Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Integrated STEAM and Problem-Based Learning: A Teaching Framework to Enhance Undergraduates’ Creative Thinking

Shan Zhao, Abdul Halim Abdullah

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24490

Open access

With the growing importance of creative thinking in the modern world, there is a need for innovative teaching methods that can effectively cultivate this skill in undergraduates. This study introduces an integrated framework combining STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) education with Problem-Based Learning (PBL) to enhance undergraduates’ creative thinking through linear algebra courses. This framework was implemented during an 8-week course at a private university in Chongqing. This course incorporated real-world challenges, engaging students in interdisciplinary tasks, including mathematical modeling, computational analysis, and artistic representations. Instructors guided students through creative exploration and reflective practice to foster the core aspects of creative thinking: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Qualitative observations and students feedback revealed that the STEAM-PBL framework significantly improved engagement and promoted the application of interdisciplinary knowledge. The findings present a replicable framework for creative teaching in higher education, highlighting its potential to foster creative thinking (CT) through the integration of interdisciplinary approaches and problem-based learning.

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Allina, B. (2013). The evolution of a game-changing acronym: Why government recognition of STEAM is critical. Arcade, 31(2), 1-3.
Anindya, F. (2020). Pengaruh model PjBL-STEAM terhadap keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi instrumen cahaya dan optic. J. Fis. Seri Konf,
Arends, R. (2014). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Avsec, S., & Šinigoj, V. (2016). Proactive technical creativity: mediating and moderating effects of motivation. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(4), 540-545.
Barrows, H. S. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Medical Education, 1.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM project-based learning (pp. 1-5). Brill.
Coelho, A., & Cabrita, I. (2015). A creative approach to isometries integrating geogebra and italc with ‘paper and pencil’environments. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10, 71-85.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson.
Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The prospect of an" A" in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10.
Diego-Mantecon, J.-M., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., Blanco, T. F., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project-based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137-1148.
Santos, E. E. F., Silva Figueira-Sampaio, A., & Carrijo, G. A. (2015). Mapping free educational software used to develop geometric reasoning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 136-142.
Fong, C. J., Kremer, K. P., Cox, C. H.-T., & Lawson, C. A. (2021). Expectancy-value profiles in math and science: A person-centered approach to cross-domain motivation with academic and STEM-related outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101962.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: Macgraw Hill.
Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2004). Cognitive transfer from arts education to nonarts outcomes: Research evidence and policy implications. In Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 135-161). Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 16, 235-266.
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 529-552.
Krutet?s?ki?, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. (No Title).
Kuo, H.-C. (2024). Transforming Tomorrow: A Practical Synthesis of STEAM and PBL for Empowering Students’ Creative Thinking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10511-0
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 285-294.
Lu, S.-Y., Lo, C.-C., & Syu, J.-Y. (2021). Project-based learning oriented STEAM: the case of micro–bit paper-cutting lamp. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(5), 2553-2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09714-1
Lu, S.-Y., Wu, C.-L., & Huang, Y.-M. (2022). Evaluation of Disabled STEAM -Students’ Education Learning Outcomes and Creativity under the UN Sustainable Development Goal: Project-Based Learning Oriented STEAM Curriculum with Micro:bit. Sustainability, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020679
Onarheim, B., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Applying the neuroscience of creativity to creativity training. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00656
Perkins, D. N. (2013). Knowledge as design. Routledge.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12.
Novalinda, M. G., Ambiyar, S., Fajra, M. (2020). PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING- 21ST CENTURY VOCATIONAL EDUCATION.
Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 203-212.
Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. (2019). Student perspectives on proof in linear algebra. ZDM, 51(7), 1069-1082.
Suganda, E., Latifah, S., Sari, P. M., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). STEAM and Environment on students’ creative-thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Torrance, E. (1988). Creativity as manifest in testing. The nature of creativity.
U?ra?, M. (2018). The Effects of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creativity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.05.012
Virtue, E. E., & Hinnant-Crawford, B. N. (2019). “We’re doing things that are meaningful”: Student Perspectives of Project-based Learning Across the Disciplines. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1809
Volle, E. (2018). Associative and controlled cognition in divergent thinking: Theoretical, experimental, neuroimaging evidence, and new directions. The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity, 333-360.
Wandari, G. A., Fany, A., Wijaya, C., & Agustin, R. R. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM pada Penguasaan Konsep dan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Cahaya dan Optik. J. Sci. Learn, 2, 1-7.
Woods, D. R., Duncan-Hewitt, W. C., Hall, F. L., Eyles, C. H., & Hrymak, A. N. (1996). Tutored versus tutorless groups in problem-based learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 60(3), 231-238.
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education. An overview of creation a model of integrative education/PATT.

Zhao, S., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025). Integrated STEAM and Problem-Based Learning: A Teaching Framework to Enhance Undergraduates’ Creative Thinking. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 866–877.