Enhancing Mathematics Assessment for Students with High Support Needs through Multisensory Integration: A Literature Review

Almughyiri, S. (2022). Special Education Teachers and Student Academic Achievement in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2022.37.25
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education
Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of mathematics performance from Preschool to Grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 699–713.
Bacquet, J. N. (2020). Implications of Summative and Formative Assessment in Japan – A Review of the Current Literature. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.2p.28
Baharom, N., Salleh, N., & Tahar, M. M. (2022). Elements of Mathematics Intervention Instrument Based on Learning Styles for Students with Learning Disabilities (IMGaP) using Fuzzy Delphi Analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(2), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol10.2.3.2022
Benavides-Varela, S., Callegher, C., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., Altoè, G., & Lucangeli, D. (2020). Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematicsematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953
Bhat, B. A., & Bhat, J. (2019). Formative and Summative Evaluation Techniques for Improvement of Learning Process. https://ejbss.org/
Bonti, E., Kamari, A., Kougioumtzis, G. A., Theofilidis, A., & Sofology, M. (2020). Different Theoretical Perspectives on Specific Learning Difficulties in Mathematics. Implications for Special Educational Intervention and for Everyday School Practice: An overview study. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(2), 107–118.
Bull, R., Espy, K.A., & Wiebe, S.A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematicsematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 205–228.
Can Da?k?n, N., & Hatipo?lu, Ç. (2019). Reference to a past learning event as a practice of informal formative assessment in L2 classroom interaction. Language Testing, 36(4), 527–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219857066
Chikwe, C. K., & Atteng, C. (n.d.). Evaluation Strategies in Assessing Learning Outcomes of Students with Disabilities in Rivers State. 11(2), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388- 1102041721
Clements, D. (1999). 'Concrete' manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 45-60
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. An International Journal of Educational Technolog andApplied Linguistics, 42(1), 462–473.
DeMarco, L., Panzarella, K., Ferro, H., Pownall, L., Case, A., Nowakowski, P., & Cieri, N. (2015). Outcomes of an interprofessional simulation curriculum. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 453-468.
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom.Theoryinto Practice, 55(2),153159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Dowker, A. (2015). Individual differences in arithmetical abilities: The componential nature of arithmetic. In R. Cohen Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.). Oxford handbook of numerical Cognition (pp. 878–894). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J. et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology , 43 , 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012- 1649.43.6.1428.
Durand, M., Hulme, C., Larkin, R., & Snowling, M. (2005). The cognitive foundations of reading and arithmetic skills in 7- to 10-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(2), 113–136
Erdamar, G., & Alpan, G. (2013). Examining the epistemological beliefs and problem solving skills of preservice teachers during teaching practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2), 129–143. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.694101
Faragher, R., and R. I. B. (2005). "Numeracy for Adults with down Syndrome: It's a Matter of Quality of Life." Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 49 (10): 761–765. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00747.x.
Fitzpatrick, J., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. (2004). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education
Furberg, A. (2016). Teacher support in computer-supported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students conceptual understanding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 89–113.
Gamal Khalifa, A., Ali, M., & Saad, E. (2021). The Effectiveness of Touch Mathematics on Improving Early Mathematics Ability of Kindergarten Children with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Functioning in an Inclusion Classroom. Print Journal of Intellectual Disability-Diagnosis and Treatment (Vol. 9).
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., and Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? Int. J. Sci. Mathematics. Educ. 15 (S1), 105–123. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Gifford, S., & Rockliffe, F. (2012). Mathematics difficulties: Does one approach fit all? Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14794802.2012.657436.
Guven, B., & Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematicsematical problem-solving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 131–137.
Hiebert, J. (1988). A theory of developing competence with written mathematicsematical symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics (19), 333-355
Huijsmans, M. D. E., Kleemans, T., Ven, S. H. G., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). Tags relevance of subtyping children with mathematicsematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704
Jeyasekaran, J. M. (2015). Effectiveness of visual auditory kinesthetic tactile technique on reading level among dyslexic children at Helikx open school and learning center, Salem. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 4(3), 315- 318.https://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2015.0511201467
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting First-Grade mathematics achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Olah, L. N., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at-risk for mathematics difficulities. Child Development, 77(1), 153–177.
?flazo?lu-Saban, A., & Güzel-Yüce, S. (2012). Problem solving, metacognition and epistemological beliefs in 6th, 7th and 8th grade students. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1402–1428.
Kakia, D., & Kougioumtzis, G. A. (2016). Dyscalculia and Advisory Educational Intervention. Journal of Regional Socio-Economic Issues, 6(2), 92-10
Kamii, C., & Rummelsburg, J. (2008). Arithmetic for first graders lacking number concepts. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(7), 389-394
KARAGÖL, ?., & ADIGÜZEL, O. C. (2022). Hammond De?erlendirme Modeli. ODÜ Sociology Bilimler Ara?t?rmalar? dergisi (ODÜSOB?AD). https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1160173
Klang, N., Karlsson, N., Kilborn, W., Eriksson, P., & Karlberg, M. (2021). Mathematicsematical Problem-Solving Through Cooperative Learning—The Importance of Peer Acceptance and Friendships. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.710296
Latipun. (2015). Experimental psychology. Malang: UMM Press.
Leshchii, N., Shevchuk, V., Galushchenko, V., Prytykovska, S., Kabelnikova, N., Pyliaieva, N. (2022). Innovative Ways of Working with Parents who Educate Children with Special Needs. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(3), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/353
Locuniak, M. N., & Jordan, N. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451–459.
Marita, S., & Hord, C. (2017). Review of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 29-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0731948716657495
Martínez, I., Pérez-Ferra, M., Jiménez, J. L. U., & Quijano-López, R. (2019). Promoting professional development for teachers through a scale of competence assessment. Print Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Vol. 4, Issue 2).
Ministry of Education., (2014). (Code of Practice for Pupil Education Special Needs), Special Education Division, MOE.
Ministry of Education., (2019a). Curriculum Standard Document and Assessment, Communication Functional Primary Secondary School Standard Curriculum
Mohammed, A. (2013). Multi - sensory attention to the development program of the effectiveness of the primary school pupils with learning difficulties reading. Journal of Special Education, 4, 114126.
Myers, J. A., Jun, W., Brownell, M. T., & Gagnon, J. C. (2015). Mathematics interventions for students with learning disabilities (LD) in secondary school: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities—A Contemporary Journal, 13(2), 207-235.
Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (2011). Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum. Cortex, 47(1), 117–127.
doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.016PMID:19818437
Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K. M., and Rakes, C. R. (2012). A longitudinal study of school connectedness and academic outcomes across sixth grade. J. Sch. Psychol. 50, 443- 460. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.03.002
Orton-Gillingham Academy (2023, May 9). "What is the Orton-Gillingham Approach?" https://www.ortonacademy.org/resources/what-is-the-orton-gillingham-approach/
Pape, S. J. (2004). Middle school children's problem-solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading comprehension perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 187–219.
Perrotta, C., & Whitelock, D. (2017). Assessment for learning. Print Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Themes (pp. 127–135). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02600-8_12
Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematicsematic problem solving skill of sixth grade students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 381–385.
Prasetyaningrum, S., & Faradila, A. (2019). Application of MULTISENSORY Methods (Visual, Auditory, Kinestetic, and Tactile) to Improve The Ability Reading for Mild Mental Retardation.
Radovi?, S., Radoji?i?, M., Veljkovi?, K., & Mari?, M. (2020). Examining the effects of Geogebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1512001
Rashidi, A., Faramarzi, S., & Shamsi, A. (2020). Meta-analysis of the effect of psychological nervous interventions on improving academic performance in students with specific learning disabilities. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 6(6), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.29252/shenakht.6.6.125
Roitsch, J., Gumpert, M., Springle, A., & Raymer, A. M. (2021). Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Quality Appraisal of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1708221
Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24 , 1301–1308. doi:10.1177/0956797612466268
Sadid-Zadeh, R., D'Angelo, E. H., & Gambacorta, J. (2018). Comparing feedback from faculty Interactions and Virtual Assessment Software in the Development of Psychomotor Skills in preclinical fixed prosthodontics. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 4, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.129
Schnepel, S., & Aunio, P. (2022). A systematic review of mathematics interventions for primary school students with intellectual disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1943268
Scott, K. S. (1993). Multisensory mathematics for children with mild disabilities. Exceptionality, 4(2), 97-111.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39—83). Chicago: Rand McNally
Sheldon, S. B., and Epstein, J. L. (2005). Involvement counts: family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. J. Educ. Res. 98, 196– 206. Team: 10.3200/joer.98.4.196-207
Simmons, M., & Sharp, L. (2019). Assessment in Special Education Teacher Preparation: An Examination of Practices. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.15760/nwjte.2019.14.2.1
Sofology, M., Kougioumtzis, G. A., Efstratopoulou, M., Skoura, E., Sagia, S., Karvela, S., Salli, P. M., Makri, E., & Bonti, E. (2021). Specific Learning Disabilities and Psychosocial Difficulties in Children (pp. 31–54). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7359-4.ch002
Sofology, M. (2014). Memory abilities in children. In M. Efstratopoulou (Ed.),Working with challenging children. From theory to practice in Primary Education(pp. 41–87). Nova Science Publishers
Spada, M. M., Nikcevic, A. V., Moneta, G. B., & Wells, A. (2008). Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1172–1181.
Stankov, L. (2000). Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2), 121–143.
Stevens, E. A., Austin, C., Moore, C., Scammacca, N., Boucher, A. N., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Current State of the Evidence: Examining the Effects of Orton-Gillingham Reading Interventions for Students With or at Risk for Word-Level Reading Disabilities. Print Exceptional Children (Vol. 87, Issue 4, pp. 397–417). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921993406
Svensäter, G., & Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787
Taleba, Z., & Hassanzadehb, F. (2015). Toward smart school: A comparison between smart school and traditional school for mathematics learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 90–95.
Tedesco, J. C. (2016). Ten notes on learning assessment systems.
Walle, J. (2007). Teaching developmentally: Elementary and middle school mathematics (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Veas, A., Castejón, J. L., Gilar, R., and Miñano, P. (2015). Academic achievement in early adolescence: the influence of cognitive and non-cognitive variables. J. Gen. Psychol. 142, 273–294. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2015.1092940
Veenman, M. V., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relationship between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–109.
Wisniewski, Z. G., & Smith, D. (2002). How effective is Touch Mathematics for improving students with special needs academic achievement on mathematics addition mad minute timed tests? Retrieved January 27, 2009, from ERICdigest.org
World Bank. (2019). Classroom assessment: Taking the first steps towards improved teaching and learning in Tajikistan
Zhang, Y., Wu, X., Zhu, C., & Zhou, J. (2023). Classroom Quantitative Evaluation: A Method of both Formative and Summative Evaluation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031783
Ziadat, A. H. (2021). The impact of using MULTISENSORY strategy on oral reading and reading comprehension skills of elementary students with dyslexia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.7

Ameran, B., & Zainal, M. S. (2024). Enhancing Mathematics Assessment for Students with High Support Needs through Multisensory Integration: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 1373–1383.

Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode