Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Validity and Reliability of the Teacher Leadership Inventory in Malaysian Educational Context

Mahaliza Mansor, Jamal@Nordin Yunus, Fanny Kho Chee Yuet

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i3/4566

Open access

The aims of this article is to report the validity and reliability of the Teacher Leadership Self Assessment (TLSA). The sample of the study consists of 244 trained teachers who are chosen using random sampling technique from 19 secondary schools in Perak. The content validity, criterion validity and construct validity analyses have been carried out by using this set of data. The findings of this study using panel of expert views, Pearson correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis through orthogonal rotation with varimax method has formed six factors, consisted of twenty eight-items of TLSA with factor loadings range from .52 -.74. The reliability Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the overall item is .91, meanwhile for each factor developed ranged from .66 to .83. As the conclusion, these analyses have generate a new pool of TLSA item to measure the construct of teacher leadership in Malaysian Educational context. However, the findings are valuable for the ministry of education, researchers, teachers, and teacher educators' references, which are interested more in exploring teacher leadership self assessment.

Ahmad, N., A, Mahamod, Z., & Aziz, Z. (2012). Pengajaran komunikasi bagi murid-murid bermasalah pembelajaran teruk. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2 (2): 11-18
Babbie, E. (2007). Practice of social research. United States: Cengage Learning.
Bandalos, D. L. & Finney, S. J. (2010) Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory . Dalam G. R. Hancock dan R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer`s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pg. 94-114). New York: Routledge.
Breakwell, P. G., Hammond, D. S. M., Fife-Schaw, D. C., & Smith, P. J. A. (2006). Research methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2009) Exploratory and confirmatory studiesof the structure of the bem sex role inventory short form with two divergentsamples. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 9 (4), 696-705.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2012). Spheres of teacher leadership action for learning. Professional Development in Education. 38(2), 267-286.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistic using SPSS. Singapore: SAGE Publication.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham R., L. (2010).Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hallam, P., Chou, P., Hite, J., & Hite, S. (2012). Two contrasting models for mentoring as they affect retention of beginning teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 96(3), 243-278.
Hancock, G. R., Mueller, R. O., & Stapleton, L. M. (Eds.). (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Routledge.
Harris, A. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration. 49.6, 624-636.
Henson, R., K., Capraro, R., M.,& Capraro, M., M. (2004). Reporting practice and use of
exploratory factor analysis in educational research journals. Research in the school, 11,
61-72.
Hawkins-Revis, J. (2007). Advancing teacher leadership capacity: Teacher’s Leaders’ Perceptions of Social and Organizational Structures on teacher-leader and Teacher Interactions. (Doctoral Dissertation).
Hayton, J., C., Allen, D., G., &Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, (7),191 DOI: 10.1177/1094428104263675.
Henson, R. K. & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in publishedresearch common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416.
Johnson, R., B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Katzenmeyer, M, & Moller, G. (2001). Awakeing the Slepping Giant: Leadership Development for Teachers (2ndEdition). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.
Katzenmeyer, M, & Moller, G. (2009). Awakeing the Slepping Giant: Leadership Development for Teachers (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.
Killion, J., & Harrison C. (2006). Taking the lead: New lead roles for teachers and school-based coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
Leithwood, K., Mulford, W., & Silins, H. (2004). Educational Leadership for Organisational Learning and Improved Students Outcomes. New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Mohd Noah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaanmodul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik.Serdang: Penerbit UPM.
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robinson, J. (2009). Teachers leadership and school reform: A case study of the Accelerating student achievement Project in a central Kentucky school district. (Doctoral dissertation).
Sireci, S. G., Yang, Y., Harter, J., & Ehrlich, E. J. (2006). Evaluating guidelines for

In-Text Citation: (Mansor, Yunus, & Yuet, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Mansor, M., Yunus, J., & Yuet, F. K. C. (2018). Validity and Reliability of the Teacher Leadership Inventory in Malaysian Educational Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 480–488.