797. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/154397/
Dessart, L. (2017). Social media engagement: A model of antecedents and relational outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(5-6), 375-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1302975
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018). Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Eakins, A., & Eakins, S. (2021). Advancing retention and engagement strategies through effective online mediums. In Research Anthology on Developing Effective Online Learning Courses (pp. 128-141). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7021-9.CH004
Esra, M. E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students' motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286748.pdf
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students' motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5
Gibbs, G. (2014). Student engagement, the educational purpose of universities and the role of leadership. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/
Graham, C. R. (2011). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Hartnett, M. (2012). Relationships between online motivation, participation, and achievement: More complex than you might think. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 16(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1515/del-2016-0011
Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education: An exploration of online engagement strategies. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 145-158). Routledge.
Henry, L. A., Castek, J., O'Byrne, W. I., & Zawilinski, L. (2012). Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing, and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(3), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.676431
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 39-43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17
Imonje, R. (2021). Re-envisioning pedagogy in the lens of asynchronous and synchronous learning in higher education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya. Journal of Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v11i4.19097
Jennings, C. (2021). Best practices for motivating and supporting learning for adult and non-traditional learners. In Best Practices for Motivating and Supporting Learning for Adult and Non-Traditional Learners (pp. 128-141). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6762-3.CH008
Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2006). The evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.122
Kanellopoulou, C., & Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2020). Engage and conquer: An online empirical approach into whether intrinsic or extrinsic motivation leads to more enhanced students' engagement. Creative Education, 11(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.112011
Kim, G., Zhu, J., & Weng, Z. (2022). Collaborative autoethnography in examining online teaching during the pandemic: From a 'teacher agency' perspective. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2078959
Kim, J., & Doo, M. (2022). The effects of motivation, career decision-making self-efficacy, and self-regulation on learning engagement of junior college students. Journal of College Student Development, 63(4), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2022.0036
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Lup, O., & Mitrea, E. (2021). Online learning during the pandemic: Assessing disparities in student engagement in higher education. Revped. https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2021.1/31
Mandernach, B. J., Donnelli-Sallee, E., & Dailey-Hebert, A. (2011). Assessing course student engagement. In Promoting Student Engagement (Vol. 1, pp. 277-281). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Nehme, M. (2010). E-learning and student's motivation. Legal Education Review, 20(1/2), 223-239. Retrieved from https://www.legaledreview.org/
Osman, Z., Mohamad, R. K., & Mohamad, L. (2021). Enhancing students' online engagement: A study on online distance learning institutions' students. GATR Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 9(3), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2021.9.3(2)
Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A. C. (2020). Reassessing disparities in online learner student engagement in higher education. Educational Researcher, 49, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19898690
Peng, W. (2017). Research on model of student engagement in online learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2869-2882. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00723a
Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
Purarjomandlangrudi, A., Chen, D., & Nguyen, A. (2016). Investigating the drivers of student interaction and engagement in online courses: A study of state-of-the-art. Informatics in Education, 15(2), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.14
Redmond, P., Abawi, L., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sengupta, A., & Williams, S. (2020). Can an engagement platform persuade students to stay? Applying behavioral models for retention. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37, 1016-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1861801
Spitzer, M. W. H., Gutsfeld, R., Wirzberger, M., & Moeller, K. (2021). Evaluating students' engagement with an online learning environment during and after COVID-19 related school closures: A survival analysis approach. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 25, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100168
Statista - The Statistics Portal. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/
Symons, K. (2021). 'Can you hear me? Are you there?': Student engagement in an online environment. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 22, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi22.730
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Organizational Identity: A Reader (Vol. 56, No. 65, pp. 9780203505984-16).
Tani, M., Gheith, M., & Papaluca, O. (2021). Drivers of student engagement in higher education: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Higher Education, 82, 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00647-7
Tian, M., Lu, G., Yin, H., & Li, L. (2020). Student engagement for sustainability of Chinese international education: The case of international undergraduate students in China. Sustainability, 12(16), 6831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176831
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
Wæraas, A., & Solbakk, M. N. (2009). Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education, 57, 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9155-z
Wilcox, B., Pollock, S., & Bolton, D. (2020). Retention of conceptual learning after an interactive introductory mechanics course. Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010140. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010140
Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2010). The role of students' motivation in peer?moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
Zang, F., Tian, M., Fan, J., & Sun, Y. (2022). Influences of online learning environment on international students' intrinsic motivation and engagement in the Chinese learning. Journal of International Students, 12(S1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS1.4608

Mohamad, L., Osman, Z., Yasin, N. M., & Mohamad, R. K. (2024). What Factors Influence Online Distance Learners’ Engagement? Malaysian Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 2972–2988.