Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Effective Reading Strategies for Success in the TOEFL Reading Section: A Comprehensive Review

Wang Jing, Aida Binti A. Rahman

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24622

Open access

This literature review will look at existing research on ways for improving TOEFL reading scores. The reading portion of the TOEFL test assesses non-native English speakers' ability to consume and comprehend academic literature, which is essential for success in an English-language academic setting. This study discusses key strategies for improving reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and overall exam success, with a focus on the challenges faced by Chinese test takers. This work synthesizes and reviews previous research to give useful insights for educators and students, as well as instructional ideas for TOEFL preparation courses. The research findings aim to bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical applications, resulting in a more targeted and effective method for learning the TOEFL reading exam.

Afrianto, A. (2017). Challenges of using portfolio assessment as an alternative assessment method for teaching English in Indonesian schools. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 1(2), 106-114.
Hammad, E. (2021). Palestinian EFL university students’ problems with the reading sections of the TOEFL Internet-based Test and the Revised TOEFL Paper-delivered Test. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12.
Abusaeedi, A. A. R., & Khabir, M. (2017). EFL learners’ metacognitive reading strategies preferences in relation with their perfectionism regarding gender. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 108-118.
Alahmadi, N. S. (2019). The role of input in second language acquisition: An overview of four theories. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 3(2), 70-78.
Alami, M. (2016). Cross-gender comparison of metacognitive strategies utilized by Omani students in reading comprehension classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(4), 20-28.
Andriani, E., & Mbato, C. L. (2021). Journal on English as a Foreign Language. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 275-296.
Ardiana, F. K., Putra, K. A., & Drajati, N. A. (2024). Teacher Beliefs on Collaborative Strategic Reading in TOEFL Preparation Course: A Case Study. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1800-1814.
Badu, H. (2020). Students’ ability in reading TOEFL. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 1(2), 89-100.
Baker, L., & Beall, L. C. (2014). Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 397-412). Routledge.
Bao, R., & Du, X. (2015). Implementation of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(3), 291-310.
Bergey, B. W., Deacon, S. H., & Parrila, R. K. (2017). Metacognitive reading and study strategies and academic achievement of university students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of learning disabilities, 50(1), 81-94.
Bhandari, L. P. (2020). Task-based language teaching: A current EFL approach. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 1-5.
Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226-244.
Cao, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). A Study on Metacognitive Strategy Use in Listening Comprehension by Vocational College Students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 127-139.
Channa, M. A., Nordin, Z. S., Siming, I. A., Chandio, A. A., & Koondher, M. A. (2015). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies: a review of previous studies. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 181-186.
Chen, Q., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2023). Facilitating the Comprehension of Academic Content in the TOEFL iBT Test Preparation Classroom. In Handbook of Multilingual TESOL in Practice (pp. 345-357). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Chen, S., Hu, Z., Kang, S., & Wang, A. (2024). Krashen’s Input Hypothesis Revisited: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Arts, Culture and Language, 1(7).
Chen, Y. (2022). A Review of Research on Krashen’s SLA Theory Based on WOS Database (1974-2021). Creative Education, 13(7), 2147-2156.
Chua, H. W., & Lin, C. Y. (2020). The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching in Learning Motivation. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 2(1), 41-48.
Dharmawan, K. A., & Desfitranita, D. (2018). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties and Strategies in Answering TOEFL Reading Comprehension Section (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup).
Dhillon, B. P. S., Herman, H., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). The Effect of Skimming Method to Improve Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text. Linguists: Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(1), 77-88.
Dong, Y., Tang, Y., Chow, B. W. Y., Wang, W., & Dong, W. Y. (2020). Contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension among Chinese students: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 525369.
Douglas, S. R., & Kim, M. (2014). Task-based language teaching and English for academic purposes: An investigation into instructor perceptions and practice in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal, 1-1.
Duan, Q., (2019). Some reflections on TOEFL reading teaching in international high schools. New Oriental English: Chinese and English versions (2), 1.
East, M. (2017). Research into practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language teaching, 50(3), 412-424.
Ellis, R. (2014). Taking the critics to task: The case for task-based teaching. Proceedings of CLASIC, 108.
Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507-526.
Fajri, D. R. (2019). An analysis of student strategy in completing toefl reading comprehension test. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL), 2(2), 84-91.
Fatmawan, A. R., Dewi, N. P. A., & Hita, I. P. A. D. (2023). Skimming and Scanning Technique: Is It Effective for Improving Indonesian Students’ Reading Comprehension?. Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 10(3), 1181-1198.
Fitria, T. N. (2022). An analysis of the students’ difficulty in reading the TOEFL prediction test. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni, 23(2), 110-123.
Fitria, T. N. (2024). Question Types on Reading Comprehension in TOEFL Test: An Implication in Teaching Reading TOEFL to Students. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 41-54.
Flavel J. H., (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L .B. Resnick (Ed.). The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friska, Y. (2022). Problems in Reading Comprehension of TOEFL Prediction Test. Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 96-104.
Girsang, A. L., Marbun, F. V. G., Turnip, Y. A. M., & Saragih, E. (2019). An analysis of reading comprehension difficulties in TOEFL test by high school students. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 3(1), 132-137.
Gorelova, Y. N., Zalyaeva, E. O., & Sungatullina, D. D. (2015). Semantic context clues in expository texts for toefl ibt reading section preparation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 551-559.
Hayikaleng, N., Nair, S. M., & Krishnasamy, H. N. (2016). Thai students’ L2 reading comprehension level for lower order thinking skills and higher order thinking skills questions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 83-91.
Herdi, H. (2016). The Students’ Reading Ability on Test of English as the Foreign Language (TOEFL. ELT-Lectura, 3(1).
Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Effect of Extensive Rote Learning Experience on Subsequent Academic Achievement: Rote Learning Experience. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 65(4), 510-514.
Ismail, N. M., & Fata, I. A. (2021). Improving reading TOEFL score through note taking strategy. Al-Ta lim Journal, 28(1), 46-54.
Jaelani, S. R., Wathoni, H., Purnama, B., Harianto, H., & Wadi, S. (2022). The students’ ability in reading comprehension of TOEFL test for The EFL learners. JSHP: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 6(1), 60-66.
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta?analysis. Language learning, 64(1), 160-212.
Jia, S. (2020). The Discussion of the College English Teaching Based on the Analysis of Toefl. Frontiers in Educational Research, 3(4).
Jiang, X. (2020). Chinese student perceptions on English test preparation courses in China. Culminating Projects in TESL, 27.
Jordan, J., Wagner, J., Manthey, D. E., Wolff, M., Santen, S., & Cico, S. J. (2020). Optimizing Lectures From a Cognitive Load Perspective. AEM Education and Training, 4(3), 306-312.
Kamal, M. (2018). Issues Faced by Students in Comprehending TOEFL Reading Text (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
Kamil, C. A. T. (2020). The Students’ Strategies in Answering Reading Section of TOEFL Test (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry).
Kaniadewi, N., & Asyifa, D. I. (2022). The Effect of TOEFL Preparation Course on EFL Undergraduate Students’ TOEFL Scores. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 6(1), 12-20.
Karimullah, I. W., & Mukminatien, N. (2022). Problems faced and strategies applied by test-takers in completing the TOEFL iBT Test. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 574-590.
Keshmirshekan, M. H. (2019). Krashen's Input Hypothesis, Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation: i+1 versus i-1. Language in India, 19(5), 10-26.
Khataee, E., & Davoudi, M. (2018). The role of cultural schemata in inferential reading comprehension: An investigation in the Iranian EFL context. Asian Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AJTLHE), 10(2), 11-27.
Koceva, V. (2018). Krashen's Theory of Second Language Acquisition. Knowledge-International Journal, Scientific Papers, 22(6), 1511-1518.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Kurniawati, A., & Fitrawati, F. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Comprehending TOEFL Reading Test at English Department Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(3), 593-598.
Lee, J. Y. (2015). Language Learner Strategy by Chinese-Speaking EFL Readers When Comprehending Familiar and Unfamiliar Texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 71-95.
Lewis, P. J. (2016). Brain friendly teaching—reducing learner's cognitive load. Academic radiology, 23(7), 877-880.
Li, X. W. (2022). Strategies in TOEFL Reading Comprehension for Chinese Students. Master's Projects and Capstones. 1476.
Liao, S. T., (2018). A preliminary study of TOEFL reading teaching in international high schools. English Square: Academic research, (5), 143-144.
Liu, Y., Mishan, F., & Chambers, A. (2021). Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in higher education in China. The Language Learning Journal, 49(2), 131-146.
Lubis, N., & Siregar, N. P. H. (2022). Exploring Of Students’ Difficulties In Reading Section Of Toefl. Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies, 209-220.
Maizarah, M. (2019). Analysis on The Students’ Common Difficulties in TOEFL Reading Comprehension (A Case Study on The Second Semester of English Study Program at Islamic University of Indragiri Tembilahan). EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 3(2), 99-106.
Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (2019). Hypothesis: A class supplying rich comprehensible input is more effective and efficient than “Immersion.”. IBU Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(3), 83-89.
Maspufah, M. (2022). EFL Learners’ Ability in Reading Scientific Text in TOEFL. Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1), 1-8.
Mawarni, A., & Usman, M. (2022). Students’ Opinion towards the Use of Skimming and Scanning Techniques for TOEFL in Reading Comprehension. English LAnguage Study and TEaching, 3(2), 1-8.
Motlagh, F. A., Jafari, A. S., & Yazdani, Z. (2014). A general overview of task-based language teaching (TBLT), from theory to practice. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5-1), 1-11.
Muliawati, I., Ismail, N. M., Lismalinda, B. R., & Rizka, B. (2020). Test-taking anxiety among EFL university students in TOEFL test: A case study from Indonesian context. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 200-208.
Nikolaieva, O. (2016). A qualitative study on preparing EFL students to take the TOEFL internet-based (iBT) test in the Ukrainian context (Master's thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway).
Noroozi, M., & Taheri, S. (2022). Task-based language assessment: a compatible approach to assess the efficacy of task-based language teaching vs. present, practice, produce. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2105775.
Nurhayati, N., & Nehe, B. (2016). An Analysis of Students’ Strategies in Answering TOEFL. Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1).
Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: Theory and practices. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(2), 134-148.
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2020). Cognitive-load theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394-398.
Pramesti, R. A. (2023). Investigating Students’ Strategies and Difficulties in Facing TOEFL Reading Section. Journal of English Language and Education, 8(2), 52-62.
Pratista, G. Y. (2023). Presentation Practice Production Vs Task-Based Language Teaching: A Comparison Of Two Teaching Templates. EDUPEDIA, 7(1), 1-13.
Putlack, M., Poirier, S., & Jacobs, A. (2020). Decoding the TOEFL ® iBT: Actual test, reading 2. Korea: Darakwon.
Rachman, D. (2017). Vocabulary test Strategies used by the Students to answer Vocabulary Test the Reading Comprehension of TOEFL.
Rahman, I. F., Kamsinah, K., & Nur, N. A. (2021). The Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Accomplishing TOEFL Minimum Score as the Final Requirement. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 7(2), 359-373.
Rahman, K. (2020). Perceived use of metacognitive strategies by EFL undergraduates in academic reading. Voices of English Language Education Society, 4(1), 44-52.
Rahmatillah, K. (2019). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) through role play and task-based instruction. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 4(1), 161-177.
Raju, N., & Joshith, V. P. (2018). Krashen’s Theory of Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Approach for English Language Classrooms. International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts, 6(12), 179-184.
Rondon, T. K., & Tomitch, L. M. B. (2020). The Effect of Different Pre-Reading Activities on Pre-Intermediate and Advanced EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension. Revista (Con) Textos Linguísticos, 14(29), 719-738.
Samad, I. A., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL students’ strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL reading comprehension section. International Journal of Language Education, 1(1), 29-36.
Septiana, T. I. (2021). Analysis of Students' Problems on the Reading Section of TOEFL. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(1), 139-154.
Setiawan, A. H. (2019). The Use of Skimming and Scanning Techniques in Reading Comprehension for Toefl (An Experimental Research at UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh) (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
Seyedi, S. H., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2014). The application of task-based writing and traditional writing on the development of reading comprehension of EFL advanced Iranian learners. International Journal of English language education, 2(1), 225-240.
Sania, S. (2023). The Correlation of EFL Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of TOEFL Reading Comprehension Strategies and Their TOEFL Reading Comprehension Scores (Doctoral dissertation, UIN AR-RANIRY).
Sholeh, M. B. (2020). Implementation of task-based learning in teaching English in Indonesia: Benefits and problems. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 1-9.
Sungatullina, D. D., Zalyaeva, E. O., & Gorelova, Y. N. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of TOEFL reading comprehension strategies. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 26, p. 01046). EDP Sciences.
Suryani, N. Y. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual classroom in TOEFL preparation. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(2), 198-209.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Tauchid, A., & Suwandi, E. (2021). The Implementation of Non-Sequential Strategy to Face TOEFL ITP Problems. JELL.
Thalmann, M., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2019). How does chunking help working memory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 37.
Thuy, N. T. T. (2020). Metacognitive awareness of using reading strategies by TESOL postgraduates intakes 11 and 12 at Ho Chi Minh City open university. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 157-167.
Tong, X., Kwan, J. L. Y., Xiuli Tong, S., & Deacon, S. H. (2022). How Chinese–English bilingual fourth graders draw on syntactic awareness in reading comprehension: Within?and cross?language effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 409-429.
Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164-181.
Wang, T. (2022). Task-based Learning Strategies for Developing Students’ Textual Understanding and Critical Thinking Abilities in An English Intensive Reading Class (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wales Trinity Saint David (United Kingdom)).
Wathoni, H., Purnama, B., Harianto, H., Wadi, A. S., Jaelani, S. R., & Ningsih, B. S. (2022). Analysis on EFL Learners' Capability in Mastering TOEFL Test on Reading Comprehension. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 114-119.
Wicaksono, A., & Jatmiko, J. (2024). The High Achievers’ Strategies in Answering Reading Comprehension in TOEFL. Cendikia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(9), 100-105.
Zalha, F. B., Alfiatunnur, A., & Kamil, C. A. T. (2020). Strategies in dealing with the reading section of ‘TOEFL prediction’: A case of Aceh EFL learners. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(2), 159-171.
Zarnis, Y., Septiana, T. I., & Trisanti, O. L. (2021). Analysis of students’ problems on the reading section of TOEFL. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(1), 139-154.
Zhang, D., & Yang, X. (2016). Chinese L2 learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge and its role in reading comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 699-715.
Zhang, X. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of CET, IELTS and TOFEL for English Acquisition. In 2022 5th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2022) (pp. 2193-2202). Atlantis Press.
Zhu, Z. (2021). The Relationship between Reading Anxiety and Reading Performance: A Comparison Study of Chinese Postgraduates in China and in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Research, 2(4), 197-211.
Zuhrayana, D. (2018). TOEFL as A Requirement of Graduation: What Challenges (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).

Jing, W., & Rahman, A. B. A. (2025). Effective Reading Strategies for Success in the TOEFL Reading Section: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 909–927.