Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

A Theoretical Review of Classroom Discourse

Omar Ali Al-Smadi, Radzuwan Ab Rashid

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3169

Open access

This paper reviews the characteristics of classroom discourse and interactional routines in an adult classroom. Classroom discourse differs in functions and forms from language used in other contexts as teachers and students have specific goals and engage in different sets of activities in the classroom. Student learning is influenced by their ability to negotiate meaning and work together in completing the given tasks. The successful negotiation of meaning suggests that learning has taken place. On the other hand, teacher talk also influences the student learning. Teachers in classroom modify and simplify their talk to suit their objectives and effectively engage students with different levels of proficiency. This paper concludes that an effective classroom discourse involves successful negotiation of meanings not only between teacher and student(s) but also between student(s) and students(s).

Abbuhl, R. (2011). Why, when, and how to replicate research. In A. Mackey & S. Gass, (Eds.). Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 296-312). London: Wiley Blackwell.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Behnam, B., & Pouriran, Y. (2009). Classroom discourse: Analyzing teacher/learner interaction in Iranian EFL task-based classrooms. Porta Linguarum, 12, 117-132.
Behtash, Z., & Azarnia, T. (2015) A case study of teacher talk time and student talk time in an Iranian language school, International Journal of English Language,(2), 274 -285.
Bitchener, T. (2004). The relationship between negotiation and meaning. Language Awareness, 13 (2), 81-95.
Blake, R. (2000). Computer Mediated Communication. A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Clark, C., & Clark, I. (2008). Exploring and exposing a gap in L2 research: How socio-linguistic roles and relationships facilitate or frustrate second language acquisition. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30(1), 101-113.
Daniels, H. (2001) Vygotsky and Pedagogy. NY: Routledge/Falmer.
Derakhshan, A., Tahery, F., & Mirarab, N. (2015). Helping adult and young learner to communicate in speaking classes with confidence. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 520-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p520.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages,141-150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., &Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literature gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1094-1103.
Henzl, V. (1979). Foreigner talk in the classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 159-167.
Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage. 222-245.
Kelch, K. (1985). Modified input as an aid to comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 81-90.
Khadidja, K. (2010). The Effect of Classroom Interaction on Developing the Learner’s Speaking Skill. A Thesis, Mentouri University.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.
Kurhila, S. (2004) Clients or language learners - being a second language speaker in
institutional interaction. In: R. Gardner and J. Wagner, eds. Second language
conversations. London: J, W and Contributors.
Lee, Y. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 180-206.
Leeman, J. (2003) Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63.
Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177-193.
Long, M. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In W.Ritchie& T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Acquisition. New York, Academic. 413- 468.
Lynch, T. (1996). Communication in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macky, A. (2007). Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Monteiro, K. (2014). An experimental study of corrective feedback during video-conferencing. Language Learning and Technology, 18 (3), 56–79.
Naegle, P. (2002). The New Teacher?s Complete Sourcebook. USA: Scholastic Professional Book.
Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of 'triadic dialogue'?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376-406.
Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A
comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Oradee, Th. (2012). Developing speaking skills using three communicative activities (discussion, problem-solving, and role- play). International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 532- 533.
Pasfield-Neofitou, S. (2014). Language learning and socialization opportunities in game worlds: Trends in first and second language research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 271-284.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning, conditions, processes, outcomes? Language Learning, (44), 493-527.
Rashid, R. A. (2016). Topic continuation strategies employed by teachers in managing supportive conversations on Facebook Timeline. Discourse Studies, 18(2), 188-203.
Rivers, W. (1987). Interactive Language Teaching. Interaction as the Key toTeaching Language for Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scarino, A., & Liddicoat A. J. (2009). Teaching and Learning Languages: A Guide. Melbourne: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching.UK: Macmillan Education.
Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation analytic research into language teaching and learning. In E.Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 345?363. New York: Routledge.
Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Shim, J. H. (2007) Teacher Talk as Strategies in the Classroom.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R., (1975) Toward an analysis of discourse. Oxford University
press.
Smith, B. (2003a). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 38-57.
Sommat, S. (2007) The effects of the patterns of negotiation of meaning on the English language used in communicative information gap tasks by Thai lower secondary school students. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in English Language Studies, Suranaree University of Technology.
Suhaili, W. S. H., & Haywood, J. (2017). A student-centered approach to ideas generation for projects: Is it a threat to creativity and innovation?. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(1), 13-26.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning in Cook, G. and Seidelhofer, B. (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson.125-144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szendroi, I. (2010) Teacher talk in the ESP classroom: The results of a pilot observation
study conducted in the tourism context, (4), 39 -58.
Van der Zwaard, R. (2017). Patterns of (negotiated) interaction during telecollaboration between native and advanced non-native speakers Utrecht: LOT.
Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985b) Non native/Non Native Conversations: A model for Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 71-90.
Walsh, S. (2006b). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.
Wellington J. J., Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Open University Press.
Xuewen, H. (2006). Teacher talk in EFL in university classrooms. Dissertation submitted as a partial fulfillment for the degree of M.A. in English Language and Literature. Chongqing Normal University and Yangtze Normal University, China.
Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: it’s about time!. Language Learning & Technology, 14 (3), 72-93.

In-Text Citation: (Al-Smadi & Rashid, 2017)
To Cite this Article: Al-Smadi, O. A., & Rashid, R. A. (2017). A Theoretical Review of Classroom Discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(3), 129–138.