Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Organisational Discourse Markers in ESL Students’ Essays: A Study of Metadiscourse

Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed, Radzuwan Ab Rashid

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3197

Open access

Metadiscourse is the linguistic expressions and signalling words used by a writer to organise a text and connect with the readers. This research paper is a preliminary study to explore and identify the metadiscourse markers from organisational discourse markers category in 195 persuasive essays written by second year undergraduate students at a chosen public university in Malaysia. The organisational discourse markers category (ODM) is one of the two main categories, other than the interpersonal discourse markers category (IDM), in a simplified metadiscourse framework for ESL lay writers proposed by (Tan, 2012). This preliminary study focuses on ODM because this category assists a writer to manage the flow of ideas in a text. It is also relevant to get an idea of how metadiscourse markers are applied by this group of tertiary level students to organise their essays, through the use of organisational discourse markers. The metadiscourse markers in the essays were searched with the assistance of a concordance software, WordSmith 5.0. The findings of this study provide a platform for a larger study of metadiscourse use in Malaysian undergraduate students’ essays.

Amiryousefi, M., & Rasekh, M. (2010). Metadiscourse: Definitions, issues and its implications for english teachers. Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4),159-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p159
Anas, M., Ismail, N. S., Ab Rashid, R., Ab Halim, Z., & Zubir, B. N. (2016). The narrative structure and rhetorical elements in The Companions of Cave. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(5), 70-75.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Journal of Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
Hempel, S., & Degand, L. (2008). Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese and fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 676-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.001
Heng, C. H., & Tan, H. (2010). Extracting and comparing the intricacies of metadiscourse of two written persuasive corpora. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(3), 124-146.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing, continuum guides to discourse. London, England: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Intraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M.S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8
Jalilifar, A., & Alipour, M. (2007). How explicit instruction makes a difference: Metadiscourse markers and EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 38(1), 35-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2007.10850203
Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Journal of Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364707
Noor, M. N. (1998). Word combination for business English: A study based on a commerce and finance corpus for ESP/ESL applications. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Rashid, R. A., Rahman, M. F. A., & Rahman, S. B. A. (2016). Teachers’ engagement in social support process on a networking site. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 1(1), 34-45.
Rashid, R. A. (2016). Topic continuation strategies employed by teachers in managing supportive conversations on Facebook Timeline. Discourse Studies, 18(2), 188-203.
Rustipa, K. (2014). Metadiscourse in Indonesian EFL Learners’ Persuasive Texts: A Case Study at English Department, UNISBANK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), 44-52. doi:10.5539/ijel.v4n1p44
Kopple, V. W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. Journal of College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. 10.2307/357609
Williams, J. M. (1985). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

In-Text Citation: (Mohamed & Rashid, 2017)
To Cite this Article: Mohamed, A. F., & Rashid, R. A. (2017). Organisational Discourse Markers in ESL Students’ Essays: A Study of Metadiscourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(3), 194–206.