ISSN: 2226-6348
Open access
Teaching is a systematic plan to achieve a learning objective. As a profession it is taken as a mission to mold the young. There are three basic methods of teaching used by the instructors namely: teacher-centered, student-centered and focus-centered method. This research aimed to determine the different methods used by the faculty members and the learning preference of the engineering students that would help in attaining good coordination leading to students’ academic learning. Descriptive type of research was utilized in the study with 100 engineering students as the respondents. Based on the data gathered, professors often used teacher-centered method while content-focused method is considered the most preferred by the students. From these results, an enhancement program was designed for the students to be able to cope with the teaching styles for their effective learning.
Agno, L. (2009). Principles of Teaching, Pateros Metro Manila, Grandwater Publications.
Akiri, A. A., & Ugborugbo, N. M. (2007). Teachers’ Effectiveness and Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Delta State, Nigeria.
Alday, R. B., & Panaligan, A. B. (2013). Reducing Math Anxiety of CCS Students Through e-Learning in Analytic Geometry, Educational Research International, 2(1): 76-90.
Ashman, M. and Ongwae, M. (2001). Trainer's Handbook - A 14 days Teaching Methodology Course, Trainer’s Handbook, Kenya.
Bay, B. E. J. (2013). Integration of Technology-Driven Teaching Strategies for Enhancing Photojournalism Course, Educational Research International, 2(2): 155-164
Bourner, T. (2000). Teaching Methods for Learning Outcomes. Centre for Management Development, University of Brighton, UK
Definition of Teaching and its Characteristics. (2008). Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://ugcnetonline.svtuition.org/2009/03/definition-of-teaching-and-its.html
Laguador, J. M. (2013a). Computer Utilization on Academic Performance, Health, and Behavior of Selected Students Enrolled in Board and Non-Board Degree Programs, International Journal of Information and Education Technology,3(3): 382-387.
Laguador, J. M. (2013b). Developing Students’ Attitude Leading Towards a Life-Changing Career, Educational Research International, 1(3): 28 – 33.
Laguador, J. M. (2013c). Engineering Students’ Level of Study Habits and Factors Affecting Them, International Journal in IT and Engineering, 1(3):1-13
Laguador, J. M. (2013d). Academic Problems and Negative Attitude of Engineering Students Towards Engineering Program, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 3(7): 495-505
Laguador, J. M. (2013e). Observed Classroom Behavior as Predictor of the Major Examination Results in Advanced Statistics of BS Industrial Engineering Students, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 3(7), 349-360
Laguador, J. M. (2013f). Academic Performance of Freshman Engineering Students Based on their Perception and Actual Final Grades, Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 1(7): 1-8
Laguador, J. M., & Agena, E. M. (2013). Time Management and Teaching Performance among Maritime and Engineering Faculty Members: Basis for an Intervention Plan, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(3): 42-61.
Laguador, J. M., & Camello, N. C. (2013). Developing Sense of Volunteerism Among University Students, Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 1(6):236 - 238
Laguador, J. M., & Chavez, N. H. (2013). Assessment of Engineering Students’ Acquired Affective Learning from Involvement in Community Extension Services, Academic Research International, 4 (3): 188-197.
Laguador, J. M., & Dizon, N. C. (2013). Academic Achievement in the Learning Domains and Performance in Licensure Examination for Engineering Among LPU’s Mechanical and Electronics Engineering Graduates, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 3(8): 347-378
Luntangan, R. (2012). The Interdisciplinary Research Journal of AIIAS Graduate School (Vol 15, Number 2).1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020: McGraw-Hill.
Salandanan, G. C. (2007). Methods of Teaching. Aurora Blvd., cor. Boston Street, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.
Teacher- Centered Approach vs. Learner-Centered Approach in Modern Education. (2005). Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://www.go2essay.com/blog/teacher-centered-approach-vs-student-centered- approach-in-modern-education/
What Is Content-Focused Coaching. (2013). Retrieved July 21, 2013, fromhttp://precisionmi.com/Materials/CoachingMat/ContentFocusedCoaching.pdf
Which is Best: Teacher-Centered or Student-Centered Education? Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/classroom-resources/which-is-best-teacher-centered-or-student-centered-education/
In-Text Citation: (Abanador et al., 2014)
To Cite this Article: Abanador, J. R., Buesa, G. C. D., Remo, G. M. L., & Mañibo, J. (2014). Teaching Methods and Learning Preferences in the Engineering Department of an Asian University. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 1–14.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode