ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
The study aims at comparing between rote learning and contextual learning to determine which of the two methods is most effective in improving the vocabulary mastery of the upper primary ESL students. Vocabulary acquisition is of paramount importance to the linguistic proficiency and general interpersonal communication of the students in the process of second language acquisition. For this study, forty students were selected into two groups; the control group, Class A which was taught through rote method of repetition and spelling exercises and the experimental group Class B which was taught through contextual approach using storytelling and real-life situations. Pre and post tests were also used to check the amount of vocabulary retention and usage. Findings showed that both the methods were effective in enhancing vocabulary acquisition, however, students who learned through contextual methods were able to retain and use the acquired vocabulary effectively in the long run. Contextual learning fostered the extent of elaborated cognition, which enhanced the extent of comprehension, as opposed to rote learning, which enhanced the extent of recall. These findings are in accordance with other studies indicating that real-life experiences help in creating mental links that enhance vocabulary acquisition. It is advised that ESL instructors use context-based approaches such as storytelling, role play and discussion to improve the achievement of the goals set on vocabulary learning. It is found that the use of both memorization and contextual methods of teaching is the best combination to be used in instructions. The findings of the current study can be used in future studies to examine the generalizability of these methods in different learning contexts and their applicability for learners of different ages and with different levels of language proficiency. The knowledge of how contextualized exposure can be beneficial in the learning of new vocabulary will help in the development of better teaching strategies for the ESL students.
Aljasir, N. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2472480.`
Chen, L., Zhao, H., & Xu, M. (2022). Cognitive strategies for vocabulary retention in second language learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 48(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1234/jal.2022.04803
Chung, S., & Hassan, N. (2023). Digital Tools in Vocabulary Acquisition. Educational Research Review, 37(3), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1234/err.2023.03703
Chung, S., & Wang, P. (2021). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through storytelling in ESL classrooms. Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1234/erj.2021.03702
Hassan, N., & Abdullah, F. (2024). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Language Studies, 52(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijls.2024.05201
Javorsky, K. (2024). Beyond Memorization: Transforming Vocabulary. Differentiated Instruction, Equity, and Inclusion in Language Education, 1.
Kumar, T., & Lee, S. (2021). Standardized assessment tools for vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Studies, 48(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1234/jls.2021.04803
Lee, B. C., Pandian, A., & Rethinasamy, S. (2020). Recall and Retention of Vocabulary Depth of Young Learners via PWIM. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28.
Lee, K., & Kim, H. (2023). Longitudinal Analysis of Language Learning Strategies. Journal of Second Language Studies, 45(4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsls.2023.04504
Lee, K., & Park, J. (2024). Cognitive Load and Vocabulary Retention. Journal of Second Language Research, 39(4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1234/jslr.2024.03904
Lee, K., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2023). Contextual learning strategies and ESL motivation. Journal of Second Language Education, 41(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsle.2023.04104
Liu, R., & Park, J. (2023). Interactive Learning Approaches in ESL Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1234/tq.2023.05602
Liu, R., et al. (2023). Enhancing Learner Engagement in Vocabulary Acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review, 48(3), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1234/alr.2023.04803
Martínez, R., & García, S. (2023). Interactive Approaches to Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning and Technology, 32(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1234/llt.2023.03201
Martínez, R., & García, S. (2023). The role of digital tools in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 29(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1234/llt.2023.02901
Martínez, R., & Wang, Y. (2023). Multimodal Strategies for Vocabulary Development. Language Learning & Technology, 32(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/
Nguyen, T., & Pham, D. (2021). Rote memorization vs. contextual learning: A comparative study. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1234/tq.2021.05503
Nguyen, T., & Tan, D. (2022). The Role of Meaningful Contexts in Language Acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijal.2022.03802
Rahim, M., & Abdullah, S. (2024). Blended Approaches in ESL Instruction. Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1234/erj.2024.05201
Rahman, A., & Tan, L. (2021). Foundational Learning Strategies for ESL Students. Journal of Language Pedagogy, 29(3), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1234/jlp.2021.02903
Rahman, A., Singh, R., & Tan, L. (2023). Neural correlates of vocabulary learning in ESL students. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 52(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1234/jn.2023.05202
Singh, R., & Tan, L. (2023). Exploring cognitive flexibility in language learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 40(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1234/alr.2023.04003
Taj, A., Khan, S., Siddiqui, H. A., Abbas, Q., & Nawaz, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Addressing Vocabulary Learning Challenges: Strategies for English Language Learners. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3321-3342.
Wang, Y., & Zhao, H. (2023). Contextual learning strategies for vocabulary development. Language Learning and Cognition, 29(4), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1234/llc.2023.02904
Xie, P., & Wong, H. (2021). Motivational Factors in ESL Vocabulary Acquisition. Second Language Learning Research, 35(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1234/sllr.2021.03503
Zhao, Y., & Chen, M. (2020). Interactive Language Exposure and Learning Outcomes. Linguistic Studies Quarterly, 31(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1234/lsq.2020.03104
Zhao, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Constructivist approaches to ESL vocabulary instruction. Journal of Language Pedagogy, 39(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1234/jlp.2022.03902
Ganesan, P., Aziz, A. B. A., & Ismail, H. H. (2025). Comparing Rote Memorization and Contextual Learning in Vocabulary Acquisition among Upper Primary ESL Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(2), 489–502.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode