Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Importance of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Design and Technology Subject

Fazidah Naziri, Mohammad Sattar Rasul, Haryanti Mohd Affandi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5366

Open access

Clinical supervision that contains the elements of Knowledge Technology and Content Pedagogy is not emphasized by the administration especially for technical and vocational teachers who teach new Designs and Technology subjects in schools throughout Malaysia. The purpose of this study is to identify needs PTPK element in clinical supervision among Design and Technology teachers (RBT) during the teaching process in the classroom. The sample of the study consisted of Senior Technical and Vocational Subject Teachers (GKMP TV) of 4 84 people in the state of Melaka. The study was carried out using quantitative methods through random sampling with the use of a questionnaire. Overall, the data shows that the element of knowledge of the content of the subject, giving the lowest mean of the pedagogical technology knowledge element. While the elements of technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, content pedagogy knowledge, content technology knowledge and content pedagogy technology are indispensable in the guidance process in the supervision of RBT teachers. The teacher's challenge enhances the latest technology competence, knowledge and teaching skills to become a necessity to meet the wave of a transformation of RBT subjects and achieve a high level of professionalism. Schools become a platform where teachers learn and teach students to enjoy.

Atkins, M.B. & Brown, G. (2002). Effective teaching in higher education. Routledge.
Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Is Not Happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13 (4), 519-546.
Cox, S. & Graham, C. (2009). An elaborated model of the TPACK framework. In I. Gibson et al. Proceeding Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009.pp 4042-4049. Chespeake, VA: AACE
Desa, M.N., Sarkawi, S., Ibrahim, M. & Salleh, M.N. (2013). Technology Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Teachers Trainees in University of Sultan Idris Education. National Proceeding Seminar ICT in Education. 81-86
Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, E.W. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Graham, C.R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., ST. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK Development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of in-service science teachers. Tech-Trens, 53 (5), 70-79.
Graham, C.R., J. Borup & N.B. Smith. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6). 1-17
Gulbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers and Education, 49 (4). 943-956
Habib, M.S. & Baharudin, S. (2012). Profil Tumpuan Guru Sekolah Menengah Di Negeri Selangor Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perubahan Kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan, 27(1), 165-178
Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action: A Descriptive Study of Secondary Teachers' Curriculum-Based, Technology-Related Instructional Planning.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promises. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17 (6), 550-565.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Preliminary Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Koehler, MJ, Mishra, P. & Kurnia Yahya. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & education 40: 740-762.
Krejcie, R.V. & Mogan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lilia Halim & T. Subhan Mohd Meerah. (2002). Science Trainee Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research In Science & Technological Education. 20 (2): 215-260
Mastuti, I & Aziah, S. (2011). The New Meaning of Education Change Kuala Lumpur: National Translation Institute of Malaysia.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108 (6), 1017-1054.
Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. & Henriksen, D. (2010). The Seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st Century Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.51(2), 22-28.
Mustafa, A.H.M., Ismail, M.A. & Noh, M.N. (2016). Demographic Factors Behind the Pedagogical Levels of Teacher Content (TPCK): One Overview: National Proceeding Seminar ICT in Education.151-166
Palmer, P.J. (2017). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. John Wiley & Sons.
Roslena Bonyamin. Penyeliaan Klinikal Guru Besar Terhadap Keberkesanan Pengajaran Guru. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Thesis
Scwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: World Economic Forum. New York: Crown Business
Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. & Shin, T.S. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of An Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42(2,) 123-149.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Te

In-Text Citation: (Naziri, Rasul, & Affandi, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Naziri, F., Rasul, M. S., & Affandi, H. M. (2019). Importance of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Design and Technology Subject. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 99–108.